Finland - VeikkausliigaOmaSP StadionData current as of September 03, 2026

SJK vs Lahti: match statistics

SJK crest
SJK
1 : 2half-time 0:0
Lahti crest
Lahti

SJK vs Lahti: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

SJK played against Lahti in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on August 21, 2026. Venue: OmaSP Stadion. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

SJK has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Lahti has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

SJK scores 1.20 goals per game and allows 1.55. Lahti scores 1.15 and allows 0.90. Games in this league average 2.63 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 55% of SJK's games and 40% of Lahti's. The Over 2.5 rates are 55% and 30%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 48% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

SJK has the higher season xG average, 1.58 to 1.42 per game. SJK takes 13.5 shots per game, while Lahti takes 12.6.

First-half and second-half trends

SJK leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Lahti leads at halftime in 35% and scores 0.45 after halftime.

When the teams score

SJK's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Lahti, it is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.63 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 48% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

SJK have the stronger case at home: they average 1.50 goals per match there, create chances worth 1.79 xG and register 5.1 shots on target. Lahti score just 0.67 goals per away game, while failing to find the net in 44% of such matches, which should limit their attacking potential. However, the hosts are not entirely reliable defensively, conceding an average of 1.30 goals at home while allowing opponents 1.40 xG, so a draw remains a realistic outcome. Lahti enter the match with a slightly better run of form over the last five rounds, collecting 7 points compared with SJK’s 4, and conceding only 3 goals during that period. Despite this, the visitors’ away record is poor — 56% losses and only 22% wins — so the home advantage and superior quality of chances created should be attributed to SJK.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, primarily due to Lahti’s limited attacking efficiency: away from home, they average just 0.67 goals and fail to score in 44% of matches. BTTS has occurred in only 33% of Lahti’s matches this season and just 20% of their last five, while SJK’s figures stand at 45% for the season and 40% in their recent run. SJK concede an average of 0.91 goals, and Lahti have conceded just 0.6 goals per match across their last five games, supporting a scenario in which at least one side keeps a clean sheet. The hosts should have chances to score, averaging 1.55 goals, but Lahti’s low 6% conversion rate compared with SJK’s 12.0% increases the risk that the visitors will fail to find the net.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

SJK score an average of 1.55 goals at home and concede just 0.91, while Lahti score only 0.67 goals per away match. Lahti have failed to score in 44% of their matches, while SJK have kept a clean sheet in 45% of their games, clearly limiting the prospects of a high-scoring performance from the visitors. SJK matches have finished with Under 3.5 goals in 82% of cases, while this scenario has occurred in all of Lahti’s matches so far. Under 2.5 goals has also been recorded in 64% and 78% of matches, respectively, although SJK’s last five games have been slightly more open, with 60% finishing Over 2.5 goals. An estimated 2.10 goals, combined with both teams’ effective defensive records, provides the strongest signal for Under 3.5 goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

SJK have the clearer potential over the full 90 minutes: they score an average of 1.55 goals compared with Lahti’s 0.67, while their shot conversion rate stands at 12%, versus just 6% for the visitors. The hosts also have the stronger underlying quality indicators, with an average xG of 1.48, while Lahti allow opponents an xG of 1.44. The first-half picture is less clear, however: SJK have not led at the break in any of their last five matches and were trailing at half-time in as many as 80% of them, making a draw at half-time a safer scenario than a home lead. Lahti have been behind at half-time in 44% of their matches this season and average just 0.33 goals before the break, which limits their chances of holding onto an advantage until full-time. The X/1 pick best combines a cautious start with SJK’s greater quality and Lahti’s poor season-long scoring efficiency, with the visitors losing 56% of their league matches.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 2
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
SJKLahti
16Shots16
SJKLahti
7Shots on target4
SJKLahti
1.85xG1.52
SJKLahti
4Corners5
SJKLahti
48Dangerous attacks32
SJKLahti
20Fouls12
SJKLahti
5Cards5
SJKLahti

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.2Goals scored / game1.15
SJKLahti
1.55Goals allowed / game0.9
SJKLahti
52%Average possession55%
SJKLahti
4.65Shots on target / game3.95
SJKLahti

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.5Shots per game12.6
SJKLahti
4.65Shots on target3.95
SJKLahti
8.9%Shot conversion9.1%
SJKLahti
52%Possession55%
SJKLahti
1.58xG for1.42
SJKLahti
1.47xG against1.25
SJKLahti

Shooting quality

SJK: BalancedLahti: Balanced
SJKLahti
Accuracy (shots on target)34%31%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.260.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Lahti is 75% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - SJK · 1.4 pts / game - Lahti

SJK
LLWDL
Season result split
20% W30% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-6-10
0.90 pts / game · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-3-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LWLWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.50Opponent xG: 1.52BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Lahti
WLWDL
Season result split
35% W25% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-5-8
1.30 pts / game · goal difference +5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-2-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
LDWLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.27BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Lahti is 72% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.55 goals / game - SJK · 0.9 goals / game - Lahti

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 65% of games (13 of 20 meczów), while Lahti keeps a clean sheet in 40% (8 of 20 meczów).

Lahti scoring profile: very strong

Lahti scores in 70% of games (14 of 20 meczów), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 15% (3 of 20 meczów).

24Goals scored (season)23
SJKLahti
31Goals conceded (season)18
SJKLahti
2.75Average goals per game2.05
SJKLahti
6Goals scored (last 5)5
SJKLahti
8Goals conceded (last 5)3
SJKLahti

How often they score at least...

65%1 goal70%
SJKLahti
35%2 goals30%
SJKLahti
20%3 goals5%
SJKLahti
0%4 goals5%
SJKLahti

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal60%
SJKLahti
55%2 goals25%
SJKLahti
15%3 goals5%
SJKLahti
0%4 goals0%
SJKLahti

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time20%
SJKLahti
10%BTTS in both halves5%
SJKLahti
25%Scored in both halves25%
SJKLahti

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS25%
SJKLahti
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
SJKLahti
40%BTTS - last 520%
SJKLahti

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

80%Min. 1 goal before half-time70%
SJKLahti
25%Min. 2 goals before half-time30%
SJKLahti
5%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
SJKLahti

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time60%
SJKLahti
50%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
SJKLahti
25%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
SJKLahti

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Lahti is 61% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.9 pts / game - SJK · 1.45 pts / game - Lahti

SJK - half-time state
20% leading30% draw50% trailing
Lahti - half-time state
35% leading40% draw25% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.9Points per game (1st half)1.45
SJKLahti
0.35Goals scored (1st half)0.7
SJKLahti
0.75Goals conceded (1st half)0.45
SJKLahti
1.1Average goals (1st half)1.15
SJKLahti
40%Clean sheet before half-time65%
SJKLahti
65%No goal before half-time45%
SJKLahti

After half-time (2nd half)

1.35Points per game (2nd half)1.25
SJKLahti
0.85Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
SJKLahti
0.8Goals conceded (2nd half)0.45
SJKLahti
1.65Average goals (2nd half)0.9
SJKLahti
40%Clean sheet after half-time65%
SJKLahti
45%No goal after half-time60%
SJKLahti

SJK - second-half results

35% W30% R35% P
18
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-8
Goal difference (1st half)
27
Second-half points
+1
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.90
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 20%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Lahti - second-half results

25% W50% R25% P
29
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
+5
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding100%

Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SJK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.201.60
Goals scored / game0.21.0
Goals allowed / game1.20.4
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%80%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-5+3
Half-time: 0% leading - 20% draw - 80% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1
Lahti - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.60.4
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game1.20.4
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%0%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%100%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference0+2
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

SJK
ScoredConceded
2
7
0-15
1
4
16-30
4
4
31-45
4
13
46-60
4
1
61-75
9
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (13). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Lahti
ScoredConceded
6
2
0-15
4
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
4
2
46-60
4
3
61-75
1
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.40
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
48%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+108%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.11
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.5 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.38
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
79%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

Lahti

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.17
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.08
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-11.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
103%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
59%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.10
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
4% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
4%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

SJKLigaLahti
Average goals per game 2.752.63 2.05
Both teams scored 55%50% 40%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 55%48% 30%
Clean sheets 15%28% 40%
Goal before half-time 80%78% 70%
Goal after half-time 85%76% 60%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.63
Average goals per game
50%
Both teams scored
48%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
28%
Clean sheets
1.52
Home goals / game
1.12
Away goals / game
+36%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+23%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
3%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
36%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. LahtiYellow cardJosé Claro Müller
  2. LahtiYellow cardJosé Claro Müller
  3. LahtiSubstitutionOn: Väinö VehkonenOff: Martim Augusto Ferreira
  4. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  5. LahtiYellow cardRomaric Yapi
  6. LahtiYellow cardMamodou Sarr
  7. SJKYellow cardKelvin Spencer Pires
  8. SJKYellow cardRoope Paunio
  9. SJKYellow cardArmaan Wilson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from SJK's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Lahti. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of SJK vs Lahti?

The Veikkausliiga match finished SJK 1:2 Lahti. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK vs Lahti?

SJK score 1.20 goals per game on average and Lahti 1.15. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.63 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 48% of games. Both teams score in 55% of SJK's matches and 40% of Lahti's.

What form are SJK and Lahti in?

Over the last 5 games SJK have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Lahti 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK vs Lahti?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.