Sanat Naft vs Mes Soongoun: match statistics
Sanat Naft vs Mes Soongoun: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sanat Naft played against Mes Soongoun in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on May 27, 2026. Final score: 1:0.
Recent form
Sanat Naft has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Mes Soongoun has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Sanat Naft scores 1.04 goals per game and allows 0.56. Mes Soongoun scores 0.33 and allows 1.13. Games in this league average 1.48 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Sanat Naft's games and 8% of Mes Soongoun's. The Over 2.5 rates are 28% and 21%, compared with league averages of 31% for BTTS and 21% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mes Soongoun has the higher season xG average, 1.55 to 1.20 per game. Sanat Naft takes 4.3 shots per game, while Mes Soongoun takes 4.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Sanat Naft leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.80 goals per game after halftime. Mes Soongoun leads at halftime in 13% and scores 0.21 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sanat Naft's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). For Mes Soongoun, it is minutes 46-60 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.48 goals. Both teams score in 31% of games, and 21% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sanat Naft are the clear favorites: they sit 3rd in the table and at home average 1.46 goals scored vs only 0.54 conceded per match, with home xG 1.13 compared to opponents’ 0.7. Mes Soongoun are 16th and score just 0.17 goals per away game, failing to score in 83% of their away matches, with away xG 0.92. Sanat generates more chances: 9.63 shots and 2.88 on target per home match versus 7 shots and 2.2 on target for the visitors, converting at 14% vs 3% for the guests. Over the last five fixtures, Sanat have scored 4 goals, with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, averaging 1.6 points per game, while Mes Soongoun have scored 3 goals in their last 5, recording 2 wins and 3 draws and averaging 1.8 points per game; however their away goals are scarce. Sanat also have a 62% home win rate and 46% clean sheets, whereas Mes suffer 67% defeats on the road and an away goal difference of -18, so I forecast a home victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Season statistics clearly point against BTTS: Sanat Naft has season BTTS only 15%, Mes Soongoun 8%, vs league average BTTS 31%. The home side creates significantly more chances (xG 1.92 vs 0.92, 6.5 vs 2.2 shots on target and 13.83 vs 7.0 shots), have scored 26 goals and conceded 14, while the visitors have only 9 goals this season. Mes Soongoun averages 0.17 goals per match and has scored 3 goals in the last 5 matches (0.6 avg), indicating major finishing issues. Clean sheets further favor the 'No' scenario — Sanat Naft have 46% of matches without conceding, Mes Soongoun 33%, and BTTS in the last 5 matches was only 20% for both teams. Considering the visitors' low efficiency (~3% conversion), the home xG advantage and season BTTS trend, I assess BTTS 'No' probability at 85% and 'Yes' at 15%.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Average xG indicates higher goal potential: the home side have xG 1.92, the visitors 0.92, totaling 2.84 xG. Actual average goals are much lower — Sanat Naft score 0.54 goals per match, Mes Soongoun 0.17 (total 0.71) with conversion rates 4.0% and 3.0% and average shots 13.83 and 7.0. Considering xG and actual goals and form from the last 5 matches (averages 0.8 and 0.6 goals), I applied a 70% weight to xG and 30% to actual averages, yielding expected 1.36 goals for the home team and 0.71 for the visitors (total 2.07). With that expected total, probability for Over 1.5 is about 61%, Over 2.5 about 34%, and Over 3.5 about 15% — therefore the strongest signal is Over 1.5. Additionally, Sanat Naft average 6.5 shots on target while the visitors only 2.2, which supports a home attacking edge and increases the chance of at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I project an X/1 scenario (draw at half-time, home win at full-time) because the hosts were level at the break in 58% of matches and simultaneously display superior seasonal metrics: on average 1.38 points per match versus 0.50 for the visitors and xG of 1.92 compared to 0.92. Sanat Naft averages 6.5 shots on target versus 2.2 for Mes Soongoun and 13.83 total shots versus 7.0, with average goals 0.54 versus 0.17 and conversion rates of 4% versus 3%, indicating the hosts create significantly more opportunities. Second-half data reinforces this forecast: the hosts have accumulated 18 points and average 1.5 points in second halves, while the visitors have 4 points and 0.33 points, so Sanat Naft more frequently produces a turnaround after the break. The first half is low-scoring (the hosts score an average of 0.17 goals by half-time and 75% of their first halves end with a clean sheet), which explains the high incidence of HT draws and the conversion of that draw into a home victory in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sanat Naft | Mes Soongoun | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 30% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.28 | 0.38 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.81 | 0.23 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mes Soongoun is 13% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 1.8 pts / game - Mes Soongoun
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sanat Naft is 215% better for: goals scored per game.
1.04 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 0.33 goals / game - Mes Soongoun
Sanat Naft is 102% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.56 goals / game - Sanat Naft · 1.13 goals / game - Mes Soongoun
Sanat Naft scores in 64% of games (16 of 25 meczów), while Mes Soongoun keeps a clean sheet in 42% (10 of 24 meczów).
Mes Soongoun scores in 29% of games (7 of 24 meczów), while Sanat Naft keeps a clean sheet in 48% (12 of 25 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sanat Naft
Over / Under - Mes Soongoun
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sanat Naft is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / game - Sanat Naft · 0.96 pts / game - Mes Soongoun
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sanat Naft - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Mes Soongoun - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 13% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 100% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -8 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sanat Naft
Mes Soongoun
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Sanat Naft | Liga | Mes Soongoun | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 1.60 | 1.48 | • 1.46 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 40% | 31% | ▼ 8% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 28% | 21% | • 21% |
| Clean sheets | • 48% | 47% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 36% | 45% | ▼ 42% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 64% | 54% | • 54% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sanat Naft's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Mes Soongoun. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sanat Naft vs Mes Soongoun?
The Azadegan League match finished Sanat Naft 1:0 Mes Soongoun. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sanat Naft vs Mes Soongoun?
Sanat Naft score 1.04 goals per game on average and Mes Soongoun 0.33. The Azadegan League average is 1.48 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 21% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Sanat Naft's matches and 8% of Mes Soongoun's.
What form are Sanat Naft and Mes Soongoun in?
Over the last 5 games Sanat Naft have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Mes Soongoun 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sanat Naft vs Mes Soongoun?
The statistical background for Sanat Naft vs Mes Soongoun — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


