SJK Akatemia vs Haka: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs Haka: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SJK Akatemia played against Haka in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on June 15, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
SJK Akatemia has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. Haka has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
SJK Akatemia scores 0.40 goals per game and allows 1.20. Haka scores 1.80 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.30 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 20% of SJK Akatemia's games and 50% of Haka's. The Over 2.5 rates are 20% and 50%, compared with league averages of 39% for BTTS and 41% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Haka has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.09 per game. SJK Akatemia takes 8.6 shots per game, while Haka takes 11.3.
First-half and second-half trends
SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 10% of its games and scores 0.30 goals per game after halftime. Haka leads at halftime in 30% and scores 1.30 after halftime.
When the teams score
SJK Akatemia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For Haka, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.30 goals. Both teams score in 39% of games, and 41% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
The favorite is Haka — they sit 4th with a record of 5 wins, 3 draws and 2 losses and 18 goals for and 10 against; SJK Akatemia are 9th with 1 win, 3 draws and 6 losses and only 4 goals scored. The form gap is significant: Haka average 1.8 points per game over the last 5 matches (3 wins), while SJK have just 0.2 points per game and 0 wins in that period, conceding 10 goals in those five matches. In attack the hosts at home score only 0.2 goals on average with an xG of 1.11 and a conversion rate of just 2%, indicating severe inefficiency (they failed to score in 80% of home matches), whereas Haka away average 0.75 goals with an xG of 1.16 and a conversion of about 9%. Defensively the visitors have a clear edge — Haka concede only 0.25 goals away and have 75% clean sheets, while SJK at home concede 0.8 goals per game and have a negative goal balance. Additionally Haka control matches (57% possession and an average of 3.25 shots on target away) versus the hosts’ 48% possession and 2.8 SOT, so I predict an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I assign a 70% probability to No BTTS and 30% to BTTS (Goal/Goal), because Haka's key defensive signals prevail. Haka has a seasonal clean sheet rate of 75% and concedes on average 0.25 goals per match, which strongly indicates continued shutout performances. SJK scores on average 2.5 goals per match seasonally with xG 1.7 and a seasonal BTTS of 83%, but in the last 5 matches SJK have failed to score (gf_last5_home 0.0) and conceded an average of 2.0 goals in those games. Haka have scored 6 goals in their last 5 matches with form W L W L W and despite a lower seasonal xG (1.16), their current defensive stability and 75% clean sheet rate outweigh SJK’s historical offensive potential. Therefore the pick is No (No Goal / clean sheet expected) as the strongest signal (70% vs 30%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG and shot conversion I estimate total expected goals around 2.94: home ~1.99 (xG 1.70 and conversion 13.5×19% = 2.57, averaged) and away ~0.95 (xG 1.16 and conversion 8×9% = 0.72, averaged). SJK Akatemia scores 2.5 goals at home on average and has 100% of home matches over 1.5 goals and 83% over 2.5 this season, while Haka averages 0.75 goals away with only 25% of away matches >1.5 and 0% >2.5. Additionally SJK averages 13.5 shots (5.67 on target) with a 19% conversion, and Haka 8 shots (3.25 on target) with a 9% conversion, which supports a higher goal output from the home side. Considering this I assess probability of OVER 1.5 at 96%, OVER 2.5 at 68% and OVER 3.5 at 42% — projected 2.94 goals and 100% of SJK home matches >1.5 give a very strong signal to play the over 1.5, although Haka has 75% clean sheets away which slightly reduces chances for very high overs. Best line to play is Over 1.5 (side: over), because historically SJK at home shows a consistent tendency for matches above 1.5 and the model confirms a clear edge for this option.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and an away victory (X/2). In the last 5 matches SJK Akatemia have 0% wins and average 0.0 goals scored, while Haka have 60% wins and average 1.2 goals per match, giving the visitors a clear form advantage. I expect a draw at the break: hosts average 0.67 goals by half-time versus Haka’s 0.25, and in their last 5 fixtures SJK have not held a lead at the break (0% leads). Haka perform significantly better after half-time — their second-half rate in the last 5 matches is 2.0 with 60% wins in those periods, while SJK have 0.4 and 0% second-half wins, which increases the visitors’ chance of a turnaround. Additionally, SJK create more chances (xG 1.7 vs 1.16 and 13.5 shots with 5.67 on target versus 8.0 and 3.25), but Haka’s high clean sheet percentage (75%) and SJK’s poor form (0.0 goals in 5) support that a draw HT and a Haka win FT is the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | Haka | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 42% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.18 | 0.38 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Haka is 900% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 2 pts / game - Haka
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Haka is 350% better for: goals scored per game.
0.4 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.8 goals / game - Haka
Haka is 20% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.2 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 1 goals / game - Haka
SJK Akatemia scores in 30% of games (3 of 10 meczów), while Haka keeps a clean sheet in 40% (4 of 10 meczów).
Haka scores in 80% of games (8 of 10 meczów), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 20% (2 of 10 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
Over / Under - Haka
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Haka is 50% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.8 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.2 pts / game - Haka
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 10% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Haka - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 30% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 40% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 2.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SJK Akatemia
Haka
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | Haka | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.60 | 2.30 | ▲ 2.80 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 20% | 39% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 20% | 41% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 20% | 35% | ▲ 40% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 70% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 60% | 67% | ▲ 70% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from SJK Akatemia's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Haka. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs Haka?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 0:2 Haka. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs Haka?
SJK Akatemia score 0.40 goals per game on average and Haka 1.80. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.30 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 41% of games. Both teams score in 20% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 50% of Haka's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and Haka in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and Haka 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs Haka?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for SJK Akatemia vs Haka: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


