SJK Akatemia vs MP: match statistics
SJK Akatemia vs MP: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
SJK Akatemia played against MP in Ykkösliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 11, 2026. Final score: 1:1.
Recent form
SJK Akatemia has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.20 points per game. MP has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
SJK Akatemia scores 0.31 goals per game and allows 1.31. MP scores 0.92 and allows 1.15. Games in this league average 2.44 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 15% of SJK Akatemia's games and 38% of MP's. The Over 2.5 rates are 15% and 38%, compared with league averages of 42% for BTTS and 44% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
MP has the higher season xG average, 1.21 to 1.16 per game. SJK Akatemia takes 9.2 shots per game, while MP takes 9.8.
First-half and second-half trends
SJK Akatemia leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.23 goals per game after halftime. MP leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.46 after halftime.
When the teams score
SJK Akatemia's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (2 goals). For MP, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ykkösliiga games average 2.44 goals. Both teams score in 42% of games, and 44% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back an away win for MP; so far this season MP have scored 12 goals and recorded 5 wins versus SJK Akatemia's 4 goals and only 1 win. In the last 5 matches MP have scored 6 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while SJK have failed to score in those five fixtures and average just 0.2 points per game. In terms of chance quality, average xG is 1.09 for SJK in home matches versus 1.22 for MP away, however the home side convert extremely poorly — only 0.17 goals per game with a conversion rate of around 2% and 2.67 shots on target, while MP average 0.71 goals per game, ~7% conversion and 4 shots on target. Defensively both teams conceded 6 goals in the last 5 matches; on average SJK concede 1.00 goal per home game versus 1.14 conceded by MP away, but the share of clean sheets for the hosts is significant — 83% versus 43% for the visitors. Given clearly better efficiency, more goals (12 vs 4), superior 1.4 points per game in the last 5 fixtures and a lower share of matches without a goal for MP, I assess the probabilities as: away win 60%, draw 25%, home win 15%.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I lean toward the No scenario: SJK Akatemia have scored 0 and conceded 6 in their last 5 matches (avg 0.0 and 1.2), while MP have scored 6 and conceded 6 in their last 5 (avg 1.2 and 1.2), indicating a lack of offensive output from the hosts. Seasonally SJK show BTTS at 50% vs 29% for MP with the league average at 41%, but recent trends favor No Goal. Both teams have similar offensive xG (SJK 1.20 vs MP 1.22) with xG against 1.49 vs 1.46; however SJK produced xG 1.27 over the last 5 matches and still failed to score, indicating low finishing efficiency. MP register more shots on target (4.0 vs 3.17) but have lower conversion (7% vs 12%), so a single MP goal without a response from the hosts is more likely; therefore I assign higher probability to No (65% vs 35%).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The model combines teams' attacking xG and opponents' xG and produces expected goals of 1.33 for SJK Akatemia and 1.36 for MP, totaling 2.69 goals, which is above the league average of 2.38. With combined λ=2.69 the Poisson distribution yields P(0)=6.8% and P(1)=18.2%, so the probability of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5) is about 75%, at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) about 50%, and at least 4 goals (Over 3.5) about 28%. Season statistics confirm a moderate tendency for goals: SJK averages 1.17 scored and 1.17 conceded per match, MP scores 0.71 and concedes 1.14; their xG for are 1.20 and 1.22, and xG against 1.49 and 1.46, which justifies the 1.33/1.36 expectations. Additionally SJK has 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals and 50% with over 1.5, MP respectively 100% and 43%, and in the last 5 matches MP scored 6 goals versus 0 for SJK, which increases the likelihood of away goals and strengthens the signal for at least 2 goals. As a result the strongest pick is Over 1.5 (~75% probability), while Over 2.5 is balanced (~50/50) and Over 3.5 has low probability (~28%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
SJK Akatemia averages 1.17 goals per match versus MP’s 0.71, and scores an average of 0.67 goals in the first half compared to the visitors’ 0.29, which strongly favors the home side to lead at the break. The hosts led at half-time in 4 matches (67%) while MP led in only 1 match (14%); additionally SJK has a higher shot conversion rate (12% vs 7%) despite similar xG (1.20 vs 1.22). For Full-Time I prefer a home win, since SJK’s points per game average is 1.67 versus MP’s 0.86 and the hosts win 50% of matches compared to the visitors’ 29%, although in the last 5 games SJK has 0% wins versus MP’s 40%, which reduces confidence. The second half may bring a turnaround — the visitors have 71% of matches with at least one goal after the break, and both teams concede roughly 0.83–0.86 goals in second halves, so comeback scenarios are realistic. Therefore the most likely scenario is the home side leading at half-time and winning at full-time (1/1), to which I assign 35%.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| SJK Akatemia | MP | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 26% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.13 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
MP is 600% better for: last-5 form.
0.2 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.4 pts / game - MP
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
MP is 197% better for: goals scored per game.
0.31 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 0.92 goals / game - MP
MP is 14% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.31 goals / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.15 goals / game - MP
SJK Akatemia scores in 23% of games (3 of 13 meczów), while MP keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).
MP scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while SJK Akatemia keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - SJK Akatemia
Over / Under - MP
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
MP is 123% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.69 pts / game - SJK Akatemia · 1.54 pts / game - MP
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
SJK Akatemia - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 8%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
MP - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.5 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.40 | 0.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -3 | -3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (2 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
SJK Akatemia
MP
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ykkösliiga).
Teams vs league
| SJK Akatemia | Liga | MP | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 1.62 | 2.44 | ▼ 2.08 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 15% | 42% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 15% | 44% | ▼ 38% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 15% | 33% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 54% | 64% | ▲ 69% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 69% | 73% | ▼ 62% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from SJK Akatemia's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against MP. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of SJK Akatemia vs MP?
The Ykkösliiga match finished SJK Akatemia 1:1 MP. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before SJK Akatemia vs MP?
SJK Akatemia score 0.31 goals per game on average and MP 0.92. The Ykkösliiga average is 2.44 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 44% of games. Both teams score in 15% of SJK Akatemia's matches and 38% of MP's.
What form are SJK Akatemia and MP in?
Over the last 5 games SJK Akatemia have a 0-1-4 record (0.20 points per game) and MP 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK Akatemia vs MP?
The statistical background for SJK Akatemia vs MP — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


