Finland - VeikkausliigaOmaSP StadionData current as of September 06, 2026

SJK vs TPS: match statistics

SJK crest
SJK
3 : 1half-time 1:0
TPS crest
TPS

SJK vs TPS: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

SJK played against TPS in Veikkausliiga (Finland). The game was played on July 4, 2026. Venue: OmaSP Stadion. Final score: 3:1.

Recent form

SJK has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. TPS has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

SJK scores 1.15 goals per game and allows 1.62. TPS scores 1.15 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 62% of SJK's games and 54% of TPS's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 38%, compared with league averages of 53% for BTTS and 46% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

SJK has the higher season xG average, 1.61 to 1.39 per game. SJK takes 13.5 shots per game, while TPS takes 10.9.

First-half and second-half trends

SJK leads at halftime in 23% of its games and scores 0.77 goals per game after halftime. TPS leads at halftime in 15% and scores 0.77 after halftime.

When the teams score

SJK's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For TPS, it is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Veikkausliiga games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 53% of games, and 46% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win (1) based on a clear advantage in quality of chances: SJK has home xG 1.92 versus TPS away xG 1.36, and averages 16.83 shots and 5.5 shots on target per game compared to 11 and 3.67 for the visitors. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 8 goals while the visitors scored only 5; although PPG over the last 5 is 1.0 for SJK and 1.4 for TPS, the away offensive efficiency for TPS is poor. SJK’s defense is, however, vulnerable — 21 goals conceded this season and an average of 1.33 goals conceded at home (9 conceded in the last 5), whereas TPS concede 13 goals this season but score only 0.67 goals on average away and fail to score in 50% of their away matches. Additionally, SJK controls the game at home (possession 56% vs 47%) and creates more chances, and TPS have no away wins (win% 0), which increases the home side’s probability. Considering SJK’s superior xG and shot volume and TPS’s weak away efficiency, I estimate probabilities of 55% for SJK, 30% for a draw and 15% for a TPS win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

SJK has 57% BTTS matches this season and 100% BTTS in the last 5 fixtures (5/5), while TPS records 50% for the season and 40% in the last 5 (2/5), which short-term favors the "both teams to score" scenario. At home SJK averages 1.57 goals with xG 1.42 and 5.0 shots on target, whereas TPS away averages 0.67 goals with xG 1.36 and 3.67 shots on target, so both teams create chances (xG 1.42 vs 1.36). Defensively SJK concedes on average 1.8 goals in the last 5 matches (9 conceded), and TPS 1.0 goal (5 conceded), increasing the likelihood of SJK conceding. The league has 54% BTTS matches with an average of 2.67 goals per game, and additionally SJK has 43% clean sheets at home versus 17% for TPS away, so a shutout for one team looks less likely; therefore, based on the above numbers I give 66% for "yes" and 34% for "no".

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Estimated xG is 1.35 for SJK and 1.57 for TPS (total 2.92 goals), calculated as the average of SJK’s attacking xG (1.42) vs the away defense (1.27) and TPS’s attacking xG (1.36) vs the home defense (1.77). With a Poisson distribution μ=2.92 the probability of more than 1.5 goals is about 79% (1 − P(≤1) ≈ 0.79), over 2.5 goals about 56%, and over 3.5 about 34%. Seasonal stats support the over: SJK has 71% of matches with over 1.5 goals, TPS 50%, and in the last 5 matches SJK averaged 1.6 scored and 1.8 conceded (total 3.4), while TPS averaged 2.0 goals per match in their last 5. Additionally SJK registers more shots on target (5.0 vs 3.67) and has a higher conversion rate (14% vs 6%), so the strongest signal is an over bet at the 1.5 line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a home win at Full-Time (X/1) — I assign this a 33% probability. SJK were level at the break in 43% of matches, and TPS in 67%, which strongly increases the likelihood of a lead at the break being a draw. Over the full match the home side dominate: SJK win 71% of home games and score on average 1.57 goals per match versus TPS’s 0.67, with SJK’s shot conversion rate at 14% compared to the opponents’ 6%. Additionally, SJK have a clear advantage after the break — averaging 1.14 goals in the second half, 100% of matches with at least one goal after Half-Time, plus 4 goals in the 46–60 minute window and 4 goals in 76–90 minutes — therefore I expect the home team to turn the game around after the break. As a result X/1 is the strongest signal, while scenarios 1/1 (25%) and 2/1 (14%) are less likely.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

44Possession (%)56
SJKTPS
18Shots21
SJKTPS
6Shots on target4
SJKTPS
2.02xG2.35
SJKTPS
6Corners7
SJKTPS
66Dangerous attacks105
SJKTPS
13Fouls4
SJKTPS
3Cards0
SJKTPS

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.15Goals scored / game1.15
SJKTPS
1.62Goals allowed / game1
SJKTPS
52%Average possession47%
SJKTPS
4.92Shots on target / game4.38
SJKTPS

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

13.46Shots per game10.92
SJKTPS
4.92Shots on target4.38
SJKTPS
8.6%Shot conversion10.6%
SJKTPS
52%Possession47%
SJKTPS
1.61xG for1.39
SJKTPS
1.38xG against1.54
SJKTPS

Shooting quality

SJK: BalancedTPS: Balanced
SJKTPS
Accuracy (shots on target)37%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.230.26

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

TPS is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - SJK · 1.4 pts / game - TPS

SJK
LWLDD
Season result split
15% W38% R46% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-5-6
0.85 pts / game · goal difference -6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-3
Last 5 at home
0-2-3
DDLLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.53Opponent xG: 1.45BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 80%
TPS
WLLDW
Season result split
38% W31% R31% P
Season (W-D-L)
5-4-4
1.46 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
0-3-3
Last 5 away
0-2-3
DLLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.48Opponent xG: 1.65BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

TPS is 62% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.62 goals / game - SJK · 1 goals / game - TPS

SJK scoring profile: strong

SJK scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while TPS keeps a clean sheet in 31% (4 of 13 meczów).

TPS scoring profile: very strong

TPS scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while SJK keeps a clean sheet in 15% (2 of 13 meczów).

15Goals scored (season)15
SJKTPS
21Goals conceded (season)13
SJKTPS
2.77Average goals per game2.15
SJKTPS
9Goals scored (last 5)5
SJKTPS
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
SJKTPS

How often they score at least...

69%1 goal77%
SJKTPS
31%2 goals31%
SJKTPS
15%3 goals8%
SJKTPS
0%4 goals0%
SJKTPS

How often they concede at least...

85%1 goal69%
SJKTPS
54%2 goals31%
SJKTPS
23%3 goals0%
SJKTPS
0%4 goals0%
SJKTPS

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time23%
SJKTPS
15%BTTS in both halves8%
SJKTPS
23%Scored in both halves31%
SJKTPS

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
SJKTPS
15%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SJKTPS
100%BTTS - last 540%
SJKTPS

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
SJKTPS
23%Min. 2 goals before half-time23%
SJKTPS
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time15%
SJKTPS

2nd half

85%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
SJKTPS
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time38%
SJKTPS
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
SJKTPS

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

SJK - half-time state
23% leading31% draw46% trailing
TPS - half-time state
15% leading54% draw31% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1
SJKTPS
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.38
SJKTPS
0.69Goals conceded (1st half)0.54
SJKTPS
1.08Average goals (1st half)0.92
SJKTPS
38%Clean sheet before half-time62%
SJKTPS
62%No goal before half-time62%
SJKTPS

After half-time (2nd half)

1.23Points per game (2nd half)1.62
SJKTPS
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.77
SJKTPS
0.92Goals conceded (2nd half)0.46
SJKTPS
1.69Average goals (2nd half)1.23
SJKTPS
38%Clean sheet after half-time54%
SJKTPS
46%No goal after half-time31%
SJKTPS

SJK - second-half results

31% W31% R38% P
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
16
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding65%

Leads at halftime in 23% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

TPS - second-half results

38% W46% R15% P
13
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
-2
Goal difference (1st half)
21
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding253%

Leads at halftime in 15% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

SJK - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.800.80
Goals scored / game0.81.0
Goals allowed / game0.41.6
Average goals per game1.22.6
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%0%
No goal20%40%
Goal difference+2-3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 4
TPS - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.601.60
Goals scored / game0.20.8
Goals allowed / game0.60.4
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal40%80%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

SJK
ScoredConceded
1
5
0-15
1
2
16-30
3
2
31-45
2
10
46-60
1
0
61-75
7
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

TPS
ScoredConceded
1
0
0-15
2
3
16-30
2
4
31-45
4
2
46-60
0
3
61-75
6
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +5 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.46
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
93%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
58%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-19%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
53%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
7%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 14 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

SJK

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.23
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.70
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.46
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.24
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
77%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
140%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.15
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
47% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
47%

TPS

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.15
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.30
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-3.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.24
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.54
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
99%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
67%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.06
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
40% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
40%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Veikkausliiga).

Teams vs league

SJKLigaTPS
Average goals per game 2.772.65 2.15
Both teams scored 62%53% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 54%46% 38%
Clean sheets 15%27% 31%
Goal before half-time 85%73% 54%
Goal after half-time 85%78% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.65
Average goals per game
53%
Both teams scored
46%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
27%
Clean sheets
1.49
Home goals / game
1.16
Away goals / game
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defensive advantage
+24%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
73%
1 goal
34%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
78%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SJKYellow cardEze Onuoha
  2. SJKYellow cardKasper Paananen
  3. TPSSubstitutionOn: Kian VisserOff: Lasse Ikonen
  4. SJKSubstitutionOn: Elias MastokangasOff: Jaakko Moisio

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from SJK's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against TPS. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of SJK vs TPS?

The Veikkausliiga match finished SJK 3:1 TPS. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before SJK vs TPS?

SJK score 1.15 goals per game on average and TPS 1.15. The Veikkausliiga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 46% of games. Both teams score in 62% of SJK's matches and 54% of TPS's.

What form are SJK and TPS in?

Over the last 5 games SJK have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and TPS 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for SJK vs TPS?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.