Sandnes Ulf vs Moss: match statistics
Sandnes Ulf vs Moss: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sandnes Ulf played against Moss in First Division (Norway). The game was played on September 20, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Sandnes Ulf has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Moss has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Sandnes Ulf scores 1.41 goals per game and allows 1.82. Moss scores 1.64 and allows 2.32. Games in this league average 3.82 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's games and 86% of Moss's. The Over 2.5 rates are 45% and 91%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 72% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Moss has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.43 per game. Sandnes Ulf takes 11.9 shots per game, while Moss takes 13.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Sandnes Ulf leads at halftime in 27% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Moss leads at halftime in 18% and scores 0.95 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sandnes Ulf's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Moss, it is minutes 46-60 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
First Division games average 3.82 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 72% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sandnes Ulf have an identical record to Moss across their last five matches: 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 defeats, but they will play at home. The hosts average 1.64 goals scored at home with an xG of 1.59, while Moss concede as many as 2.45 goals per away match and have failed to keep a single clean sheet. The visitors can be dangerous in attack, averaging 1.73 goals scored away from home, but their defensive xG against stands at 1.79 compared with Sandnes Ulf’s 1.20 at home. Moss have lost 64% of their away matches, while Sandnes Ulf win 36% of their home fixtures and average 5.64 shots on target per match, more than their opponents’ 5.18. An open game with goals from both sides is expected, but Moss’s poor away defense gives the hosts a slight edge.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
BTTS - Yes is strongly supported by the season data: Sandnes Ulf have seen both teams score in 91% of their matches, while the figure for Moss is 82%, compared with the league average of 64%. The hosts have failed to keep a clean sheet in every match, while Moss have a 0% clean-sheet rate, clearly increasing the likelihood of goals at both ends. Sandnes Ulf score an average of 1.55 goals and concede 2.18, while Moss score 1.73 and allow their opponents 2.45 goals per match. Recent form also points to an open game: across their last five appearances, the teams averaged 1.6 and 2.0 goals respectively, while their xG against stood at 1.82 and 1.67. Sandnes Ulf’s BTTS rate dropping to 60% over their last five matches reduces confidence in the pick, but the profile of both weak defenses strongly points to a scenario in which each team scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Both teams have a profile highly conducive to goals: Sandnes Ulf score an average of 1.55 goals, while Moss score 1.73. At the same time, the hosts concede as many as 2.18 goals per match, compared with 2.45 for the visitors. The xG figures also point to an open game, with both teams’ attacks generating 1.60 xG, while Moss allow opponents 1.79 xG. At least 2 goals were scored in 91% of Sandnes Ulf matches and in all of Moss’s games, while the 2.5-goal line was covered in 82% and 100% of cases, respectively. In addition, Moss have scored 10 and conceded 10 goals in their last 5 matches, making Over 1.5 the strongest option based on the combination of effective attacks and weak defensive performances.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sandnes Ulf has a relatively stronger first-half profile: they led at the break in 27% of matches, compared with just 9% for Moss, while in their last five games the hosts were ahead after 45 minutes in 40% of cases. At the same time, Moss frequently starts poorly, having trailed at half-time in 55% of matches, which reinforces the scenario of a home advantage in the first half. Across the season as a whole, however, both teams have weak defensive profiles: Sandnes Ulf concede an average of 2.18 goals per match, compared with 2.45 for Moss, with opponents recording xG figures of 1.62 and 1.79, respectively. Moss score an average of 1.73 goals per game, compared with 1.55 for Sandnes Ulf, while their goalscoring output has risen to 2.0 goals per match over the last five rounds. The second half is also crucial: Moss average 1.0 goal in the second half and won it in 60% of their last five matches, whereas Sandnes Ulf lost the second half in 60% of cases. Therefore, the most likely HT/FT outcome is a turnaround from 1 to 2.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sandnes Ulf | Moss | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 37% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.32 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Moss is 16% better for: goals scored per game.
1.41 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 1.64 goals / game - Moss
Sandnes Ulf is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.82 goals / game - Sandnes Ulf · 2.32 goals / game - Moss
Sandnes Ulf scores in 73% of games (16 of 22 games), while Moss keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 games).
Moss scores in 91% of games (20 of 22 games), while Sandnes Ulf keeps a clean sheet in 23% (5 of 22 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sandnes Ulf
Over / Under - Moss
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sandnes Ulf is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / game - Sandnes Ulf · 0.86 pts / game - Moss
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sandnes Ulf - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Moss - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.2 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sandnes Ulf
Moss
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (First Division).
Teams vs league
| Sandnes Ulf | Liga | Moss | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.23 | 3.82 | ▲ 3.95 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 64% | ▲ 86% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 45% | 72% | ▲ 91% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 23% | 19% | ▼ 5% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 77% | ▲ 82% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 95% | 89% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sandnes Ulf's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Moss. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sandnes Ulf vs Moss?
The First Division match finished Sandnes Ulf 1:2 Moss. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Sandnes Ulf vs Moss?
Sandnes Ulf score 1.41 goals per game on average and Moss 1.64. The First Division average is 3.82 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 72% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sandnes Ulf's matches and 86% of Moss's.
What form are Sandnes Ulf and Moss in?
Over the last 5 games Sandnes Ulf have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Moss 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sandnes Ulf vs Moss?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Sandnes Ulf vs Moss: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.