Iran - Azadegan LeagueTakhti StadiumData current as of 23 July 2026

Sanat Naft vs Mes Kerman: match statistics

Sanat Naft crest
Sanat Naft
1 : 0half-time 0:0
Mes Kerman crest
Mes Kerman

Sanat Naft vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sanat Naft play Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The match date is 11 July 2026 at 18:00. Venue: Takhti Stadium. Final score: 1:0.

Current form

Sanat Naft: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Mes Kerman: 1-3-1, 1.20 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sanat Naft scores 1.09 and concedes 0.62 goals per match. Mes Kerman scores 0.68 and concedes 0.53. League average: 1.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sanat Naft 38%, Mes Kerman 26%. Over 2.5: Sanat Naft 26%, Mes Kerman 15%. League level: BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

xG, shots and style

Mes Kerman has higher xG: 1.10 vs 1.09. Sanat Naft: 3.7 shots per match, Mes Kerman: 3.6.

Match halves

Sanat Naft: half-time lead 12%, second-half goals 0.76. Mes Kerman: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.35.

Goals by minute

Sanat Naft: 46-60 (9 goals). Mes Kerman: 76-90+ (7 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Azadegan League: 1.59 goals per match, BTTS 30%, Over 2.5 22%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 100%.

Match description

Sanat Naft is the favorite: they sit 4th and have scored 34 goals this season versus Mes Kerman’s 20, and at home they average 1.31 goals per match compared to the visitors’ 0.69 on the road. The hosts create significantly more chances — on average 9.2 shots and 2.4 on target per home game versus 4.25 and 1.75 for Mes — and average xG is 1.08 for Sanat vs 0.68 for Mes, indicating higher quality scoring opportunities. Mes Kerman, however, show statistically solid defensive numbers away — only 0.5 goals conceded per away match and 56% clean sheets, but their away xG against is 1.21 and the visitors fail to score in 44% of away games, suggesting the low goals conceded may be down to goalkeeper form or luck. In the last 5 matches Sanat have averaged 1.6 pts (2 wins, 2 draws, 1 loss), while Mes are on a run of 5 draws and 1.0 pt per game, so superiority in shots, xG and goal output favors the hosts, with a moderate risk of a draw.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
1 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

-1Possession (%)-1
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
-1Shots-1
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
-1Shots on target-1
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0xG0
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
-1Corners-1
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0Dangerous attacks0
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
-1Fouls-1
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
-1Cards-1
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

Sanat NaftMes Kerman
1.09Goals scored / match0.68
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.62Goals conceded / match0.53
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
24%Average possession26%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.94Shots on target / match1.35
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

3.68Shots per match3.59
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.94Shots on target1.35
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
29.6%Shot conversion18.9%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
24%Possession26%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
1.09xG for1.1
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.84xG against1.03
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

Shooting quality

Sanat Naft: Counter-attackingMes Kerman: Counter-attacking
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
Accuracy (shots on target)26%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.300.31
Finishing (goals per shot on target)1.160.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sanat Naft is 83% better for: last-5 form.

2.2 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 1.2 pts / match - Mes Kerman

Sanat Naft
DDWWW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
47% W35% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
16-12-6
1.76 pts / match · goal difference +16
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
10-6-1
Last 5 at home
2-2-1
DWLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.06Opponent xG: 0.67BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
Mes Kerman
DDDLW
Season result split
29% W44% R26% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-15-9
1.32 pts / match · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
5-7-5
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DWDDL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.87Opponent xG: 1.58BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sanat Naft is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.09 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 0.68 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Mes Kerman is 17% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.62 goals / match - Sanat Naft · 0.53 goals / match - Mes Kerman

Sanat Naft scoring profile: mixed

Sanat Naft scores in 65% of matches (22 of 34 matches), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 56% (19 of 34 matches).

Mes Kerman scoring profile: mixed

Mes Kerman scores in 53% of matches (18 of 34 matches), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

37Goals scored (season)23
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
21Goals conceded (season)18
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
1.71Average goals in match1.21
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
8Goals scored (last 5)5
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal53%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
29%2 goals12%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
9%3 goals3%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
6%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

How often they concede at least...

53%1 goal44%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
9%2 goals9%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0%3 goals0%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0%4 goals0%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

30%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time6%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
18%Scored in both halves6%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS12%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS3%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
40%BTTS - last 540%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

41%Min. 1 goal before half-time35%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
21%Min. 2 goals before half-time9%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

2nd half

65%Min. 1 goal after half-time56%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
26%Min. 2 goals after half-time12%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
12%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Mes Kerman is 14% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.09 pts / match - Sanat Naft · 1.24 pts / match - Mes Kerman

Sanat Naft - half-time state
12% leading74% draw15% trailing
Mes Kerman - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.09Points per match (1st half)1.24
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.32Goals scored (1st half)0.24
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.35Goals conceded (1st half)0.21
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.68Average goals (1st half)0.44
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
68%Clean sheet before half-time82%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
74%No goal before half-time76%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

After half-time (2nd half)

1.85Points per match (2nd half)1.24
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.76Goals scored (2nd half)0.35
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
0.26Goals conceded (2nd half)0.32
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
1.03Average goals (2nd half)0.68
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
74%Clean sheet after half-time68%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman
44%No goal after half-time68%
Sanat NaftMes Kerman

Sanat Naft - second-half results

47% W44% R9% P
37
Half-time points
11
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
63
Second-half points
+17
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.09
PPG before half-time
Lead holding392%

Leads at half-time in 12% of matches and wins 47%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Mes Kerman - second-half results

24% W53% R24% P
42
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
42
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding161%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 29%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sanat Naft - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.802.20
Goals scored / match1.00.6
Goals conceded / match0.40.0
Average goals in match1.40.6
1 goal60%60%
2 goals40%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+3+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 5
Mes Kerman - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.60
Goals scored / match0.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.00.6
Average goals in match0.20.8
1 goal20%60%
2 goals0%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%40%
No goal80%80%
Goal difference+1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sanat Naft
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
4
3
16-30
6
7
31-45
9
3
46-60
8
6
61-75
9
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

Mes Kerman
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
1
0
16-30
4
5
31-45
5
2
46-60
0
4
61-75
7
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.46
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 0.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
32%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+37%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
16%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sanat Naft

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.25
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.22
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-17.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
0.00
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
121%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
90%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.44
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
24% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 3% come in the first quarter-hour.
24%

Mes Kerman

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-18.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.42
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.50
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.12
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
30% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
30%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).

Teams vs league

Sanat NaftLigaMes Kerman
Average goals in match 1.711.59 1.21
Both teams scored 38%30% 26%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%22% 15%
Clean sheets 47%46% 56%
Goal before half-time 41%46% 35%
Goal after half-time 65%57% 56%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.59
Average goals per match
30%
Both teams scored
22%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
46%
Clean sheets
0.90
Home goals / match
0.69
Away goals / match
+30%
Home attack advantage
+23%
Home defence advantage
+17%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
46%
1 goal
15%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
57%
1 goal
21%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
1%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Sanat Naft 0 - 1 - 0 Mes Kerman. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Mes Kerman?

The Azadegan League match finished Sanat Naft 1:0 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Mes Kerman?

Sanat Naft score 1.09 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.68. The Azadegan League average is 1.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 22% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Sanat Naft's matches and 26% of Mes Kerman's.

What form are Sanat Naft and Mes Kerman in?

Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Mes Kerman 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Mes Kerman?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sanat Naft vs Mes Kerman: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.