Sogdiana vs Nasaf: match statistics
Nasaf displays clearly better form than Sogdiana, which is visible in the record of the last five matches – the visitors earned 1.6 points per match with two victories and two draws, while the hosts obtained only 1.2 points with two wins and three defeats. Sogdiana sits in a very low 16th position in the table with one season loss and no goals scored in official home matches, evidencing serious offensive problems. Nasaf, on the other hand, occupies 7th place, has a hundred percent efficiency in the season (1 victory, 0 defeats), and has not yet conceded a goal in league competitions. The difference in goal difference over the last five meetings (5:8 for Sogdiana against 4:3 for Nasaf) and the visitors' better form point to their advantage. Considering all statistics, Nasaf has a real chance to secure three points, although the specific nature of an away match and the lack of detailed home/away data dictate caution in forecasting.
Sogdiana vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sogdiana played against Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on March 6, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Sogdiana has 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Nasaf has 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Sogdiana scores 0.00 goals per game and allows 4.00. Nasaf scores 1.00 and allows 0.00. Games in this league average 2.43 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Sogdiana's games and 0% of Nasaf's. The Over 2.5 rates are 100% and 0%, compared with league averages of 36% for BTTS and 57% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Nasaf has the higher season xG average, 1.69 to 0.80 per game. Sogdiana takes 6.0 shots per game, while Nasaf takes 16.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Sogdiana leads at halftime in 0% of its games and scores 0.00 goals per game after halftime. Nasaf leads at halftime in 0% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sogdiana's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (0 goals). For Nasaf, it is minutes 76-90+ (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.43 goals. Both teams score in 36% of games, and 57% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Nasaf displays clearly better form than Sogdiana, which is visible in the record of the last five matches – the visitors earned 1.6 points per match with two victories and two draws, while the hosts obtained only 1.2 points with two wins and three defeats. Sogdiana sits in a very low 16th position in the table with one season loss and no goals scored in official home matches, evidencing serious offensive problems. Nasaf, on the other hand, occupies 7th place, has a hundred percent efficiency in the season (1 victory, 0 defeats), and has not yet conceded a goal in league competitions. The difference in goal difference over the last five meetings (5:8 for Sogdiana against 4:3 for Nasaf) and the visitors' better form point to their advantage. Considering all statistics, Nasaf has a real chance to secure three points, although the specific nature of an away match and the lack of detailed home/away data dictate caution in forecasting.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sogdiana | Nasaf | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 31% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.00 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogdiana scores in 0% of games (0 of 1 meczów), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 100% (1 of 1 meczów).
Nasaf scores in 100% of games (1 of 1 meczów), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 1 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sogdiana
Over / Under - Nasaf
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sogdiana - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Nasaf - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 100% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 0% |
| No goal | 100% | 100% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 3.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 0% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 0% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Concedes most in 0-15 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (1 goal). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sogdiana
Nasaf
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Sogdiana | Liga | Nasaf | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 2.43 | ▼ 1.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 36% | ▼ 0% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 100% | 57% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 32% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 64% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 79% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Sogdiana's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Nasaf. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sogdiana vs Nasaf?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Sogdiana 0:2 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sogdiana and Nasaf?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sogdiana won 0, Nasaf won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sogdiana vs Nasaf?
Sogdiana score 0.00 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.00. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.43 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 57% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Sogdiana's matches and 0% of Nasaf's.
What form are Sogdiana and Nasaf in?
Over the last 5 games Sogdiana have a 0-0-1 record (0.00 points per game) and Nasaf 1-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogdiana vs Nasaf?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.