Servette vs Zürich: match statistics
Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams, with a slight advantage for a draw scenario. Servette presents exceptionally weak home form – just 14% victories at home and a series of five consecutive draws in recent matches, suggesting difficulties in breaking down rival defensive setups. Zürich also performs poorly away (29% wins, 0% clean sheets), but their last five matches show slightly better form (1.2 points per match) compared to the hosts (1.0 points). Both teams have a negative goal difference on their respective pitches, high rates of conceded goals, and similar xG values, which confirms a balanced offensive potential. Given Servette's tendency to draw at home (50% of matches) and the problems both teams have with keeping clean sheets, the most probable result is a split of points.
Servette vs Zürich: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Servette played against Zürich in Super League (Switzerland). The game was played on March 7, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Servette has 0 wins, 5 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Zürich has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Servette scores 1.61 goals per game and allows 1.86. Zürich scores 1.43 and allows 1.96. Games in this league average 3.27 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 75% of Servette's games and 68% of Zürich's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 79%, compared with league averages of 68% for BTTS and 67% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Zürich has the higher season xG average, 1.56 to 1.51 per game. Servette takes 13.0 shots per game, while Zürich takes 13.7.
First-half and second-half trends
Servette leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 1.04 goals per game after halftime. Zürich leads at halftime in 32% and scores 0.71 after halftime.
When the teams score
Servette's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Zürich, it is minutes 16-30 (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Super League games average 3.27 goals. Both teams score in 68% of games, and 67% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Statistical analysis indicates balanced chances for both teams, with a slight advantage for a draw scenario. Servette presents exceptionally weak home form – just 14% victories at home and a series of five consecutive draws in recent matches, suggesting difficulties in breaking down rival defensive setups. Zürich also performs poorly away (29% wins, 0% clean sheets), but their last five matches show slightly better form (1.2 points per match) compared to the hosts (1.0 points). Both teams have a negative goal difference on their respective pitches, high rates of conceded goals, and similar xG values, which confirms a balanced offensive potential. Given Servette's tendency to draw at home (50% of matches) and the problems both teams have with keeping clean sheets, the most probable result is a split of points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Servette | Zürich | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.38 | 0.28 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Zürich is 20% better for: last-5 form.
1 pts / game - Servette · 1.2 pts / game - Zürich
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Servette is 13% better for: goals scored per game.
1.61 goals / game - Servette · 1.43 goals / game - Zürich
Servette is 5% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.86 goals / game - Servette · 1.96 goals / game - Zürich
Servette scores in 86% of games (24 of 28 meczów), while Zürich keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 28 meczów).
Zürich scores in 75% of games (21 of 28 meczów), while Servette keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Servette
Over / Under - Zürich
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Zürich is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.89 pts / game - Servette · 1.25 pts / game - Zürich
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Servette - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Zürich - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 32% of games and wins 32%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (8 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (20). Late-goal balance (76-90): -13 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Servette
Zürich
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Super League).
Teams vs league
| Servette | Liga | Zürich | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.46 | 3.27 | ▲ 3.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 75% | 68% | • 68% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 61% | 67% | ▲ 79% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 19% | ▼ 7% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 79% | 76% | ▲ 86% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 86% | 82% | ▲ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Servette's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Zürich. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Servette vs Zürich?
The Super League match finished Servette 2:1 Zürich. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Servette and Zürich?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Servette won 0, Zürich won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Servette vs Zürich?
Servette score 1.61 goals per game on average and Zürich 1.43. The Super League average is 3.27 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 67% of games. Both teams score in 75% of Servette's matches and 68% of Zürich's.
What form are Servette and Zürich in?
Over the last 5 games Servette have a 0-5-0 record (1.00 points per game) and Zürich 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Servette vs Zürich?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Servette vs Zürich: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


