Sanat Naft vs Damash Gilanian: match statistics
Sanat Naft is displaying significantly superior form, sitting 3rd in the table with an impressive record of 7 wins and just 2 losses this season. The hosts remain unbeaten at home (56% wins, 44% draws, 0% losses), with their last 5 home fixtures yielding 4 victories and 1 draw. Damash Gilanian languishes in last place (18th), winless this season (0 wins, 8 draws, 9 losses) and suffering from disastrous away form—0% away wins and a goal difference of -6. The disparity in quality is evident in the xG statistics: Sanat Naft generates 1.13 xG at home while conceding only 0.7 xG, whereas Damash averages a mere 0.93 xG on the road while conceding 1.41 xG. Given the hosts' dominance across all metrics and the visitors' dismal condition, a Sanat Naft victory is highly probable.
Sanat Naft vs Damash Gilanian: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sanat Naft played against Damash Gilanian in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on January 20, 2026. Final score: 4:0.
Recent form
Sanat Naft has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Damash Gilanian has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Sanat Naft scores 0.94 goals per game and allows 0.59. Damash Gilanian scores 0.47 and allows 1.35. Games in this league average 1.49 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 47% of Sanat Naft's games and 47% of Damash Gilanian's. The Over 2.5 rates are 24% and 29%, compared with league averages of 32% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sanat Naft has the higher season xG average, 1.20 to 0.88 per game. Sanat Naft takes 6.8 shots per game, while Damash Gilanian takes 2.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 6% of its games and scores 0.71 goals per game after halftime. Damash Gilanian leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sanat Naft's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Damash Gilanian, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.49 goals. Both teams score in 32% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sanat Naft is displaying significantly superior form, sitting 3rd in the table with an impressive record of 7 wins and just 2 losses this season. The hosts remain unbeaten at home (56% wins, 44% draws, 0% losses), with their last 5 home fixtures yielding 4 victories and 1 draw. Damash Gilanian languishes in last place (18th), winless this season (0 wins, 8 draws, 9 losses) and suffering from disastrous away form—0% away wins and a goal difference of -6. The disparity in quality is evident in the xG statistics: Sanat Naft generates 1.13 xG at home while conceding only 0.7 xG, whereas Damash averages a mere 0.93 xG on the road while conceding 1.41 xG. Given the hosts' dominance across all metrics and the visitors' dismal condition, a Sanat Naft victory is highly probable.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sanat Naft | Damash Gilanian | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 27% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.44 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.89 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sanat Naft is 450% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 0.4 pts / game - Damash Gilanian
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
0.94 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 0.47 goals / game - Damash Gilanian
Sanat Naft is 129% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.59 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 1.35 goals / game - Damash Gilanian
Sanat Naft scores in 71% of games (12 of 17 meczów), while Damash Gilanian keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).
Damash Gilanian scores in 47% of games (8 of 17 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 47% (8 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
Over / Under - Damash Gilanian
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sanat Naft is 69% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 0.59 pts / game - Damash Gilanian
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 41%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Damash Gilanian - second-half results
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sanat Naft
Damash Gilanian
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Sanat Naft | Liga | Damash Gilanian | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.53 | 1.49 | ▲ 1.82 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 47% | 32% | ▲ 47% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 24% | 21% | ▲ 29% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 45% | ▼ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 35% | 46% | ▲ 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 65% | 57% | ▲ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Sanat Naft's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Damash Gilanian. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Damash Gilanian?
The Azadegan League match finished Sanat Naft 4:0 Damash Gilanian. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Damash Gilanian?
Sanat Naft score 0.94 goals per game on average and Damash Gilanian 0.47. The Azadegan League average is 1.49 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 47% of Sanat Naft's matches and 47% of Damash Gilanian's.
What form are Sanat Naft and Damash Gilanian in?
Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Damash Gilanian 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Damash Gilanian?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.