Belgium - First Division BData current as of 17 July 2026

RWDM vs Patro Eisden: match statistics

RWDM crest
RWDM
2 : 4half-time 1:2
Patro Eisden crest
Patro Eisden
130%(3.00)
X25%(3.15)
245%(2.18)

Patro Eisden displays decidedly better form and defensive efficiency in away matches. The visitors have a positive goal difference on the road (+2) and concede an average of only 0.89 goals per match, while RWDM concedes an average of 1.9 goals in home games and holds a negative balance (-2). RWDM wins just 20% of matches at home and loses as many as 50%, pointing to serious problems in the host role. Patro Eisden has better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 points per match vs 1.0) and a significantly higher expected goals ratio in away matches (xG 1.76 vs xGA 1.03). Given RWDM's weakness at home and the visitors' defensive and offensive solidity, Patro Eisden has real chances of securing three points in this meeting.

RWDM vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

RWDM play Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The match date is 24 January 2026 at 20:00. Final score: 2:4.

Current form

RWDM: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Patro Eisden: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

RWDM scores 1.56 and concedes 1.69 goals per match. Patro Eisden scores 1.38 and concedes 1.29. League average: 2.84 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: RWDM 63%, Patro Eisden 53%. Over 2.5: RWDM 59%, Patro Eisden 47%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

xG, shots and style

Patro Eisden has higher xG: 1.65 vs 1.33. RWDM: 11.5 shots per match, Patro Eisden: 14.8.

Match halves

RWDM: half-time lead 34%, second-half goals 0.84. Patro Eisden: half-time lead 35%, second-half goals 0.82.

Goals by minute

RWDM: 76-90+ (13 goals). Patro Eisden: 76-90+ (12 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

First Division B: 2.84 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 54%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 1.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

Patro Eisden displays decidedly better form and defensive efficiency in away matches. The visitors have a positive goal difference on the road (+2) and concede an average of only 0.89 goals per match, while RWDM concedes an average of 1.9 goals in home games and holds a negative balance (-2). RWDM wins just 20% of matches at home and loses as many as 50%, pointing to serious problems in the host role. Patro Eisden has better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 points per match vs 1.0) and a significantly higher expected goals ratio in away matches (xG 1.76 vs xGA 1.03). Given RWDM's weakness at home and the visitors' defensive and offensive solidity, Patro Eisden has real chances of securing three points in this meeting.

Half-by-half

1 : 2
1st half
1 : 2
2nd half

Match statistics

61Possession (%)39
RWDMPatro Eisden
10Shots18
RWDMPatro Eisden
4Shots on target11
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.08xG2.34
RWDMPatro Eisden
4Corners2
RWDMPatro Eisden
22Dangerous attacks61
RWDMPatro Eisden
15Fouls16
RWDMPatro Eisden
1Cards0
RWDMPatro Eisden

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.56Goals scored / match1.38
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.69Goals conceded / match1.29
RWDMPatro Eisden
48%Average possession37%
RWDMPatro Eisden
4.38Shots on target / match5.24
RWDMPatro Eisden

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.5Shots per match14.82
RWDMPatro Eisden
4.38Shots on target5.24
RWDMPatro Eisden
13.6%Shot conversion9.3%
RWDMPatro Eisden
48%Possession37%
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.33xG for1.65
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.54xG against1.16
RWDMPatro Eisden

Shooting quality

RWDM: Efficient finishingPatro Eisden: Attacking
RWDMPatro Eisden
Accuracy (shots on target)38%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

RWDM
LDLWL
Season result split
28% W28% R44% P
Season (W-D-L)
9-9-14
1.13 pts / match · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-5-7
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
WLDDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.12Opponent xG: 1.71BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
Patro Eisden
LLWDL
Season result split
41% W29% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
14-10-10
1.53 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-5-6
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LDWLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.41Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

RWDM is 13% better for: goals scored per match.

1.56 goals / match - RWDM · 1.38 goals / match - Patro Eisden

Patro Eisden is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.69 goals / match - RWDM · 1.29 goals / match - Patro Eisden

RWDM scoring profile: very strong

RWDM scores in 81% of matches (26 of 32 matches), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 29% (10 of 34 matches).

Patro Eisden scoring profile: very strong

Patro Eisden scores in 71% of matches (24 of 34 matches), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 22% (7 of 32 matches).

50Goals scored (season)47
RWDMPatro Eisden
54Goals conceded (season)44
RWDMPatro Eisden
3.25Average goals in match2.68
RWDMPatro Eisden
8Goals scored (last 5)7
RWDMPatro Eisden
11Goals conceded (last 5)10
RWDMPatro Eisden

How often they score at least...

81%1 goal71%
RWDMPatro Eisden
50%2 goals41%
RWDMPatro Eisden
19%3 goals15%
RWDMPatro Eisden
3%4 goals12%
RWDMPatro Eisden

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal71%
RWDMPatro Eisden
53%2 goals38%
RWDMPatro Eisden
31%3 goals12%
RWDMPatro Eisden
6%4 goals9%
RWDMPatro Eisden

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

25%BTTS at half-time15%
RWDMPatro Eisden
13%BTTS in both halves6%
RWDMPatro Eisden
34%Scored in both halves21%
RWDMPatro Eisden

BTTS and goal count

53%Min. 3 goals and BTTS41%
RWDMPatro Eisden
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS6%
RWDMPatro Eisden
100%BTTS - last 540%
RWDMPatro Eisden

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

72%Min. 1 goal before half-time68%
RWDMPatro Eisden
41%Min. 2 goals before half-time18%
RWDMPatro Eisden
16%Min. 3 goals before half-time9%
RWDMPatro Eisden

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
RWDMPatro Eisden
56%Min. 2 goals after half-time47%
RWDMPatro Eisden
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
RWDMPatro Eisden

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

RWDM - half-time state
34% leading38% draw28% trailing
Patro Eisden - half-time state
35% leading38% draw26% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.41Points per match (1st half)1.44
RWDMPatro Eisden
0.72Goals scored (1st half)0.56
RWDMPatro Eisden
0.66Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.38Average goals (1st half)1
RWDMPatro Eisden
63%Clean sheet before half-time59%
RWDMPatro Eisden
41%No goal before half-time59%
RWDMPatro Eisden

After half-time (2nd half)

1.16Points per match (2nd half)1.24
RWDMPatro Eisden
0.84Goals scored (2nd half)0.82
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.03Goals conceded (2nd half)0.85
RWDMPatro Eisden
1.88Average goals (2nd half)1.68
RWDMPatro Eisden
38%Clean sheet after half-time41%
RWDMPatro Eisden
44%No goal after half-time50%
RWDMPatro Eisden

RWDM - second-half results

28% W31% R41% P
45
Half-time points
23
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
37
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.41
PPG before half-time
Lead holding82%

Leads at half-time in 34% of matches and wins 28%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Patro Eisden - second-half results

29% W35% R35% P
49
Half-time points
19
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.44
PPG before half-time
Lead holding117%

Leads at half-time in 35% of matches and wins 41%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.4

Concedes 0.4 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

RWDM - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match0.80.8
Goals conceded / match1.01.2
Average goals in match1.82.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals40%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
Patro Eisden - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.200.80
Goals scored / match0.41.0
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.22.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

RWDM
ScoredConceded
9
6
0-15
9
7
16-30
5
8
31-45
8
9
46-60
6
7
61-75
13
17
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (17). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Patro Eisden
ScoredConceded
7
6
0-15
5
4
16-30
7
5
31-45
8
9
46-60
8
7
61-75
12
13
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.96
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.4 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
104%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-66%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

RWDM

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.21
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-8.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
107%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
123%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Patro Eisden

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.49
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.40
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
88%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.73
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).

Teams vs league

RWDMLigaPatro Eisden
Average goals in match 3.252.84 2.68
Both teams scored 63%55% 53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%54% 47%
Clean sheets 22%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 72%71% 68%
Goal after half-time 88%79% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.84
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.46
Home goals / match
1.37
Away goals / match
+7%
Home attack advantage
+6%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
71%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
50%
2 goals
22%
3 goals
8%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: RWDM 0 - 0 - 1 Patro Eisden. Average goals 1.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

The First Division B match finished RWDM 2:4 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

RWDM score 1.56 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.38. The First Division B average is 2.84 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 63% of RWDM's matches and 53% of Patro Eisden's.

What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in?

Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Patro Eisden 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Patro Eisden?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.