RWDM vs KAA Gent II: match statistics
KAA Gent II is showing significantly better form than RWDM, averaging 2.4 points per match in their last five games compared to just 1.2 points for the hosts. The away team has an impressive 60% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+5), while RWDM concedes an average of 2.09 goals per game at home and has a negative goal difference (-4). KAA Gent II's recent form (four wins in the last five matches) contrasts with the inconsistent results of the hosts, who have lost three of their last five. Furthermore, the visitors have better xG statistics (1.51 vs 1.39) and a higher average ball possession (56% vs 52%), indicating their qualitative superiority. RWDM's high home defeat rate (55%) and the guests' better defensive record (1.2 goals conceded per away game) further support a win for KAA Gent II.
RWDM vs KAA Gent II: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RWDM played against KAA Gent II in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 31, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
RWDM has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. KAA Gent II has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.
Scoring records
RWDM scores 1.67 goals per game and allows 1.81. KAA Gent II scores 1.38 and allows 1.33. Games in this league average 2.73 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of RWDM's games and 48% of KAA Gent II's. The Over 2.5 rates are 62% and 52%, compared with league averages of 52% for BTTS and 51% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
KAA Gent II has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.41 per game. RWDM takes 12.3 shots per game, while KAA Gent II takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
RWDM leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. KAA Gent II leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.62 after halftime.
When the teams score
RWDM's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For KAA Gent II, it is minutes 61-75 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.73 goals. Both teams score in 52% of games, and 51% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
KAA Gent II is showing significantly better form than RWDM, averaging 2.4 points per match in their last five games compared to just 1.2 points for the hosts. The away team has an impressive 60% win rate on the road and a positive goal difference (+5), while RWDM concedes an average of 2.09 goals per game at home and has a negative goal difference (-4). KAA Gent II's recent form (four wins in the last five matches) contrasts with the inconsistent results of the hosts, who have lost three of their last five. Furthermore, the visitors have better xG statistics (1.51 vs 1.39) and a higher average ball possession (56% vs 52%), indicating their qualitative superiority. RWDM's high home defeat rate (55%) and the guests' better defensive record (1.2 goals conceded per away game) further support a win for KAA Gent II.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RWDM | KAA Gent II | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
KAA Gent II is 100% better for: last-5 form.
1.2 pts / game - RWDM · 2.4 pts / game - KAA Gent II
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 21% better for: goals scored per game.
1.67 goals / game - RWDM · 1.38 goals / game - KAA Gent II
KAA Gent II is 36% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.81 goals / game - RWDM · 1.33 goals / game - KAA Gent II
RWDM scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 meczów), while KAA Gent II keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 meczów).
KAA Gent II scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 meczów), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RWDM
Over / Under - KAA Gent II
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
KAA Gent II is 10% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / game - RWDM · 1.57 pts / game - KAA Gent II
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
KAA Gent II - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RWDM
KAA Gent II
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RWDM | Liga | KAA Gent II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.48 | 2.73 | • 2.71 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 57% | 52% | ▼ 48% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 62% | 51% | • 52% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 28% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | • 71% | 71% | ▼ 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 78% | ▼ 76% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from RWDM's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against KAA Gent II. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of RWDM vs KAA Gent II?
The First Division B match finished RWDM 1:0 KAA Gent II. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs KAA Gent II?
RWDM score 1.67 goals per game on average and KAA Gent II 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.73 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 51% of games. Both teams score in 57% of RWDM's matches and 48% of KAA Gent II's.
What form are RWDM and KAA Gent II in?
Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and KAA Gent II 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs KAA Gent II?
The statistical background for RWDM vs KAA Gent II — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.