Romania - Liga ICluj ArenaData current as of September 20, 2026

Sepsi vs FCSB: match statistics

Sepsi crest
Sepsi
0 : 0half-time 0:0
FCSB crest
FCSB

Sepsi vs FCSB: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Sepsi played against FCSB in Liga I (Romania). The game was played on August 10, 2026. Venue: Cluj Arena. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Sepsi has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.33 points per game. FCSB has 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses, with 2.33 points per game.

Scoring records

Sepsi scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.67. FCSB scores 2.00 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 2.53 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Sepsi's games and 33% of FCSB's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 33%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 47% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FCSB has the higher season xG average, 1.99 to 1.22 per game. Sepsi takes 10.3 shots per game, while FCSB takes 18.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Sepsi leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. FCSB leads at halftime in 67% and scores 0.67 after halftime.

When the teams score

Sepsi's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). For FCSB, it is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Liga I games average 2.53 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 47% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FCSB lead the table, remaining unbeaten after three rounds (2 wins and a draw), while Sepsi have a 1-1-1 record and sit 10th. The visitors are clearly more dangerous in chance creation away from home, averaging 22 shots and 12 on target, with an xG of 2.41, compared with Sepsi’s 13 shots, 9 on target and xG of 1.78 at home. FCSB average 2 goals per game away from home, while Sepsi average 1, although both teams won their only match so far in their respective settings without conceding. The hosts’ recent run is weaker, with 1 win, 2 draws and 2 defeats, as well as a 3:5 goal difference across their last five matches, whereas FCSB scored 9 goals during that period. Sepsi have home advantage, but FCSB’s superior chance quality and more effective attack point towards an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

FCSB has very strong attacking potential, averaging 2.41 xG and recording 12 shots on target per match, making an away goal highly likely. At the same time, their defense has kept a clean sheet in 100% of matches so far, while allowing opponents just 1.14 xG, clearly limiting Sepsi’s chances. The hosts have scored only 0.6 goals per match across their last five games and recorded BTTS in 40% of cases, despite opponents creating an average of 1.92 xG against them. Sepsi may take advantage of FCSB conceding an average of 1.8 goals in their last five appearances, but the visitors’ season BTTS rate stands at 0%, making the BTTS - No outcome more likely—in other words, at least one team is expected not to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

FCSB creates a high volume of chances, averaging 22 shots, including 12 on target, with a high average xG of 2.41. However, Sepsi has scored just 0.6 goals per game over its last five matches, with an xG of 1.27, and none of those five games featured more than 2 goals. The visitors have kept a clean sheet in 100% of their away matches so far, limiting the hosts’ chances of significantly increasing the score. Although FCSB has averaged 1.8 goals scored per game in its last five matches, the 3.5 line requires four goals, and the visitors have stayed below it in 100% of their away matches so far. The strongest signal is therefore Under 3.5, supported by a forecast of 2.35 goals and Sepsi’s poor recent finishing.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

FCSB have a clear attacking edge: their average xG stands at 2.41 compared with Sepsi’s 1.78, while the visitors average 22 shots and 12 on target, versus 16.5 and 5.5 for the hosts. In their away matches so far, FCSB have won 100% of their games, kept a clean sheet in 100% of them, and held a lead at the break on every occasion, whereas Sepsi were ahead after 45 minutes in only 50% of their matches. However, the hosts are dangerous after the interval, averaging 1 goal in the second half, so turnaround or draw scenarios remain realistic. Although FCSB were trailing at half-time in as many as 60% of their last five matches, their superior creative quality and highly reliable defense, which has conceded 0 away goals this season, provide the strongest support for an HT/FT scenario of FCSB leading at the break and winning at full time (1/1).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
SepsiFCSB
14Shots14
SepsiFCSB
2Shots on target5
SepsiFCSB
1.3xG1.66
SepsiFCSB
8Corners5
SepsiFCSB
38Dangerous attacks58
SepsiFCSB
13Fouls12
SepsiFCSB
2Cards3
SepsiFCSB

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.67Goals scored / game2
SepsiFCSB
0.67Goals allowed / game0.67
SepsiFCSB
46%Average possession52%
SepsiFCSB
4.33Shots on target / game7.67
SepsiFCSB

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.33Shots per game18.33
SepsiFCSB
4.33Shots on target7.67
SepsiFCSB
6.5%Shot conversion10.9%
SepsiFCSB
46%Possession52%
SepsiFCSB
1.22xG for1.99
SepsiFCSB
2.15xG against1.62
SepsiFCSB

Shooting quality

Sepsi: BalancedFCSB: Attacking
SepsiFCSB
Accuracy (shots on target)42%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.150.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FCSB is 75% better for: last-5 form.

1.33 pts / game - Sepsi · 2.33 pts / game - FCSB

Sepsi
LWD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game · goal difference 0
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-1
1.33 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 at home
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.7Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.22Opponent xG: 2.15BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 0%
FCSB
WWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-0
2.33 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 1.99Opponent xG: 1.62BTTS: 33%Over 2.5: 33%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FCSB is 199% better for: goals scored per game.

0.67 goals / game - Sepsi · 2 goals / game - FCSB

Sepsi scoring profile: mixed

Sepsi scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while FCSB keeps a clean sheet in 67% (2 of 3 games).

FCSB scoring profile: very strong

FCSB scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Sepsi keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).

2Goals scored (season)6
SepsiFCSB
2Goals conceded (season)2
SepsiFCSB
1.33Average goals per game2.67
SepsiFCSB
2Goals scored (last 5)6
SepsiFCSB
2Goals conceded (last 5)2
SepsiFCSB

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
SepsiFCSB
0%2 goals100%
SepsiFCSB
0%3 goals0%
SepsiFCSB
0%4 goals0%
SepsiFCSB

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal33%
SepsiFCSB
0%2 goals33%
SepsiFCSB
0%3 goals0%
SepsiFCSB
0%4 goals0%
SepsiFCSB

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

33%BTTS at half-time0%
SepsiFCSB
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SepsiFCSB
0%Scored in both halves0%
SepsiFCSB

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
SepsiFCSB
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SepsiFCSB
33%BTTS - last 533%
SepsiFCSB

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
SepsiFCSB
33%Min. 2 goals before half-time100%
SepsiFCSB
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SepsiFCSB

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time33%
SepsiFCSB
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
SepsiFCSB
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SepsiFCSB

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FCSB is 20% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.67 pts / game - Sepsi · 2 pts / game - FCSB

Sepsi - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing
FCSB - half-time state
67% leading0% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.67Points per game (1st half)2
SepsiFCSB
0.67Goals scored (1st half)1.33
SepsiFCSB
0.33Goals conceded (1st half)0.67
SepsiFCSB
1Average goals (1st half)2
SepsiFCSB
67%Clean sheet before half-time67%
SepsiFCSB
33%No goal before half-time33%
SepsiFCSB

After half-time (2nd half)

0.67Points per game (2nd half)1.67
SepsiFCSB
0Goals scored (2nd half)0.67
SepsiFCSB
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0
SepsiFCSB
0.33Average goals (2nd half)0.67
SepsiFCSB
67%Clean sheet after half-time100%
SepsiFCSB
100%No goal after half-time67%
SepsiFCSB

Sepsi - second-half results

0% W67% D33% L
5
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
2
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

FCSB - second-half results

33% W67% D0% L
6
Half-time points
4
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
5
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
2.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 67% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.7

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sepsi - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.670.67
Goals scored / game0.70.0
Goals allowed / game0.30.3
Average goals per game1.00.3
1 goal67%33%
2 goals33%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%67%
No goal33%100%
Goal difference+1-1
Half-time: 33% leading - 67% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 67% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 33% - Half-time goals total: 2
FCSB - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.001.67
Goals scored / game1.30.7
Goals allowed / game0.70.0
Average goals per game2.00.7
1 goal100%33%
2 goals100%33%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet67%100%
No goal33%67%
Goal difference+2+2
Half-time: 67% leading - 0% draw - 33% trailing
2nd half: 33% won - 67% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 4

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Sepsi
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
1
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

FCSB
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
1
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.00
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.7 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
79%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Sepsi

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.93
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.93
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+1.48
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
35%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

FCSB

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.37
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.96
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.95
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
317%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
35%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.7
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga I).

Teams vs league

SepsiLigaFCSB
Average goals per game 1.332.53 2.67
Both teams scored 33%40% 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 0%47% 33%
Clean sheets 33%33% 67%
Goal before half-time 67%73% 100%
Goal after half-time 33%67% 33%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.53
Average goals per game
40%
Both teams scored
47%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
33%
Clean sheets
1.90
Home goals / game
0.63
Away goals / game
+202%
Home attack advantage
+67%
Home defensive advantage
+60%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
10%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SepsiYellow cardRobert Mihai Silaghi
  2. FCSBYellow cardAymen Boutoutaou
  3. FCSBSubstitutionOn: Octavian PopescuOff: Aymen Boutoutaou
  4. FCSBYellow cardValentin Iulian Crețu
  5. SepsiSubstitutionOn: Boris CmiljanićOff: Moses Mawa
  6. FCSBSubstitutionOn: Mihai TomaOff: Yuri Cisotti
  7. FCSBYellow cardFlorin Lucian Tănase

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Sepsi vs FCSB?

The Liga I match finished Sepsi 0:0 FCSB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Sepsi vs FCSB?

Sepsi score 0.67 goals per game on average and FCSB 2.00. The Liga I average is 2.53 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 47% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Sepsi's matches and 33% of FCSB's.

What form are Sepsi and FCSB in?

Over the last 5 games Sepsi have a 1-1-1 record (1.33 points per game) and FCSB 2-1-0 (2.33 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sepsi vs FCSB?

The statistical background for Sepsi vs FCSB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.