Japan - J1 LeagueData current as of October 17, 2026

Shimizu S-Pulse vs Machida Zelvia: match statistics

Reasoning:

Full analysis and pick in the app

Check the betting analysis, pick, value bet and full reasoning for this match.

Check analysis and pick

Shimizu S-Pulse vs Machida Zelvia: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Shimizu S-Pulse plays Machida Zelvia in J1 League (Japan). The game is scheduled for October 21, 2026.

Recent form

Shimizu S-Pulse has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Machida Zelvia has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Shimizu S-Pulse scores 0.89 goals per game and allows 1.00. Machida Zelvia scores 2.44 and allows 1.11. Games in this league average 2.91 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 44% of Shimizu S-Pulse's games and 78% of Machida Zelvia's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 67%, compared with league averages of 59% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Machida Zelvia has the higher season xG average, 1.50 to 1.24 per game. Shimizu S-Pulse takes 10.7 shots per game, while Machida Zelvia takes 13.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Shimizu S-Pulse leads at halftime in 11% of its games and scores 0.78 goals per game after halftime. Machida Zelvia leads at halftime in 44% and scores 1.56 after halftime.

When the teams score

Shimizu S-Pulse's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For Machida Zelvia, it is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

J1 League games average 2.91 goals. Both teams score in 59% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Before kickoff

1X2 odds

(-)
(-)
(-)

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0.89Goals scored / game2.44
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
1Goals allowed / game1.11
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
42%Average possession49%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
3.44Shots on target / game4.89
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.67Shots per game13.11
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
3.44Shots on target4.89
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
8.3%Shot conversion18.6%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
42%Possession49%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
1.24xG for1.5
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
1.54xG against1.44
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

Shooting quality

Shimizu S-Pulse: BalancedMachida Zelvia: Efficient finishing
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
Accuracy (shots on target)32%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.50

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Shimizu S-Pulse
DLWWW
Season result split
44% W11% D44% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-1-4
1.44 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-2
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LLDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.2xG: 1.23Opponent xG: 1.43BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Machida Zelvia
WWDLW
Season result split
67% W22% D11% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-1
2.22 pts / game · goal difference +12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
4-1-0
Last 5 away
4-1-0
WWDWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.27Opponent xG: 1.51BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Machida Zelvia is 174% better for: goals scored per game.

0.89 goals / game - Shimizu S-Pulse · 2.44 goals / game - Machida Zelvia

Shimizu S-Pulse is 11% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Shimizu S-Pulse · 1.11 goals / game - Machida Zelvia

Shimizu S-Pulse scoring profile: very strong

Shimizu S-Pulse scores in 67% of games (6 of 9 games), while Machida Zelvia keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 games).

Machida Zelvia scoring profile: very strong

Machida Zelvia scores in 100% of games (9 of 9 games), while Shimizu S-Pulse keeps a clean sheet in 22% (2 of 9 games).

8Goals scored (season)22
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
9Goals conceded (season)10
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
1.89Average goals per game3.56
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
7Goals scored (last 5)9
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
6Goals conceded (last 5)7
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal100%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
22%2 goals67%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%3 goals44%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%4 goals22%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

How often they concede at least...

78%1 goal78%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
11%2 goals11%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
11%3 goals11%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%4 goals11%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

59%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time33%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%Scored in both halves56%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS56%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS11%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
80%BTTS - last 580%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

33%Min. 1 goal before half-time78%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time44%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time11%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

2nd half

89%Min. 1 goal after half-time89%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
44%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
22%Min. 3 goals after half-time44%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Machida Zelvia is 78% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Shimizu S-Pulse · 1.78 pts / game - Machida Zelvia

Shimizu S-Pulse - half-time state
11% leading67% draw22% trailing
Machida Zelvia - half-time state
44% leading44% draw11% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.78
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0.11Goals scored (1st half)0.89
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0.22Goals conceded (1st half)0.44
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0.33Average goals (1st half)1.33
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
78%Clean sheet before half-time56%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
89%No goal before half-time33%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

After half-time (2nd half)

1.22Points per game (2nd half)2.44
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0.78Goals scored (2nd half)1.56
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
0.78Goals conceded (2nd half)0.67
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
1.56Average goals (2nd half)2.22
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
33%Clean sheet after half-time67%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia
44%No goal after half-time11%
Shimizu S-PulseMachida Zelvia

Shimizu S-Pulse - second-half results

33% W22% D44% L
9
Half-time points
1
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
11
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding400%

Leads at halftime in 11% of games and wins 44%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Machida Zelvia - second-half results

78% W11% D11% L
16
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.78
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Shimizu S-Pulse - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.602.00
Goals scored / game0.01.4
Goals allowed / game0.40.8
Average goals per game0.42.2
1 goal40%100%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal100%0%
Goal difference-2+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Machida Zelvia - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.602.40
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.21.2
Average goals per game0.62.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals0%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet80%40%
No goal60%0%
Goal difference+1+1
Half-time: 40% leading - 40% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 80% won - 0% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Shimizu S-Pulse
ScoredConceded
0
1
0-15
0
1
16-30
1
0
31-45
2
2
46-60
4
2
61-75
1
3
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Machida Zelvia
ScoredConceded
1
2
0-15
2
1
16-30
5
1
31-45
3
4
46-60
4
1
61-75
7
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.72
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.0 : 1.7
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+28%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
67%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Shimizu S-Pulse

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.30
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.19
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.35
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
57%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

Machida Zelvia

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.06
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+1.27
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.94
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.33
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
182%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 5% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (J1 League).

Teams vs league

Shimizu S-PulseLigaMachida Zelvia
Average goals per game▼ 1.892.91▲ 3.56
Both teams scored▼ 44%59%▲ 78%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%53%▲ 67%
Clean sheets• 22%23%• 22%
Goal before half-time▼ 33%68%▲ 78%
Goal after half-time• 89%88%• 89%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.91
Average goals per game
59%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.57
Home goals / game
1.34
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
88%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Record from Shimizu S-Pulse's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss against Machida Zelvia. Games average 3.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FC Machida Zelvia
3 : 0
Shimizu S-Pulse
Shimizu S-Pulse
2 : 2
FC Machida Zelvia

FAQ

When do Shimizu S-Pulse and Machida Zelvia play?

Shimizu S-Pulse face Machida Zelvia on October 21, 2026 in J1 League. The exact kick-off time in your timezone is shown at the top of the match page.

What is the head-to-head record between Shimizu S-Pulse and Machida Zelvia?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Shimizu S-Pulse won 0, Machida Zelvia won 1 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 3.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Shimizu S-Pulse vs Machida Zelvia?

Shimizu S-Pulse score 0.89 goals per game on average and Machida Zelvia 2.44. The J1 League average is 2.91 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 44% of Shimizu S-Pulse's matches and 78% of Machida Zelvia's.

What form are Shimizu S-Pulse and Machida Zelvia in?

Over the last 5 games Shimizu S-Pulse have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Machida Zelvia 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Shimizu S-Pulse vs Machida Zelvia?

The statistical background for Shimizu S-Pulse vs Machida Zelvia — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.