Seongnam vs Seoul E-Land: match statistics
Seongnam vs Seoul E-Land: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Seongnam played against Seoul E-Land in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Seongnam Tancheon Sports Complex. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Seongnam has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Seoul E-Land has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Seongnam scores 1.10 goals per game and allows 1.19. Seoul E-Land scores 1.82 and allows 1.23. Games in this league average 2.72 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Seongnam's games and 68% of Seoul E-Land's. The Over 2.5 rates are 43% and 73%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Seoul E-Land has the higher season xG average, 1.66 to 1.56 per game. Seongnam takes 12.5 shots per game, while Seoul E-Land takes 13.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Seongnam leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.52 goals per game after halftime. Seoul E-Land leads at halftime in 27% and scores 1.23 after halftime.
When the teams score
Seongnam's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). For Seoul E-Land, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.72 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seoul E-Land sit 2nd, while Seongnam are only 10th, with 12 and 6 wins respectively across the season. The visitors are unbeaten in their last five matches, collecting 11 points and scoring 10 goals, whereas Seongnam have recorded 2 wins and 2 defeats during that period, scoring just 6 goals. Away from home, Seoul E-Land average 1.55 goals per match from 5 shots on target, while the hosts score an average of once per game at home and have failed to score in 40% of their appearances. Seongnam have the higher home xG, 1.70 compared with 1.57, and concede only 0.9 goals per match, which increases the likelihood of a closely contested game. Nevertheless, the visitors win 55% of their away matches, while the hosts draw as many as 50% of their home fixtures, making a narrow Seoul E-Land victory the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seongnam have recorded BTTS in 82% of their matches, well above Seoul E-Land’s 55% and the league average of 63%. The hosts have failed to score in none of their matches this season, but have kept a clean sheet in only 18% of their outings, which significantly increases the likelihood of an away goal. Seoul E-Land have averaged 2.0 goals with an xG of 1.80 in their last 5 matches, while Seongnam have allowed opponents an xG of 1.53 over the same period. Although the visitors keep a clean sheet in 36% of their matches, Seongnam generate 1.74 xG at home, register 6.09 shots on target per match and score an average of 2.09 goals. The current BTTS rate stands at 60% for Seongnam and 80% for Seoul E-Land, making a goal for both teams more likely than a scenario in which at least one side fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seongnam average 2.09 total goals in home matches, while Seoul E-Land average 1.55 away from home, indicating a favorable profile for at least two goals. The hosts create an average of 1.74 xG, while the visitors allow 1.39 xG. Meanwhile, Seoul E-Land’s attack produces 1.57 xG, compared with 1.12 xG conceded by Seongnam. The 1.5-goal line has been covered in 91% of Seongnam’s matches and 73% of Seoul E-Land’s games, clearly more often than the 2.5-goal threshold, which stands at 82% and 64%, respectively. Recent form also supports goals: in their last five appearances, the visitors averaged 2.0 goals, while both teams had 60% of their matches finish with at least three goals. The strongest pick is Over 1.5 goals, as the high quality of chances created by both sides and the very frequent success of this line reduce the risk of a 0:0 or 1:0 result.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Seoul E-Land win at full-time, as the visitors have been level at the break in 73% of their matches this season and have gone into half-time tied in each of their last five games. Seongnam tend to start better, leading at the break in 45% of matches, but their recent form is weaker: they average 1.2 goals scored and have lost 40% of their last five fixtures. Seoul E-Land remain unbeaten over this period, recording a 60% win rate, scoring an average of 2.0 goals and conceding just 1.2 per game. After the break, the visitors’ advantage becomes clear, as they win the second half in 64% of matches and score an average of 1.18 goals during this period, while conceding just 0.55. Seongnam, meanwhile, concede an average of 1.0 goal after the interval, with as many as 8 of their goals conceded coming between the 76th and 90th minutes, which supports a late turnaround in favor of the visitors.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Seongnam | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Seoul E-Land is 22% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Seongnam · 2.2 pts / game - Seoul E-Land
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 65% better for: goals scored per game.
1.1 goals / game - Seongnam · 1.82 goals / game - Seoul E-Land
Seongnam scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 meczów), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 27% (6 of 22 meczów).
Seoul E-Land scores in 86% of games (19 of 22 meczów), while Seongnam keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seongnam
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seongnam is 9% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.48 pts / game - Seongnam · 1.36 pts / game - Seoul E-Land
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seongnam - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 29%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Seongnam
Seoul E-Land
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seongnam | Liga | Seoul E-Land | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.29 | 2.72 | ▲ 3.05 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 62% | ▲ 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 43% | 53% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 23% | ▲ 27% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 62% | 69% | • 68% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 67% | 78% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Seongnam's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Seoul E-Land. Games average 2.20 goals, and both teams scored in 40% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Seongnam vs Seoul E-Land?
The K League 2 match finished Seongnam 1:1 Seoul E-Land. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seongnam and Seoul E-Land?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Seongnam won 2, Seoul E-Land won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.20 goals, with both teams scoring in 40% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seongnam vs Seoul E-Land?
Seongnam score 1.10 goals per game on average and Seoul E-Land 1.82. The K League 2 average is 2.72 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Seongnam's matches and 68% of Seoul E-Land's.
What form are Seongnam and Seoul E-Land in?
Over the last 5 games Seongnam have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Seoul E-Land 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seongnam vs Seoul E-Land?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Seongnam vs Seoul E-Land: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


