Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: match statistics
Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Seoul E-Land played against Ansan Greeners in K League 2 (South Korea). The game was played on August 16, 2026. Venue: Mokdong Stadium. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Seoul E-Land has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.20 points per game. Ansan Greeners has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
Seoul E-Land scores 1.80 goals per game and allows 1.25. Ansan Greeners scores 1.05 and allows 1.85. Games in this league average 2.76 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 65% of Seoul E-Land's games and 65% of Ansan Greeners's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 60%, compared with league averages of 62% for BTTS and 55% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Seoul E-Land has the higher season xG average, 1.59 to 1.15 per game. Seoul E-Land takes 13.1 shots per game, while Ansan Greeners takes 8.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Seoul E-Land leads at halftime in 30% of its games and scores 1.20 goals per game after halftime. Ansan Greeners leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.60 after halftime.
When the teams score
Seoul E-Land's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Ansan Greeners, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 2 games average 2.76 goals. Both teams score in 62% of games, and 55% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Seoul E-Land sit 2nd, while Ansan Greeners are only 15th, with the hosts’ overall season record standing at 11 wins and 5 defeats compared to the visitors’ 5 wins and 11 losses. At home, Seoul E-Land average 2.11 goals per match and have failed to score in none of their games, whereas Ansan average just one goal away from home and have been held scoreless in 38% of their away appearances. The hosts’ superiority is also evident in chance creation: their average xG is 1.62, while Ansan generate 1.02 xG away from home and allow opponents as much as 2.07 xG. Seoul average 13 shots and 5.67 shots on target per home match, clearly more than Ansan’s 7.63 shots and 3.5 shots on target away from home. Although the hosts have conceded 10 goals in their last five matches, the visitors have scored only 4 during that period, making a Seoul E-Land win the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seoul E-Land have recorded BTTS in 83% of their matches this season and in 80% of their last five games, while also failing to keep a single clean sheet. The hosts concede an average of 2.0 goals per match, giving Ansan a realistic route to scoring despite their lower average of 1.0 goal per game. Ansan’s defense also favors opposition goals: they allow an average of 1.63 goals, while their average xG against is as high as 2.07. At the same time, Seoul E-Land have scored 2.0 goals per game in their last five appearances. The main risk to BTTS - Yes is Ansan’s weaker attacking output, having scored only 0.8 goals in their last five matches and recorded BTTS in 40% of them. However, the hosts’ highly vulnerable defense slightly tilts the prediction towards a Goal/Goal scenario.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seoul E-Land concede an average of 2.00 goals per match and have kept no clean sheets, which significantly increases Ansan Greeners’ scoring potential. The hosts create chances worth an average of 1.23 xG, while the visitors’ defense allows opponents 2.07 xG, so Seoul E-Land should have solid conditions to score at least once. In their last five matches, the hosts scored 10 goals and conceded 10, while Ansan also allowed 10 goals over the same period. The 1.5 line was exceeded in 92% of Seoul’s matches and 75% of Ansan’s, providing a considerably stronger signal than the more evenly balanced 2.5 line. The projected total of 2.70 goals indicates that Over 1.5 is the safest choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Seoul E-Land win after the match, as the hosts were level at the break in 60% of their last five games, while Ansan were trailing at half-time in as many as 80% of them. The opening phase should be relatively even: Seoul have averaged 0.4 goals before the break recently, compared with just 0.2 for Ansan. After half-time, the hosts clearly step up, scoring an average of 1.6 goals across their last five matches, compared with 0.6 for Ansan. Seoul’s advantage is also supported by their current form, with 2 wins and 2 draws in their last five games, while the visitors have won just once. Ansan’s defense allows opponents an average of 2.07 xG, which, combined with Seoul’s 1.23 xG created, increases the hosts’ chances of deciding the match after the break.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Seoul E-Land | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 44% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Seoul E-Land is 38% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / game - Seoul E-Land · 1.6 pts / game - Ansan Greeners
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Seoul E-Land is 71% better for: goals scored per game.
1.8 goals / game - Seoul E-Land · 1.05 goals / game - Ansan Greeners
Seoul E-Land is 48% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.25 goals / game - Seoul E-Land · 1.85 goals / game - Ansan Greeners
Seoul E-Land scores in 85% of games (17 of 20 games), while Ansan Greeners keeps a clean sheet in 10% (2 of 20 games).
Ansan Greeners scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 games), while Seoul E-Land keeps a clean sheet in 30% (6 of 20 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Seoul E-Land
Over / Under - Ansan Greeners
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Seoul E-Land is 65% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Seoul E-Land · 0.85 pts / game - Ansan Greeners
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Seoul E-Land - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 55%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Ansan Greeners - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 3.0 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 80% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -6 | +3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Seoul E-Land
Ansan Greeners
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 2).
Teams vs league
| Seoul E-Land | Liga | Ansan Greeners | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.05 | 2.76 | ▲ 2.90 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 65% | 62% | ▲ 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 75% | 55% | ▲ 60% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 30% | 23% | ▼ 10% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 69% | ▲ 80% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 78% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Seoul E-Land's perspective: 2 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Ansan Greeners. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?
The K League 2 match finished Seoul E-Land 3:1 Ansan Greeners. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Seoul E-Land and Ansan Greeners?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Seoul E-Land won 2, Ansan Greeners won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?
Seoul E-Land score 1.80 goals per game on average and Ansan Greeners 1.05. The K League 2 average is 2.76 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 65% of Seoul E-Land's matches and 65% of Ansan Greeners's.
What form are Seoul E-Land and Ansan Greeners in?
Over the last 5 games Seoul E-Land have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Ansan Greeners 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Seoul E-Land vs Ansan Greeners: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.