Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon: match statistics
Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Shanghai SIPG played against Qingdao Jonoon in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: Shanghai Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Shanghai SIPG has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Qingdao Jonoon has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses, with 0.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Shanghai SIPG scores 1.61 goals per game and allows 1.39. Qingdao Jonoon scores 1.35 and allows 1.91. Games in this league average 3.12 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 74% of Shanghai SIPG's games and 65% of Qingdao Jonoon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 61% and 57%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Shanghai SIPG has the higher season xG average, 1.42 to 1.38 per game. Shanghai SIPG takes 11.6 shots per game, while Qingdao Jonoon takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Shanghai SIPG leads at halftime in 26% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Qingdao Jonoon leads at halftime in 26% and scores 0.83 after halftime.
When the teams score
Shanghai SIPG's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (11 goals). For Qingdao Jonoon, it is minutes 76-90+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 3.12 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Shanghai SIPG come into this match with 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat in their last 5 games, while Qingdao Jonoon have lost all 5 of their previous matches, scoring just 2 goals in the process. At home, the hosts average 1.8 goals per game with an xG of 1.74, while the visitors concede as many as 2.5 goals per away match and have kept no clean sheets. The difference in quality is also clearly reflected in the possession figures: Shanghai SIPG control the ball for an average of 63% of the time, compared with just 47% for Qingdao Jonoon. The hosts’ defense allows an average xG of 1.15, whereas the visitors’ attack generates an xG of 1.37 away from home and fails to score in 25% of such matches. With Qingdao Jonoon losing 83% of their away fixtures and Shanghai SIPG winning 40% of their home games, a home victory is the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument in favor of BTTS - No is Qingdao Jonoon’s current attacking form: they have scored just 2 goals in their last five matches, averaging 0.4 per game, and have lost all 5 fixtures. Shanghai SIPG concede an average of 1.27 goals per season but have kept a clean sheet in 18% of matches, so their opponents’ poor run realistically increases the chance that the visitors will fail to score again. The hosts should score, however, as they average 1.55 goals per season and 1.8 across their last five appearances, while Qingdao concede as many as 2.5 goals per match and have not kept a single clean sheet. Seasonal BTTS figures stand at 55% for Shanghai and 75% for Qingdao, but the visitors’ current 40% rate and poor finishing, despite an xG of 1.63 in their last five matches, slightly favor a scenario in which only one side scores.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Shanghai SIPG score an average of 1.55 goals per match, while Qingdao Jonoon concede as many as 2.50, with the visitors yet to keep a single clean sheet this season. The hosts are also in good attacking form: they have scored 9 goals in their last five matches, averaging 1.8 per game, with an average xG of 1.62. The 1.5-goal line has been surpassed in 64% of Shanghai’s matches and in as many as 92% of Qingdao’s fixtures, which is a clearly stronger signal than for higher lines. Qingdao have scored just 0.4 goals per match recently, but they have created chances worth 1.63 xG, while Shanghai concede an average of 1.27 goals, so the visitors’ contribution to the total remains realistic. The safest option is Over 1.5 goals, as the combination of the visitors’ weak defense and the hosts’ attacking potential strongly supports at least two goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Shanghai SIPG have a clear first-half advantage: they have led at the break in 45% of their matches, scoring an average of 0.91 goals before half-time and conceding just 0.27. Qingdao Jonoon score only 0.17 goals before the break, concede 1.17, and have gone into half-time trailing in as many as 67% of their matches. The difference is reinforced by their current form: the hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 1.8 goals, while the visitors have lost all 5, scoring just 0.4 goals per game. Across the season, Qingdao have lost 83% of their matches and concede an average of 2.5 goals, making the Shanghai SIPG lead at half-time and victory at full-time the strongest scenario. The possibility of a post-half-time change in the result is slightly increased by the fact that the hosts concede an average of 1.27 goals per match, but the visitors' poor attacking efficiency limits the likelihood of a full turnaround.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Shanghai SIPG | Qingdao Jonoon | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 30% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.35 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Shanghai SIPG is 19% better for: goals scored per game.
1.61 goals / game - Shanghai SIPG · 1.35 goals / game - Qingdao Jonoon
Shanghai SIPG is 37% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Shanghai SIPG · 1.91 goals / game - Qingdao Jonoon
Shanghai SIPG scores in 87% of games (20 of 23 meczów), while Qingdao Jonoon keeps a clean sheet in 9% (2 of 23 meczów).
Qingdao Jonoon scores in 70% of games (16 of 23 meczów), while Shanghai SIPG keeps a clean sheet in 13% (3 of 23 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Shanghai SIPG
Over / Under - Qingdao Jonoon
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Shanghai SIPG is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.26 pts / game - Shanghai SIPG · 1.13 pts / game - Qingdao Jonoon
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Shanghai SIPG - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Qingdao Jonoon - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 26% of games and wins 26%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 0% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (11 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (7). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Shanghai SIPG
Qingdao Jonoon
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Shanghai SIPG | Liga | Qingdao Jonoon | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.12 | ▲ 3.26 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 74% | 64% | • 65% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 61% | 58% | • 57% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 13% | 20% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | • 70% | 71% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | • 87% | 87% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Other recorded players
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Shanghai SIPG's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Qingdao Jonoon. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon?
The Chinese Super League match finished Shanghai SIPG 2:1 Qingdao Jonoon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Jonoon?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Shanghai SIPG won 2, Qingdao Jonoon won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon?
Shanghai SIPG score 1.61 goals per game on average and Qingdao Jonoon 1.35. The Chinese Super League average is 3.12 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 74% of Shanghai SIPG's matches and 65% of Qingdao Jonoon's.
What form are Shanghai SIPG and Qingdao Jonoon in?
Over the last 5 games Shanghai SIPG have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Qingdao Jonoon 0-0-5 (0.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon?
The statistical background for Shanghai SIPG vs Qingdao Jonoon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


