Egypt - Egyptian Premier LeagueAlexandria StadiumData current as of October 22, 2026

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: match statistics

Smouha SC crest
Smouha SC
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Ceramica Cleopatra crest
Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Smouha SC played against Ceramica Cleopatra in Egyptian Premier League (Egypt). The game was played on September 8, 2026. Venue: Alexandria Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Smouha SC has 0 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.33 points per game. Ceramica Cleopatra has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.

Scoring records

Smouha SC scores 0.00 goals per game and allows 0.67. Ceramica Cleopatra scores 2.00 and allows 1.00. Games in this league average 2.03 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 0% of Smouha SC's games and 67% of Ceramica Cleopatra's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 67%, compared with league averages of 38% for BTTS and 32% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Ceramica Cleopatra has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 0.97 per game. Smouha SC takes 7.7 shots per game, while Ceramica Cleopatra takes 14.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Smouha SC leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Ceramica Cleopatra leads at halftime in 100% and scores 1.00 after halftime.

When the teams score

Smouha SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). For Ceramica Cleopatra, it is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Egyptian Premier League games average 2.03 goals. Both teams score in 38% of games, and 32% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Ceramica Cleopatra sit 4th, while Smouha SC are only 17th, with the two teams’ records after three matches standing at 2 wins and 1 loss for the visitors, compared with 0 wins for the hosts. Smouha have scored just 1 goal in their last five matches and lost 4 of them, which contrasts sharply with Ceramica’s 7 goals over the same period. Away from home, Ceramica average 3 goals per match, record 7 shots on target and create chances worth 1.72 xG, whereas Smouha are yet to score at home despite averaging 12 shots and 1.38 xG. The hosts can rely on a solid defensive setup, having kept a clean sheet in their only home match, but Ceramica’s average 61% possession and 14 shots away from home should give the visitors the edge. An away win is the most likely outcome, although Smouha’s low scoring efficiency and defensive record to date also increase the chances of a draw.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The stronger signal is BTTS - No, as Smouha have scored just 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, while their BTTS rate was only 20%. The hosts do have a season xG of 1.68, but their current xG has dropped to 0.95, confirming a clear decline in chance creation. Ceramica Cleopatra have yet to keep a clean sheet this season and have recorded BTTS in 100% of their matches, but the visitors’ defense has allowed an average xG of just 1.13 over their last five appearances. The visitors are the favorites to score, having recently averaged 1.4 goals per game, while Smouha’s very low attacking efficiency remains the biggest risk to the both-teams-to-score scenario. Additionally, the league has recorded goals from both teams in only 33% of matches, with an average of 1.97 goals per game, further supporting the outcome in which at least one side fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Smouha’s latest form clearly limits the hosts’ goal-scoring potential: they have scored only 1 goal in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.2 per game, with an xG of 0.95. Ceramica are more dangerous, averaging 1.4 goals and an xG of 1.45 across their last five matches, but their attack faces a team conceding an average of 1.0 goal. Both teams have conceded 5 goals in their last 5 appearances, pointing more towards a 1:1 or 0:2 scoreline than an open, high-scoring game. Although Ceramica averaged 3.0 goals per match at the start of the season, the league averages only 1.97 goals per game, while Smouha have exceeded 2.5 goals in just 20% of their last five matches. The Under 3.5 goals line has the edge, as the projected total of 2.10 goals leaves a clear margin below four goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Ceramica Cleopatra are in clearly better current form: over their last five matches, they have averaged 1.4 goals and won 40% of their games, while Smouha have scored just 0.2 goals per match, failed to win any of them, and lost 80%. The hosts were level at half-time in all of their last five appearances, averaging just 0.2 goals scored in the first half. The visitors led at the break in 60% of their recent matches and averaged 0.8 goals by that point; however, the league’s cautious profile, with a goal scored before half-time in only 47% of matches, increases the likelihood of a draw at the break. After the interval, Ceramica have averaged 0.6 goals over their last five matches, while Smouha have failed to score in this period and conceded an average of 0.8. The HT/FT scenario of a draw at half-time followed by an away win, represented by X/2, best combines Smouha’s poor attacking form with Ceramica’s superior quality and efficiency, as they have averaged 3.0 goals per match this season with a 21% shot-conversion rate.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

48Possession (%)52
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
9Shots5
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3Shots on target3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.21xG0.89
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
4Corners3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
61Dangerous attacks51
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
7Fouls13
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
3Cards1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored / game2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Goals allowed / game1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
45%Average possession64%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Shots on target / game6.33
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.67Shots per game14.33
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Shots on target6.33
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Shot conversion14%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
45%Possession64%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.97xG for1.69
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
1.26xG against1.21
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Shooting quality

Smouha SC: BalancedCeramica Cleopatra: Dominant
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
Accuracy (shots on target)26%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.000.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 506% better for: last-5 form.

0.33 pts / game - Smouha SC · 2 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC
LDL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
0% W33% D67% L
Season (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game · goal difference -2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-2
0.33 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
0-1-0
Last 5 at home
0-1-0
D
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.0Goals conceded: 0.7xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.26BTTS: 0%Over 2.5: 0%
Ceramica Cleopatra
LWW
Season result split
67% W0% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-1
2.00 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-0-0
Last 5 away
1-0-0
W
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.69Opponent xG: 1.21BTTS: 67%Over 2.5: 67%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Smouha SC is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.67 goals / game - Smouha SC · 1 goals / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC scoring profile: more difficult

Smouha SC scores in 0% of games (0 of 3 games), while Ceramica Cleopatra keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).

Ceramica Cleopatra scoring profile: very strong

Ceramica Cleopatra scores in 100% of games (3 of 3 games), while Smouha SC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).

0Goals scored (season)6
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Goals conceded (season)3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Average goals per game3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored (last 5)6
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
2Goals conceded (last 5)3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they score at least...

0%1 goal100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%2 goals67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

How often they concede at least...

67%1 goal67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%2 goals33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%3 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%4 goals0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

38%
League average

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Scored in both halves67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

BTTS and goal count

0%Min. 3 goals and BTTS67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%BTTS - last 567%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

0%Min. 1 goal before half-time100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 2 goals before half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

2nd half

67%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 2 goals after half-time67%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Ceramica Cleopatra is 200% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Smouha SC · 3 pts / game - Ceramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC - half-time state
0% leading100% draw0% trailing
Ceramica Cleopatra - half-time state
100% leading0% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)3
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored (1st half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals conceded (1st half)0
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Average goals (1st half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
100%Clean sheet before half-time100%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
100%No goal before half-time0%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

After half-time (2nd half)

0.33Points per game (2nd half)2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0Goals scored (2nd half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Goals conceded (2nd half)1
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
0.67Average goals (2nd half)2
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
33%Clean sheet after half-time33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra
100%No goal after half-time33%
Smouha SCCeramica Cleopatra

Smouha SC - second-half results

0% W33% D67% L
3
Half-time points
0
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
1
Second-half points
-2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Defense after halftime+0.7

Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Ceramica Cleopatra - second-half results

67% W0% D33% L
9
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
6
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
3.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding67%

Leads at halftime in 100% of games and wins 67%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Smouha SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.33
Goals scored / game0.00.0
Goals allowed / game0.00.7
Average goals per game0.00.7
1 goal0%67%
2 goals0%0%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal100%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 0% leading - 100% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 33% draw - 67% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
Ceramica Cleopatra - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game3.002.00
Goals scored / game1.01.0
Goals allowed / game0.01.0
Average goals per game1.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals0%67%
3 goals0%33%
Clean sheet100%33%
No goal0%33%
Goal difference+30
Half-time: 100% leading - 0% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 67% won - 0% draw - 33% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Smouha SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
0
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
0
2
76-90

Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.

Ceramica Cleopatra
ScoredConceded
2
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
1
0
31-45
0
1
46-60
2
0
61-75
1
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.83
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 1.3
Estimated goal split
home : away
90%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
34%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-18%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
0%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
0%
0:0 risk
practically zero
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Smouha SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.38
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.97
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.59
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
0%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
61%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Ceramica Cleopatra

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
183%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
106%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
17% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 33% come in the first quarter-hour.
17%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Egyptian Premier League).

Teams vs league

Smouha SCLigaCeramica Cleopatra
Average goals per game▼ 0.672.03▲ 3.00
Both teams scored▼ 0%38%▲ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 0%32%▲ 67%
Clean sheets▼ 33%38%▼ 33%
Goal before half-time▼ 0%50%▲ 100%
Goal after half-time▼ 67%76%▲ 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.03
Average goals per game
38%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
0.94
Home goals / game
1.09
Away goals / game
+-14%
Home attack advantage
+-16%
Home defensive advantage
+-3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
50%
1 goal
18%
2 goals
6%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
0%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Ceramica CleopatraYellow cardAhmed Ramadan Mohamed
  2. Smouha SCYellow cardPape Abasse Badji
  3. Smouha SCYellow cardSamir Fekri Mohamed Ahmed
  4. Smouha SCYellow cardKone Mohamed
  5. Ceramica CleopatraAssistAhmed Belhadji
  6. Ceramica CleopatraGoalHussein Al Sayed
  7. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Ragab NabilOff: Nejc Gradišar
  8. Ceramica CleopatraSubstitutionOn: Fawzi El HenawiOff: Mohamed Reda
  9. Smouha SCSubstitutionOn: Hesham NabawiOff: Khaled Metwali Abdelhamid

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Smouha SC's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Ceramica Cleopatra. Games average 1.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

Smouha SC
0 : 2
Ceramica Cleopatra
Ceramica Cleopatra
1 : 0
Smouha SC

FAQ

What was the result of Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

The Egyptian Premier League match finished Smouha SC 0:2 Ceramica Cleopatra. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Smouha SC won 0, Ceramica Cleopatra won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

Smouha SC score 0.00 goals per game on average and Ceramica Cleopatra 2.00. The Egyptian Premier League average is 2.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Smouha SC's matches and 67% of Ceramica Cleopatra's.

What form are Smouha SC and Ceramica Cleopatra in?

Over the last 5 games Smouha SC have a 0-1-2 record (0.33 points per game) and Ceramica Cleopatra 2-0-1 (2.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Smouha SC vs Ceramica Cleopatra?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.