Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman: match statistics
Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shahrdari Noshahr played against Mes Kerman in Azadegan League (Iran). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
Shahrdari Noshahr has 0 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. Mes Kerman has 1 win, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 1.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Shahrdari Noshahr scores 0.53 goals per game and allows 0.83. Mes Kerman scores 0.63 and allows 0.53. Games in this league average 1.52 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 30% of Shahrdari Noshahr's games and 27% of Mes Kerman's. The Over 2.5 rates are 7% and 13%, compared with league averages of 30% for BTTS and 20% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mes Kerman has the higher season xG average, 1.10 to 1.02 per game. Shahrdari Noshahr takes 3.4 shots per game, while Mes Kerman takes 4.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Shahrdari Noshahr leads at halftime in 3% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Mes Kerman leads at halftime in 17% and scores 0.40 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shahrdari Noshahr's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Mes Kerman, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Azadegan League games average 1.52 goals. Both teams score in 30% of games, and 20% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict a draw (X). Both teams have very low goal output: Shahrdari scores an average of 0.64 goals per home match, while Mes Kerman scores 0.67 goals per away match; the hosts have scored only 2 goals in their last 5 matches and have 57% of home games without a goal. Mes Kerman shows better form — in the last 5 matches they have 1 win and 3 draws and average 1.2 points per game, while Shahrdari have not won in those 5 matches and average 0.6 points. Shahrdari, however, generate significantly more (9.5 shots and 4.25 on target per home game, xG 1.36) but have a low shot conversion of 8%, whereas Mes average 4.14 shots with 1.43 on target away and have a higher conversion of 14% and 60% of away matches with a clean sheet. Considering the low average total goals (1.29 per home match and 1.13 for the visitors), Mes’s superior defense (0.47 goals conceded on average away) and the hosts’ lack of finishing, the most likely outcome is a goalless or narrow draw 0:0/1:1.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Seasonal BTTS metrics are low: home teams have BTTS in 33% of matches, away teams 20%, with a league average of 30%, suggesting only about one-third of games finish Goal/Goal. Clean sheets are also common — hosts keep a clean sheet in 53% of matches, visitors in 60% (league: 94%), strongly favoring the scenario that at least one side fails to score. Season-long home xG is 1.43 vs. away 0.64 and homes average 4.8 shots on target per match vs. 1.43 for opponents, however in the last 5 matches the visitors have xG 1.44 vs. hosts 0.89 and in those 5 games they scored 5 and conceded 4, while hosts scored 2 and conceded 5. Overall the league’s low goals average 1.52 and low over 2.5 rates (20% for homes and 7% for aways) point to fewer total goals, therefore the No Goal / BTTS - No is the strongest signal.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Seasonal indicators strongly favor a low-goal outcome: Shahrdari have Over 2.5 in 20% of matches, Mes in 7% — averaging ≈14% for Over 2.5 (i.e. ≈86% for Under 2.5). Both teams keep clean sheets frequently (Shahrdari 53%, Mes 60%), and the league averages just 1.52 goals per game, confirming the defensive nature of the competition. xG and form analysis (xG_for: home 1.43, away 0.64; xG_against: home 0.89, away 1.09; in the last 5 matches away xG_for 1.44 vs home 0.89) averaged produces expected ≈0.81 goals for the home side and ≈0.77 for the away side, total ≈1.58. Season shares of Under 1.5 are 67% for both teams, so Under 1.5 is possible, but the strongest signal remains Under 2.5 (historical Under 2.5: 80%/93% home/away), while Over 3.5 is virtually excluded (0% historical Over 3.5).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
I predict a draw at half-time because the home team were level at the break in 67% of their matches and the away team in 73%, giving an average of about a 70% chance of a draw at half-time. Additionally, both teams have very low first-half goal averages: home 0.27 and away 0.20, and the percentage of matches with no goals at half-time is 80% for both teams, which strongly favors no team leading at the break. A draw at full-time is also a natural scenario — the homes draw in 47% of full-time results and the away team in 40% — while full-time clean sheets are 53% (home) and 60% (away), indicating a low goal environment and frequent draws. Although the away side perform better in second halves (on average 1.47 points gained and winning 33% of second halves versus the home team’s 1.2 and 20%), the home team’s higher xG (1.43 vs 0.64) is offset by a very low shot conversion rate for the homes (6% vs 14%), so the chances created may not translate into a goal advantage. Therefore the most likely scenario I select is a draw at half-time and a draw at full-time (X/X), to which I assign the strongest signal in the forecast.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shahrdari Noshahr | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 31% | 38% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.30 | 0.28 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.50 | 0.42 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Mes Kerman is 100% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - Shahrdari Noshahr · 1.2 pts / game - Mes Kerman
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mes Kerman is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
0.53 goals / game - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.63 goals / game - Mes Kerman
Mes Kerman is 57% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.83 goals / game - Shahrdari Noshahr · 0.53 goals / game - Mes Kerman
Shahrdari Noshahr scores in 43% of games (13 of 30 meczów), while Mes Kerman keeps a clean sheet in 57% (17 of 30 meczów).
Mes Kerman scores in 53% of games (16 of 30 meczów), while Shahrdari Noshahr keeps a clean sheet in 33% (10 of 30 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shahrdari Noshahr
Over / Under - Mes Kerman
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Mes Kerman is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - Shahrdari Noshahr · 1.2 pts / game - Mes Kerman
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shahrdari Noshahr - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 3% of games and wins 17%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Mes Kerman - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 0.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 0% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 100% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 80% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shahrdari Noshahr
Mes Kerman
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Azadegan League).
Teams vs league
| Shahrdari Noshahr | Liga | Mes Kerman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.37 | 1.52 | ▼ 1.17 |
| Both teams scored | • 30% | 30% | ▼ 27% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 7% | 20% | ▼ 13% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 47% | ▲ 57% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 37% | 45% | ▼ 37% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 60% | 55% | ▲ 57% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Shahrdari Noshahr's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mes Kerman. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?
The Azadegan League match finished Shahrdari Noshahr 1:1 Mes Kerman. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?
Shahrdari Noshahr score 0.53 goals per game on average and Mes Kerman 0.63. The Azadegan League average is 1.52 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 20% of games. Both teams score in 30% of Shahrdari Noshahr's matches and 27% of Mes Kerman's.
What form are Shahrdari Noshahr and Mes Kerman in?
Over the last 5 games Shahrdari Noshahr have a 0-3-2 record (0.60 points per game) and Mes Kerman 1-3-1 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shahrdari Noshahr vs Mes Kerman?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


