South Korea - K League 1Data current as of October 17, 2026

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: match statistics

Sangju Sangmu crest
Sangju Sangmu
0 : 1half-time 0:1
Anyang crest
Anyang

Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Sangju Sangmu played against Anyang in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Final score: 0:1.

Recent form

Sangju Sangmu has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. Anyang has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Sangju Sangmu scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 1.20. Anyang scores 1.27 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 60% of Sangju Sangmu's games and 73% of Anyang's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 50%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Sangju Sangmu has the higher season xG average, 1.53 to 1.25 per game. Sangju Sangmu takes 13.0 shots per game, while Anyang takes 9.9.

First-half and second-half trends

Sangju Sangmu leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.57 goals per game after halftime. Anyang leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.70 after halftime.

When the teams score

Sangju Sangmu's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). For Anyang, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

K League 1 games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

A draw looks the most likely outcome: Sangju Sangmu have drawn 71% of their home matches and shared the points three times in their last five games. The hosts create more chances than their goal tally suggests — their average home xG is 1.67, yet they score only 1 goal per match. Anyang are more clinical away from home, averaging 1.4 goals and converting 14% of their shots, compared with the hosts’ 7%. However, the visitors’ defense allows chances worth an average xG of 1.81 away from home, giving Sangju an opportunity despite their lower conversion rate. Both teams have won just one of their last five matches, so neither comes into this game with a clear advantage in terms of recent form.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams have seen BTTS in 73% of their matches, well above the league average of 53%. Sangju Sangmu have yet to keep a clean sheet and concede an average of 1.8 goals per match, boosting Anyang’s chances of scoring. The hosts also have attacking credentials: their average xG is 1.19, while their opponents allow chances worth 1.81 xG per match. In their last five matches, BTTS landed in 60% of Sangju’s games and 80% of Anyang’s, with the teams conceding an average of 1.4 and 1.8 goals respectively over that period. The risk to BTTS - Yes is that Sangju have failed to score in 27% of their matches; however, the teams’ shared tendency to concede supports goals at both ends.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals: this line has been cleared in 87% of Sangju Sangmu matches and 80% of Anyang matches. The hosts concede an average of 1.8 goals, while the visitors score 1.4, giving Anyang a clear basis to add to the scoreline. On the other hand, Sangju’s xG stands at 1.19, while their opponents concede an average of 1.81 xG, which also points to chances for the hosts. The Over 2.5 goals line is less certain, having landed in 60% of Sangju matches but only 40% of Anyang matches; with a projected total of 2.85 goals, the value remains on the lower line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: Anyang were level at the break in 67% of their matches, compared with 47% for Sangju Sangmu. The visitors concede an average of just 0.33 goals before half-time, against 0.73 for the hosts, making an early Sangju lead difficult to call. Over the full match, however, Anyang have the advantage: they score an average of 1.40 goals compared with Sangju’s 1.13, while the hosts concede 1.80 goals per game. The average of 1.73 goals in the second halves of both teams’ matches also points to a possible decision after the break, as does the fact that Sangju concede an average of 1.07 goals in that period. The X/2 pick is not a certainty, as Sangju have drawn three of their last five matches, but the combination of frequent half-time draws and the visitors’ better goal record gives it the strongest backing.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

60Possession (%)40
Sangju SangmuAnyang
11Shots12
Sangju SangmuAnyang
6Shots on target7
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.66xG1.74
Sangju SangmuAnyang
9Corners1
Sangju SangmuAnyang
75Dangerous attacks67
Sangju SangmuAnyang
15Fouls16
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1Cards2
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Sangju SangmuAnyang
1Goals scored / game1.27
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.2Goals allowed / game1.57
Sangju SangmuAnyang
56%Average possession45%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.9Shots on target / game3.57
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13Shots per game9.87
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3.9Shots on target3.57
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7.7%Shot conversion12.8%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
56%Possession45%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.53xG for1.25
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.37xG against1.75
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Shooting quality

Sangju Sangmu: BalancedAnyang: Counter-attacking
Sangju SangmuAnyang
Accuracy (shots on target)30%36%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Sangju Sangmu is 20% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1 pts / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu
LDDDW
Season result split
17% W60% D23% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-18-7
1.10 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-3-1
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-10-3
Last 5 at home
1-4-0
WDDDD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.77Opponent xG: 1.63BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Anyang
DLLDW
Season result split
30% W37% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
9-11-10
1.27 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-6-4
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LLDLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.26Opponent xG: 1.66BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Anyang is 27% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1.27 goals / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.2 goals / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1.57 goals / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu scoring profile: very strong

Sangju Sangmu scores in 70% of games (21 of 30 games), while Anyang keeps a clean sheet in 10% (3 of 30 games).

Anyang scoring profile: very strong

Anyang scores in 80% of games (24 of 30 games), while Sangju Sangmu keeps a clean sheet in 27% (8 of 30 games).

30Goals scored (season)38
Sangju SangmuAnyang
36Goals conceded (season)47
Sangju SangmuAnyang
2.2Average goals per game2.83
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7Goals scored (last 5)6
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7Goals conceded (last 5)9
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they score at least...

70%1 goal80%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
23%2 goals33%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7%3 goals7%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals3%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

How often they concede at least...

73%1 goal90%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
37%2 goals37%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
10%3 goals17%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0%4 goals3%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

53%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time20%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7%BTTS in both halves7%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
13%Scored in both halves27%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

BTTS and goal count

27%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
60%BTTS - last 580%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

57%Min. 1 goal before half-time63%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
3%Min. 3 goals before half-time7%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

2nd half

73%Min. 1 goal after half-time87%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
43%Min. 2 goals after half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
10%Min. 3 goals after half-time23%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Anyang is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.27 pts / game - Sangju Sangmu · 1.37 pts / game - Anyang

Sangju Sangmu - half-time state
23% leading57% draw20% trailing
Anyang - half-time state
27% leading57% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.27Points per game (1st half)1.37
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.57
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.53
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.93Average goals (1st half)1.1
Sangju SangmuAnyang
63%Clean sheet before half-time63%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
63%No goal before half-time53%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

After half-time (2nd half)

1.1Points per game (2nd half)1
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.57Goals scored (2nd half)0.7
Sangju SangmuAnyang
0.7Goals conceded (2nd half)1.03
Sangju SangmuAnyang
1.27Average goals (2nd half)1.73
Sangju SangmuAnyang
40%Clean sheet after half-time27%
Sangju SangmuAnyang
53%No goal after half-time40%
Sangju SangmuAnyang

Sangju Sangmu - second-half results

20% W50% D30% L
38
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
33
Second-half points
-4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.27
PPG before half-time
Lead holding74%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 17%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Anyang - second-half results

20% W40% D40% L
41
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
30
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.37
PPG before half-time
Lead holding111%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.5

Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Sangju Sangmu - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.80
Goals scored / game0.80.6
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game1.01.8
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+3-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Anyang - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.600.60
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference+1-4
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Sangju Sangmu
ScoredConceded
4
4
0-15
5
2
16-30
4
9
31-45
3
5
46-60
6
9
61-75
8
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

Anyang
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
6
2
16-30
6
8
31-45
7
11
46-60
6
11
61-75
8
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.52
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.3 : 1.2
Estimated goal split
home : away
103%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
67%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+27%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
56%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Sangju Sangmu

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.16
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.36
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.53
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.17
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
85%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
94%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

Anyang

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.20
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.02
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.18
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
133%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.27
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).

Teams vs league

Sangju SangmuLigaAnyang
Average goals per game▼ 2.202.45▲ 2.83
Both teams scored▲ 60%53%▲ 73%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%46%▲ 50%
Clean sheets▼ 27%29%▼ 10%
Goal before half-time▼ 57%61%▲ 63%
Goal after half-time▼ 73%77%▲ 87%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.45
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
29%
Clean sheets
1.18
Home goals / game
1.27
Away goals / game
+-7%
Home attack advantage
+-8%
Home defensive advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
61%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
7%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
46%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AnyangYellow cardBreno Herculano Almeida
  2. Sangju SangmuYellow cardMin-Kyu Kim
  3. AnyangSubstitutionOn: Geon-Joo ChoiOff: Hyun-Woo Chae
  4. Sangju SangmuSubstitutionOn: Jae-Min JeongOff: Min-Kyu Kang
  5. AnyangSubstitutionOn: Ji-Hoon KimOff: Young-Chan Kim
  6. AnyangSubstitutionOn: Gang KimOff: Ivan Jukić
  7. AnyangYellow cardJin-Yong Lee

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Sangju Sangmu's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Anyang. Games average 3.20 goals, and both teams scored in 80% of them.

Anyang
2 : 2
Sangju Sangmu
Sangju Sangmu
1 : 1
Anyang
FC Anyang
4 : 1
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC
1 : 0
FC Anyang
FC Anyang
1 : 3
Sangju Sangmu Phoenix FC

FAQ

What was the result of Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

The K League 1 match finished Sangju Sangmu 0:1 Anyang. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sangju Sangmu and Anyang?

In the last 5 head-to-head matches Sangju Sangmu won 2, Anyang won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 80% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

Sangju Sangmu score 1.00 goals per game on average and Anyang 1.27. The K League 1 average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 60% of Sangju Sangmu's matches and 73% of Anyang's.

What form are Sangju Sangmu and Anyang in?

Over the last 5 games Sangju Sangmu have a 1-3-1 record (1.20 points per game) and Anyang 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang?

The statistical background for Sangju Sangmu vs Anyang — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.