Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of 23 July 2026

Sogdiana vs Nasaf: match statistics

Sogdiana crest
Sogdiana
0 : 2half-time 0:2
Nasaf crest
Nasaf
125%(0.00)
X30%(0.00)
245%(0.00)

Nasaf displays clearly better form than Sogdiana, which is visible in the record of the last five matches – the visitors earned 1.6 points per match with two victories and two draws, while the hosts obtained only 1.2 points with two wins and three defeats. Sogdiana sits in a very low 16th position in the table with one season loss and no goals scored in official home matches, evidencing serious offensive problems. Nasaf, on the other hand, occupies 7th place, has a hundred percent efficiency in the season (1 victory, 0 defeats), and has not yet conceded a goal in league competitions. The difference in goal difference over the last five meetings (5:8 for Sogdiana against 4:3 for Nasaf) and the visitors' better form point to their advantage. Considering all statistics, Nasaf has a real chance to secure three points, although the specific nature of an away match and the lack of detailed home/away data dictate caution in forecasting.

Sogdiana vs Nasaf: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Sogdiana play Nasaf in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The match date is 6 March 2026 at 15:15. Final score: 0:2.

Current form

Sogdiana: 2-1-2, 1.40 points/match. Nasaf: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Sogdiana scores 1.69 and concedes 2.31 goals per match. Nasaf scores 1.25 and concedes 1.00. League average: 2.59 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Sogdiana 77%, Nasaf 58%. Over 2.5: Sogdiana 77%, Nasaf 33%. League level: BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

xG, shots and style

Nasaf has higher xG: 1.39 vs 1.38. Sogdiana: 11.2 shots per match, Nasaf: 12.1.

Match halves

Sogdiana: half-time lead 46%, second-half goals 0.77. Nasaf: half-time lead 8%, second-half goals 0.83.

Goals by minute

Sogdiana: 16-30 (5 goals). Nasaf: 76-90+ (5 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Uzbekistan Super League: 2.59 goals per match, BTTS 55%, Over 2.5 53%.

Head-to-head

2 H2H matches: 0-0-2. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Nasaf displays clearly better form than Sogdiana, which is visible in the record of the last five matches – the visitors earned 1.6 points per match with two victories and two draws, while the hosts obtained only 1.2 points with two wins and three defeats. Sogdiana sits in a very low 16th position in the table with one season loss and no goals scored in official home matches, evidencing serious offensive problems. Nasaf, on the other hand, occupies 7th place, has a hundred percent efficiency in the season (1 victory, 0 defeats), and has not yet conceded a goal in league competitions. The difference in goal difference over the last five meetings (5:8 for Sogdiana against 4:3 for Nasaf) and the visitors' better form point to their advantage. Considering all statistics, Nasaf has a real chance to secure three points, although the specific nature of an away match and the lack of detailed home/away data dictate caution in forecasting.

Half-by-half

0 : 2
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

56Possession (%)44
SogdianaNasaf
14Shots11
SogdianaNasaf
5Shots on target3
SogdianaNasaf
1.72xG1.35
SogdianaNasaf
7Corners6
SogdianaNasaf
66Dangerous attacks61
SogdianaNasaf
5Fouls14
SogdianaNasaf
0Cards2
SogdianaNasaf

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.69Goals scored / match1.25
SogdianaNasaf
2.31Goals conceded / match1
SogdianaNasaf
41%Average possession51%
SogdianaNasaf
4.54Shots on target / match3.92
SogdianaNasaf

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

11.15Shots per match12.08
SogdianaNasaf
4.54Shots on target3.92
SogdianaNasaf
15.2%Shot conversion10.3%
SogdianaNasaf
41%Possession51%
SogdianaNasaf
1.38xG for1.39
SogdianaNasaf
1.45xG against1.39
SogdianaNasaf

Shooting quality

Sogdiana: Counter-attackingNasaf: Balanced
SogdianaNasaf
Accuracy (shots on target)41%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Sogdiana is 40% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Sogdiana · 1 pts / match - Nasaf

Sogdiana
DWLWL
Season result split
23% W23% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-3-7
0.92 pts / match · goal difference -8
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
DLWWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 2.0Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.33Opponent xG: 1.34BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 60%
Nasaf
LLDDW
Season result split
33% W42% R25% P
Season (W-D-L)
4-5-3
1.42 pts / match · goal difference +3
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
2-3-1
Last 5 away
1-3-1
DDLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.28Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sogdiana is 35% better for: goals scored per match.

1.69 goals / match - Sogdiana · 1.25 goals / match - Nasaf

Nasaf is 131% better for: goals conceded per match.

2.31 goals / match - Sogdiana · 1 goals / match - Nasaf

Sogdiana scoring profile: very strong

Sogdiana scores in 85% of matches (11 of 13 matches), while Nasaf keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 matches).

Nasaf scoring profile: very strong

Nasaf scores in 83% of matches (10 of 12 matches), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 8% (1 of 13 matches).

22Goals scored (season)15
SogdianaNasaf
30Goals conceded (season)12
SogdianaNasaf
4Average goals in match2.25
SogdianaNasaf
10Goals scored (last 5)8
SogdianaNasaf
10Goals conceded (last 5)8
SogdianaNasaf

How often they score at least...

85%1 goal83%
SogdianaNasaf
54%2 goals33%
SogdianaNasaf
15%3 goals8%
SogdianaNasaf
8%4 goals0%
SogdianaNasaf

How often they concede at least...

92%1 goal67%
SogdianaNasaf
77%2 goals25%
SogdianaNasaf
31%3 goals8%
SogdianaNasaf
23%4 goals0%
SogdianaNasaf

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

23%BTTS at half-time25%
SogdianaNasaf
8%BTTS in both halves8%
SogdianaNasaf
38%Scored in both halves17%
SogdianaNasaf

BTTS and goal count

69%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
SogdianaNasaf
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
SogdianaNasaf
80%BTTS - last 580%
SogdianaNasaf

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

85%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
SogdianaNasaf
62%Min. 2 goals before half-time33%
SogdianaNasaf
15%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SogdianaNasaf

2nd half

92%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
SogdianaNasaf
85%Min. 2 goals after half-time42%
SogdianaNasaf
31%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
SogdianaNasaf

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sogdiana is 62% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.62 pts / match - Sogdiana · 1 pts / match - Nasaf

Sogdiana - half-time state
46% leading23% draw31% trailing
Nasaf - half-time state
8% leading75% draw17% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.62Points per match (1st half)1
SogdianaNasaf
0.92Goals scored (1st half)0.42
SogdianaNasaf
0.77Goals conceded (1st half)0.42
SogdianaNasaf
1.69Average goals (1st half)0.83
SogdianaNasaf
54%Clean sheet before half-time58%
SogdianaNasaf
38%No goal before half-time67%
SogdianaNasaf

After half-time (2nd half)

0.77Points per match (2nd half)1.58
SogdianaNasaf
0.77Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
SogdianaNasaf
1.54Goals conceded (2nd half)0.58
SogdianaNasaf
2.31Average goals (2nd half)1.42
SogdianaNasaf
15%Clean sheet after half-time50%
SogdianaNasaf
38%No goal after half-time33%
SogdianaNasaf

Sogdiana - second-half results

15% W31% R54% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
10
Second-half points
-10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.62
PPG before half-time
Lead holding50%

Leads at half-time in 46% of matches and wins 23%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time+0.8

Concedes 0.8 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Nasaf - second-half results

42% W33% R25% P
12
Half-time points
5
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
+3
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding413%

Leads at half-time in 8% of matches and wins 33%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Sogdiana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.401.60
Goals scored / match0.81.2
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.62.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference00
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 4
Nasaf - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.40
Goals scored / match0.61.0
Goals conceded / match0.80.8
Average goals in match1.41.8
1 goal80%80%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet20%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Sogdiana
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
5
2
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
8
46-60
5
5
61-75
3
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

Nasaf
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
2
1
16-30
1
3
31-45
3
0
46-60
2
3
61-75
5
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (4). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.13
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.3 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
121%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
68%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-36%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Sogdiana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.07
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.55
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-1.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.86
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
126%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
186%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.48
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Nasaf

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
0.00
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.25
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.14
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
101%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
75%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.42
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
33% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
33%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

SogdianaLigaNasaf
Average goals in match 4.002.59 2.25
Both teams scored 77%55% 58%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%53% 33%
Clean sheets 8%26% 33%
Goal before half-time 85%69% 50%
Goal after half-time 92%79% 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.59
Average goals per match
55%
Both teams scored
53%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.34
Home goals / match
1.24
Away goals / match
+8%
Home attack advantage
+7%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
69%
1 goal
39%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
79%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
14%
3 goals
2%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (2): Sogdiana 0 - 0 - 2 Nasaf. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 50% matches.

FK Sogdiana Jizak
1 : 2
FC Nasaf Qarshi
FC Nasaf Qarshi
1 : 0
FK Sogdiana Jizak

FAQ

What was the result of Sogdiana vs Nasaf?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Sogdiana 0:2 Nasaf. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sogdiana and Nasaf?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Sogdiana won 0, Nasaf won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sogdiana vs Nasaf?

Sogdiana score 1.69 goals per game on average and Nasaf 1.25. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.59 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 77% of Sogdiana's matches and 58% of Nasaf's.

What form are Sogdiana and Nasaf in?

Over the last 5 games Sogdiana have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Nasaf 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogdiana vs Nasaf?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.