Simba vs Coastal Union: match statistics
Simba vs Coastal Union: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Simba play Coastal Union in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The match date is 2 April 2026 at 18:00. Final score: 2:0.
Current form
Simba: 5-0-0, 3.00 points/match. Coastal Union: 2-2-1, 1.60 points/match.
Goal statistics
Simba scores 1.79 and concedes 0.38 goals per match. Coastal Union scores 1.03 and concedes 1.23. League average: 2.17 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Simba 28%, Coastal Union 50%. Over 2.5: Simba 48%, Coastal Union 37%. League level: BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
xG, shots and style
Simba has higher xG: 1.57 vs 1.19. Simba: 8.7 shots per match, Coastal Union: 5.8.
Match halves
Simba: half-time lead 59%, second-half goals 0.79. Coastal Union: half-time lead 33%, second-half goals 0.37.
Goals by minute
Simba: 31-45+ (13 goals). Coastal Union: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Ligi kuu Bara: 2.17 goals per match, BTTS 35%, Over 2.5 39%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 1-0-0. Average goals 3.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
Simba is the favorite: at home they score on average 2.14 goals and concede only 0.43, have a 71% home win rate and 71% clean sheets at home with a +12 goal differential. Coastal Union away average is 0.56 goals scored and 1.33 conceded, they fail to score in 78% of away matches with a conversion rate of just 8%. In the last 5 matches both teams scored 6 goals each, but Simba conceded only 2 and averages 1.8 points per game versus Coastal’s 7 goals conceded and 1.0 points per game. Simba also creates more high-quality chances: home xG 1.74 vs away xG 1.06, they attempt more shots (9.83 vs 7) and more on target (4.33 vs 2.22) while holding 58% possession vs 44%. Considering Simba’s superior defense (0.43 goals conceded per home game), higher efficiency (20% conversion vs 8%) and Coastal’s high percentage of matches without scoring (78%), I predict a home win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Simba | Coastal Union | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.18 | 0.21 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.52 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Simba is 88% better for: last-5 form.
3 pts / match - Simba · 1.6 pts / match - Coastal Union
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Simba is 74% better for: goals scored per match.
1.79 goals / match - Simba · 1.03 goals / match - Coastal Union
Simba is 224% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.38 goals / match - Simba · 1.23 goals / match - Coastal Union
Simba scores in 83% of matches (24 of 29 matches), while Coastal Union keeps a clean sheet in 20% (6 of 30 matches).
Coastal Union scores in 63% of matches (19 of 30 matches), while Simba keeps a clean sheet in 69% (20 of 29 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Simba
Over / Under — Coastal Union
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Simba is 58% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2.17 pts / match - Simba · 1.37 pts / match - Coastal Union
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Simba - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 59% of matches and wins 72%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
Coastal Union - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 33% of matches and wins 30%. Usually protects the lead until full-time.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +5 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 2.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (13 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Simba
Coastal Union
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Simba | Liga | Coastal Union | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.17 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 28% | 35% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 48% | 39% | ▼ 37% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 69% | 39% | ▼ 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 69% | 60% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 69% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Simba 1 - 0 - 0 Coastal Union. Average goals 3.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Simba vs Coastal Union?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Simba 2:0 Coastal Union. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Simba vs Coastal Union?
Simba score 1.79 goals per game on average and Coastal Union 1.03. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 28% of Simba's matches and 50% of Coastal Union's.
What form are Simba and Coastal Union in?
Over the last 5 games Simba have a 5-0-0 record (3.00 points per game) and Coastal Union 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Simba vs Coastal Union?
The statistical background for Simba vs Coastal Union — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.