SJK Akatemia vs Haka: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SJK Akatemia played against Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on May 22, 2026. Final score: 0:1.
Recent form
SJK Akatemia has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Haka has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.
Scoring records
SJK Akatemia scores 0.57 goals per game and allows 1.43. Haka scores 2.00 and allows 1.17. Games in this league average 2.35 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of SJK Akatemia's games and 50% of Haka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 50%, compared with league averages of 41% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haka has the higher season xG average, 1.65 to 1.12 per game. SJK Akatemia takes 8.6 shots per game, while Haka takes 12.8.
First-half and second-half trends
SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. Haka leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.50 after halftime.
When the teams score
SJK Akatemia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Haka, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.35 goals. Both teams score in 41% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I predict an away win (2): Haka holds a clear advantage in the table and goal output — 5th vs 9th for SJK and 12 goals this season vs 4 for SJK. In the last 5 matches Haka scored 16 and conceded 5, while SJK scored 5 and conceded 7, illustrating Haka’s superiority in attack and defensive stability. xG metrics are similar in attack (Haka xG 1.32 vs SJK xG 1.23), but SJK allowed 1.94 xG on average at home, whereas Haka concedes just 0.91 xG away, giving the visitors better quality of chances. Additionally, Haka averages 2.0 points per game in the last five fixtures vs SJK’s 1.4, and the visitors concede 0.5 goals on average away compared to the home side’s 1.0 at their stadium, which further favors the away team. SJK score only 0.33 goals per home match with 67% of home games without a goal, so I rate Haka higher than a draw or home win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I back BTTS - Yes because Haka has averaged 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 goals in 5 games), while SJK has conceded an average of 1.4 goals per match in that period (7 conceded in 5), which is a strong indicator that Haka will score. xG metrics support this: Haka’s recent xG is 1.95 versus xG against SJK of 1.4, and SJK has xG 1.55 with xG against Haka 1.01, suggesting both teams are generating around 1–2 expected goals. Despite seasonal anomalies (SJK has seasonal BTTS 75% and Haka 0%), both teams have 40% BTTS in the last 5 matches, so I give greater weight to the more recent data. Additionally, SJK at home averages 14.5 shots and 6.75 on target per game, and Haka has taken 16 shots in the last 5 matches, so goals from both sides are realistic. On this basis I assign a 70% probability to BTTS - Yes and 30% to No Goal, because xG and form over the last 5 matches clearly point to mutual scoring despite seasonal contradictions.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG: the home side has xG_for 1.81 and xG_against 0.91, yielding expected home goals ≈1.36; the visitors have xG_for 1.32 and xG_against 1.12, giving expected away goals ≈1.22, total ≈2.58 goals. A Poisson model with λ=2.58 produces ~73% for Over 1.5, ~48% for Over 2.5 and ~26% for Over 3.5. Additionally, SJK at home has 100% of matches with over 1.5 goals and 75% with over 2.5; the hosts average 6.75 shots on target with a 21% conversion (visitors 3.0 shots on target and 0% conversion), and Haka has averaged 3.2 goals in the last 5 matches (16 goals in 5), which increases scoring probability. Considering the Poisson output (~73% for Over 1.5) and SJK’s very strong home metrics, the strongest signal is Over 1.5; Over 2.5 is moderately likely (~56% after accounting for seasonal data), and Over 3.5 remains less certain (~35%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1, because SJK Akatemia score an average of 3.0 goals per home match and have an xG of 1.81 versus Haka’s xG of 1.32, with an average of 6.75 shots on target for the hosts compared to 3.0 for the visitors. The hosts led at the break in 50% of matches and average 0.75 goals by half-time, whereas Haka’s seasonal average for goals by half-time is 0.0 and their season average for goals scored as visitors is 0.0, which weakens their first-half prospects. Additionally, SJK show high second-half activity: an average of 3.25 goals in the second half of their matches and as many as 5 goals scored in minutes 76–90, increasing the likelihood they will maintain or extend their lead. In the last 5 matches Haka led at the break in 3 of 5 games (60%), but their season away form remains poor—an average of 0.0 goals scored on the road and only 0.5 points per away match—so the chance of a turnaround is limited. On this basis I assign 38% to 1/1 as the primary pick and 20% to X/1 as a realistic alternative (the hosts often decide the game in the second half); the remaining scenarios are significantly less likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | Haka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 43% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.21 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Haka is 700% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.6 pts / game - Haka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 251% better for: goals scored per game.
0.57 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 2 goals / game - Haka
Haka is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.43 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.17 goals / game - Haka
SJK Akatemia scores in 43% of games (3 of 7 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
Haka scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 meczów), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 14% (1 of 7 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
Over / Under - Haka
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haka is 55% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.33 pts / game - Haka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Haka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 100% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +5 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SJK Akatemia
Haka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | Haka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 2.35 | ▲ 3.17 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 35% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | • 57% | 56% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 71% | 65% | ▲ 67% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs Haka?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 0:1 Haka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs Haka?
SJK Akatemia score 0.57 goals per game on average and Haka 2.00. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.35 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 29% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 50% of Haka's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and Haka in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Haka 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs Haka?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for SJK Akatemia vs Haka: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


