RWDM vs Patro Eisden: match statistics
Patro Eisden displays decidedly better form and defensive efficiency in away matches. The visitors have a positive goal difference on the road (+2) and concede an average of only 0.89 goals per match, while RWDM concedes an average of 1.9 goals in home games and holds a negative balance (-2). RWDM wins just 20% of matches at home and loses as many as 50%, pointing to serious problems in the host role. Patro Eisden has better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 points per match vs 1.0) and a significantly higher expected goals ratio in away matches (xG 1.76 vs xGA 1.03). Given RWDM's weakness at home and the visitors' defensive and offensive solidity, Patro Eisden has real chances of securing three points in this meeting.
RWDM vs Patro Eisden: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
RWDM played against Patro Eisden in First Division B (Belgium). The game was played on January 24, 2026. Final score: 2:4.
Recent form
RWDM has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Patro Eisden has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
RWDM scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 1.79. Patro Eisden scores 1.16 and allows 0.89. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 58% of RWDM's games and 42% of Patro Eisden's. The Over 2.5 rates are 63% and 37%, compared with league averages of 54% for BTTS and 52% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Patro Eisden has the higher season xG average, 1.73 to 1.44 per game. RWDM takes 12.6 shots per game, while Patro Eisden takes 16.3.
First-half and second-half trends
RWDM leads at halftime in 37% of its games and scores 0.84 goals per game after halftime. Patro Eisden leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.68 after halftime.
When the teams score
RWDM's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Patro Eisden, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division B games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 54% of games, and 52% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Patro Eisden displays decidedly better form and defensive efficiency in away matches. The visitors have a positive goal difference on the road (+2) and concede an average of only 0.89 goals per match, while RWDM concedes an average of 1.9 goals in home games and holds a negative balance (-2). RWDM wins just 20% of matches at home and loses as many as 50%, pointing to serious problems in the host role. Patro Eisden has better form in the last 5 matches (1.6 points per match vs 1.0) and a significantly higher expected goals ratio in away matches (xG 1.76 vs xGA 1.03). Given RWDM's weakness at home and the visitors' defensive and offensive solidity, Patro Eisden has real chances of securing three points in this meeting.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| RWDM | Patro Eisden | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 32% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.22 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Patro Eisden is 60% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - RWDM · 1.6 pts / game - Patro Eisden
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
RWDM is 41% better for: goals scored per game.
1.63 goals / game - RWDM · 1.16 goals / game - Patro Eisden
Patro Eisden is 101% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.79 goals / game - RWDM · 0.89 goals / game - Patro Eisden
RWDM scores in 74% of games (14 of 19 meczów), while Patro Eisden keeps a clean sheet in 37% (7 of 19 meczów).
Patro Eisden scores in 63% of games (12 of 19 meczów), while RWDM keeps a clean sheet in 16% (3 of 19 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - RWDM
Over / Under - Patro Eisden
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
RWDM is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / game - RWDM · 1.32 pts / game - Patro Eisden
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
RWDM - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 37% of games and wins 26%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Patro Eisden - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 47%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
RWDM
Patro Eisden
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division B).
Teams vs league
| RWDM | Liga | Patro Eisden | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.42 | 2.76 | ▼ 2.05 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 58% | 54% | ▼ 42% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 63% | 52% | ▼ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 16% | 26% | ▲ 37% |
| Goal before half-time | • 74% | 73% | ▼ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 79% | • 79% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from RWDM's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Patro Eisden. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
The First Division B match finished RWDM 2:4 Patro Eisden. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
RWDM score 1.63 goals per game on average and Patro Eisden 1.16. The First Division B average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 52% of games. Both teams score in 58% of RWDM's matches and 42% of Patro Eisden's.
What form are RWDM and Patro Eisden in?
Over the last 5 games RWDM have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Patro Eisden 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for RWDM vs Patro Eisden?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for RWDM vs Patro Eisden: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.