SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers: match statistics
SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SJ Earthquakes played against Portland Timbers in MLS (United States). The game was played on September 27, 2026. Venue: PayPal Park. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
SJ Earthquakes has 2 wins, 3 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Portland Timbers has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
SJ Earthquakes scores 1.77 goals per game and allows 1.46. Portland Timbers scores 1.81 and allows 1.85. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of SJ Earthquakes's games and 77% of Portland Timbers's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 73%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 62% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
SJ Earthquakes has the higher season xG average, 1.54 to 1.53 per game. SJ Earthquakes takes 13.7 shots per game, while Portland Timbers takes 13.5.
First-half and second-half trends
SJ Earthquakes leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.88 goals per game after halftime. Portland Timbers leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.96 after halftime.
When the teams score
SJ Earthquakes's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (11 goals). For Portland Timbers, it is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
MLS games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 62% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
SJ Earthquakes are unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 2 wins and 3 draws, while Portland Timbers have lost 3 of their last 5 games and collected just 4 points in that span. At home, the hosts create significantly more chances, averaging 16.62 shots and 6.38 shots on target per match, compared with 13.25 and 4.08 respectively for the visitors away from home. The quality of chances also favors San Jose, whose home xG stands at 1.84, while Portland concede as much as 2.12 xG away from home and allow an average of 1.92 goals. Timbers have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match, and in addition, they have failed to score in 33% of such fixtures. Earthquakes also concede 1.62 goals per game at home, so a goal for the visitors is possible; however, the hosts’ superior current form and attacking potential point to a home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for both teams to score is very strong: BTTS occurred in 86% of SJ Earthquakes matches and 67% of Portland Timbers matches, compared with a league average of 63%. The hosts score an average of 2.21 goals per match, while Portland concede 1.92, with the visitors recording a 0% clean-sheet rate. Portland score an average of 1.33 goals, while the SJ Earthquakes defense has kept a clean sheet in only 7% of matches and concedes 1.79 goals per game. In their last five appearances, the Timbers recorded BTTS in 80% of matches and scored an average of 1.8 goals, while their opponents conceded as many as 2.2 goals per game. The xG figures also support a Goal/Goal scenario, standing at 1.62 for the hosts and 1.44 for the visitors.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
SJ Earthquakes score an average of 2.21 goals at home, while Portland Timbers concede as many as 1.92 goals per away game, clearly supporting the hosts’ attacking output. The xG profile also points to an open game: 1.62 xG for SJ Earthquakes and 1.44 xG for Portland, with the visitors conceding an average of 2.12 xG. In their last five matches, Portland have scored 9 goals but also conceded 11, while 80% of their games during this period went Over 2.5 goals. At least two goals were scored in 93% of SJ Earthquakes’ matches and in every Portland fixture, making Over 1.5 goals the strongest pick. An additional argument is that both teams rarely keep clean sheets: the hosts in 7% of their matches, and the visitors in none.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
SJ Earthquakes have been clearly stronger throughout the season, averaging 2.21 goals per match and winning 50% of their games, while Portland are averaging just 0.67 points per match and have lost 67% of their fixtures. The hosts also hold a clear edge in chance quality, with an xG of 1.62, while Portland allow opponents an xG as high as 2.12. In their last five matches, Earthquakes led at the break in 60% of cases and conceded just 0.4 goals before half-time, whereas the Timbers were behind after 45 minutes in 60% of matches, conceding an average of 1.2 goals. After the interval, the hosts score an average of 1.14 goals while conceding just 0.64, reinforcing the scenario of them maintaining or extending their lead. Portland remain dangerous, scoring an average of 1.33 goals per match, but their 1.92 goals conceded and lack of clean sheets support an HT/FT prediction of SJ Earthquakes leading at half-time and securing the full-time win (1/1).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SJ Earthquakes | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.35 | 0.41 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
SJ Earthquakes is 125% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes · 0.8 pts / game - Portland Timbers
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
SJ Earthquakes is 27% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.46 goals / game - SJ Earthquakes · 1.85 goals / game - Portland Timbers
SJ Earthquakes scores in 85% of games (22 of 26 games), while Portland Timbers keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 26 games).
Portland Timbers scores in 81% of games (21 of 26 games), while SJ Earthquakes keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJ Earthquakes
Over / Under - Portland Timbers
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
SJ Earthquakes is 44% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.5 pts / game - SJ Earthquakes · 1.04 pts / game - Portland Timbers
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJ Earthquakes - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 46%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Portland Timbers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.80 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (11 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SJ Earthquakes
Portland Timbers
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (MLS).
Teams vs league
| SJ Earthquakes | Liga | Portland Timbers | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 3.23 | 3.21 | ▲ 3.65 |
| Both teams scored | • 62% | 63% | ▲ 77% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 58% | 62% | ▲ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 27% | 21% | ▼ 4% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 73% | 81% | • 81% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from SJ Earthquakes's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Portland Timbers. Games average 4.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?
The MLS match finished SJ Earthquakes 3:1 Portland Timbers. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?
SJ Earthquakes score 1.77 goals per game on average and Portland Timbers 1.81. The MLS average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 62% of games. Both teams score in 62% of SJ Earthquakes's matches and 77% of Portland Timbers's.
What form are SJ Earthquakes and Portland Timbers in?
Over the last 5 games SJ Earthquakes have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Portland Timbers 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers?
The statistical background for SJ Earthquakes vs Portland Timbers — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


