Belgium - First Division BData current as of 23 July 2026

RWDM vs KAA Gent II: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
1 : 0half-time 1:0
KAA Gent II crest
KAA Gent II
125%(2.25)
X20%(3.30)
255%(2.80)

KAA Gent II is showing significantly better form than RWDM, averaging 2.4 points per match in their last five games compared to just 1.2 points for the hosts. The away team has an impressive 60% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+5), while RWDM concedes an average of 2.09 goals per game at home and has a negative goal difference (-4). KAA Gent II's recent form (four wins in the last five matches) contrasts with the inconsistent results of the hosts, who have lost three of their last five. Furthermore, the visitors have better xG statistics (1.51 vs 1.39) and a higher average ball possession (56% vs 52%), indicating their qualitative superiority. RWDM's high home defeat rate (55%) and the guests' better defensive record (1.2 goals conceded per away game) further support a win for KAA Gent II.

RWDM vs KAA Gent II: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM play KAA Gent II in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 31 January 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. KAA Gent II: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. KAA Gent II scores 1.31 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 63%, KAA Gent II 53%. Over 2.5: RWDM 59%, KAA Gent II 56%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

KAA Gent II has higher xG: 1.50 vs 1.33. RWDM: 11.5 shots per match, KAA Gent II: 12.5.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84. KAA Gent II: half-time lead 28%, second-half goals 0.72.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). KAA Gent II: 61-75 (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

KAA Gent II is showing significantly better form than RWDM, averaging 2.4 points per match in their last five games compared to just 1.2 points for the hosts. The away team has an impressive 60% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+5), while RWDM concedes an average of 2.09 goals per game at home and has a negative goal difference (-4). KAA Gent II's recent form (four wins in the last five matches) contrasts with the inconsistent results of the hosts, who have lost three of their last five. Furthermore, the visitors have better xG statistics (1.51 vs 1.39) and a higher average ball possession (56% vs 52%), indicating their qualitative superiority. RWDM's high home defeat rate (55%) and the guests' better defensive record (1.2 goals conceded per away game) further support a win for KAA Gent II.

Half-by-half

1 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

32Possession (%)68
RWDMKAA Gent II
11Shots20
RWDMKAA Gent II
4Shots on target4
RWDMKAA Gent II
1.2xG2.15
RWDMKAA Gent II
3Corners5
RWDMKAA Gent II
31Dangerous attacks85
RWDMKAA Gent II
12Fouls7
RWDMKAA Gent II
0Cards1
RWDMKAA Gent II

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1.31
RWDMKAA Gent II
1.69Goals conceded / match1.59
RWDMKAA Gent II
48%Average possession58%
RWDMKAA Gent II
4.38Shots on target / match4.38
RWDMKAA Gent II

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match12.47
RWDMKAA Gent II
4.38Shots on target4.38
RWDMKAA Gent II
13.6%Shot conversion10.5%
RWDMKAA Gent II
48%Possession58%
RWDMKAA Gent II
1.33xG for1.5
RWDMKAA Gent II
1.54xG against1.63
RWDMKAA Gent II

Shooting quality

RWDM: Efficient finishingKAA Gent II: Balanced
RWDMKAA Gent II
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RWDM
LDLWL
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-7
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
KAA Gent II
LWLLD
Season result split
38% W16% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-5-15
1.28 pts / match · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-1-8
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLLLD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.49Opponent xG: 1.88BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 19% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - RWDM · 1.31 goals / match - KAA Gent II

KAA Gent II is 6% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.69 goals / match - RWDM · 1.59 goals / match - KAA Gent II

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 19% (6 of 32 matches).

KAA Gent II scoring profile: strong

KAA Gent II scores in 66% of matches (21 of 32 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

50Goals scored (season)42
RWDMKAA Gent II
54Goals conceded (season)51
RWDMKAA Gent II
3.25Average goals in match2.91
RWDMKAA Gent II
8Goals scored (last 5)5
RWDMKAA Gent II
11Goals conceded (last 5)11
RWDMKAA Gent II

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal66%
RWDMKAA Gent II
50%2 goals44%
RWDMKAA Gent II
19%3 goals16%
RWDMKAA Gent II
3%4 goals6%
RWDMKAA Gent II

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal81%
RWDMKAA Gent II
53%2 goals47%
RWDMKAA Gent II
31%3 goals22%
RWDMKAA Gent II
6%4 goals9%
RWDMKAA Gent II

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time19%
RWDMKAA Gent II
13%BTTS in both halves0%
RWDMKAA Gent II
34%Scored in both halves28%
RWDMKAA Gent II

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS47%
RWDMKAA Gent II
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
RWDMKAA Gent II
100%BTTS - last 560%
RWDMKAA Gent II

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time66%
RWDMKAA Gent II
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
RWDMKAA Gent II
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time16%
RWDMKAA Gent II

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time81%
RWDMKAA Gent II
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
RWDMKAA Gent II
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time22%
RWDMKAA Gent II

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.41 pts / match - RWDM · 1.28 pts / match - KAA Gent II

RWDM - half-time state
34% leading38% draw28% trailing
KAA Gent II - half-time state
28% leading44% draw28% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.28
RWDMKAA Gent II
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.59
RWDMKAA Gent II
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.66
RWDMKAA Gent II
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.25
RWDMKAA Gent II
63%Clean sheet before half-time56%
RWDMKAA Gent II
41%No goal before half-time59%
RWDMKAA Gent II

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.34
RWDMKAA Gent II
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.72
RWDMKAA Gent II
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.94
RWDMKAA Gent II
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.66
RWDMKAA Gent II
38%Clean sheet after half-time44%
RWDMKAA Gent II
44%No goal after half-time47%
RWDMKAA Gent II

RWDM - second-half results

28% W31% R41% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

KAA Gent II - second-half results

34% W31% R34% P
41
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
43
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.28
PPG before half-time
Lead holding136%

Leads at half-time in 28% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.3

Concedes 0.3 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
KAA Gent II - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.601.00
Goals scored / match0.01.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.4
Average goals in match0.82.4
1 goal40%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-4-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

KAA Gent II
ScoredConceded
6
8
0-15
6
6
16-30
7
7
31-45
4
7
46-60
12
11
61-75
7
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.08
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
108%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-35%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

KAA Gent II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.13
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
96%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
109%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 14% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaKAA Gent II
Average goals in match 3.252.84 2.91
Both teams scored 63%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%54% 56%
Clean sheets 22%26% 19%
Goal before half-time 72%71% 66%
Goal after half-time 88%79% 81%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 1 - 0 - 0 KAA Gent II. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

KAA Gent B
0 : 2
Racing White Daring Molenbeek 47

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs KAA Gent II?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 1:0 KAA Gent II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs KAA Gent II?

RWDM score 1.56 goals per game on average and KAA Gent II 1.31. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of RWDM's matches and 53% of KAA Gent II's.

What form are RWDM and KAA Gent II in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and KAA Gent II 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs KAA Gent II?

The statistical background for RWDM vs KAA Gent II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.