SJK Akatemia vs JäPS: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs JäPS: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SJK Akatemia played against JäPS in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Final score: 2:3.
Recent form
SJK Akatemia has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. JäPS has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
SJK Akatemia scores 0.52 goals per game and allows 1.57. JäPS scores 0.86 and allows 1.38. Games in this league average 2.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 29% of SJK Akatemia's games and 24% of JäPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 29% and 43%, compared with league averages of 43% for BTTS and 45% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
SJK Akatemia has the higher season xG average, 1.22 to 1.21 per game. SJK Akatemia takes 9.8 shots per game, while JäPS takes 9.9.
First-half and second-half trends
SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 5% of its games and scores 0.43 goals per game after halftime. JäPS leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
SJK Akatemia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For JäPS, it is minutes 31-45+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.50 goals. Both teams score in 43% of games, and 45% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
JäPS sit 5th, while SJK Akatemia are tenth, and over the course of the season the visitors have recorded 9 wins compared with just 2 victories for the hosts. SJK Akatemia have lost 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded as many as 13 goals during that period, significantly harming their chances despite home advantage. At home, the hosts average just 0.4 goals and have failed to score in 70% of such matches, whereas JäPS average 0.8 goals per away game and record 3.1 shots on target compared with their opponents’ 2.6. Both defenses allow opponents to create high-quality chances, but the average xG against SJK Akatemia stands at 1.93, compared with 1.78 against JäPS. The visitors are also on a poor scoring run, with just 2 goals in their last five matches, so JäPS’ advantage is not decisive; nevertheless, their superior season-long potential points towards a victory.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The signal for BTTS - No is clear, as SJK Akatemia had both teams score in only 9% of their matches this season, compared with the league average of 44%. JäPS have also shown limited attacking consistency: they have averaged just 0.4 goals over their last 5 matches, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of those games. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 64% of their matches this season, while the visitors have failed to score in 40% of their fixtures. SJK Akatemia are also currently scoring only 0.8 goals per match, making both a JäPS blank and a narrow away win without a goal from the hosts realistic possibilities. Although the hosts have recently conceded an average of 2.6 goals, the poor efficiency of both attacks and the low historical BTTS figures provide stronger support for a scenario in which at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
SJK Akatemia averages only 0.91 goals per game this season, while JäPS averages 0.80, limiting the fixture’s baseline scoring potential. The hosts have kept a clean sheet in 64% of their matches, while as many as 91% of their games have ended with a maximum of three goals; for JäPS, this figure stands at 70%. SJK’s recent form has been defensively weaker, with the team conceding 13 goals in five appearances, but JäPS has scored just 2 goals over the same period, so they should only partially exploit this weakness. The estimated 2.37 goals remains below the league average of 2.53, while the notably low rates of matches finishing Over 3.5 goals—9% and 30%—support the Under 3.5 goals market.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely HT/FT outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a win for SJK Akatemia, as JäPS were level at the break in 50% of their matches, compared with 36% for the hosts. SJK Akatemia have defended very effectively before half-time, conceding an average of just 0.18 goals, while JäPS have scored only 0.40 goals per match in this period. After the break, the visitors clearly become weaker defensively, conceding an average of 1.30 goals, while across the competition they allow opponents 1.90 goals per game. The hosts also have more favourable xG figures: 1.27 in attack compared with 1.78 xG conceded by JäPS, indicating SJK’s growing advantage as the match progresses. Despite the hosts’ poor current form, SJK’s seasonal win rate stands at 55%, compared with 30% for JäPS, so after a cautious start, a turnaround in favor of the hosts is more likely.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 28% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.19 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
JäPS is 33% better for: last-5 form.
0.6 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 0.8 pts / game - JäPS
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
JäPS is 65% better for: goals scored per game.
0.52 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 0.86 goals / game - JäPS
JäPS is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.57 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.38 goals / game - JäPS
SJK Akatemia scores in 38% of games (8 of 21 games), while JäPS keeps a clean sheet in 48% (10 of 21 games).
JäPS scores in 62% of games (13 of 21 games), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
Over / Under - JäPS
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
JäPS is 113% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.67 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.43 pts / game - JäPS
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 5% of games and wins 10%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
JäPS - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SJK Akatemia
JäPS
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | JäPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.10 | 2.50 | ▼ 2.24 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 29% | 43% | ▼ 24% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 29% | 45% | ▼ 43% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 19% | 32% | ▲ 48% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 52% | 63% | • 62% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 76% | 71% | • 71% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from SJK Akatemia's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses against JäPS. Games average 2.80 goals, and both teams scored in 60% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 2:3 JäPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between SJK Akatemia and JäPS?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches SJK Akatemia won 1, JäPS won 2 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 2.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 60% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
SJK Akatemia score 0.52 goals per game on average and JäPS 0.86. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 45% of games. Both teams score in 29% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 24% of JäPS's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and JäPS in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and JäPS 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs JäPS?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.