Uzbekistan - Uzbekistan Super LeagueData current as of August 30, 2026

Sogdiana vs Qizilqum: match statistics

Sogdiana crest
Sogdiana
2 : 1half-time 1:0
Qizilqum crest
Qizilqum

Sogdiana vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Sogdiana played against Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on August 18, 2026. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Sogdiana has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Qizilqum has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Sogdiana scores 1.76 goals per game and allows 2.06. Qizilqum scores 0.88 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 76% of Sogdiana's games and 29% of Qizilqum's. The Over 2.5 rates are 76% and 41%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Sogdiana has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.15 per game. Sogdiana takes 12.0 shots per game, while Qizilqum takes 9.2.

First-half and second-half trends

Sogdiana leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Qizilqum leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.29 after halftime.

When the teams score

Sogdiana's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Qizilqum, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Sogdiana have a clear edge in recent form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.8 points per game, while Qizilqum managed just 0.8 points per match. The hosts average 1.88 goals at home, whereas the visitors score only 0.50 away from home and have failed to find the net in as many as 63% of such matches. The difference in chance creation is reflected in Sogdiana’s average of 5.5 shots on target compared with Qizilqum’s 2.75, as well as the hosts’ xG of 1.52 versus 1.11 for the visitors. Sogdiana do concede 2.25 goals per home game, but Qizilqum’s poor away attacking output and 63% away-loss rate point towards a home win. Qizilqum may exploit their opponents’ defensive issues, but the more likely scenario is that Sogdiana will create more chances and claim all three points.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Qizilqum’s very low scoring efficiency throughout the season: the visitors average just 0.50 goals and failed to score in 63% of their matches. Their season BTTS rate is only 13%, clearly below Sogdiana’s 50% and the league average of 54%. The last five matches provide slightly more support for a Goal/Goal outcome, as Sogdiana scored 1.8 goals, while both teams conceded 2.0 and 1.8 goals per match respectively. Nevertheless, Qizilqum scored only 1.0 goal in this run, recording an xG of 1.01, while the hosts kept a clean sheet in 25% of their matches. Sogdiana should have good conditions to score, with opponents’ xG against them standing at 1.57, but the greater risk concerns the visitors finding the net. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Sogdiana have averaged 1.8 goals scored and 2.0 conceded over their last five matches, while Qizilqum have scored 1.0 and allowed 1.8 goals, lifting the projection to around 2.45 goals. However, the hosts possess greater attacking potential: their average xG stands at 1.21, compared with Qizilqum’s 1.11, although the visitors have scored just 0.50 goals per game throughout the season. The 3.5 line remains high, as only 25% of Sogdiana’s matches and 13% of Qizilqum’s games went over four goals. In addition, Qizilqum failed to score in 63% of their matches, while both teams kept a clean sheet in 25% of games, limiting the risk of a very high-scoring outcome. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the season data and expected goal tally clearly support a result with a maximum of three goals.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sogdiana win at full-time, as Qizilqum were level at the break in 63% of their matches, including 50% of their last five. Both teams have limited attacking output before the break: Sogdiana average 0.43 goals, while Qizilqum average just 0.25, and the visitors have failed to lead at half-time in any of their last five appearances. After the interval, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who have averaged 1.4 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 0.25 for Qizilqum. Sogdiana have won 60% of their last five games and average 1.8 points per match over this period, compared with Qizilqum’s 20% win rate and 0.8 points per match. In addition, the hosts create slightly better scoring opportunities, with an average xG of 1.21 compared with their opponents’ 1.11, while the visitors’ defense allows an average xG of 1.57.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
1 : 1
Second half

Game stats

54Possession (%)46
SogdianaQizilqum
11Shots9
SogdianaQizilqum
6Shots on target3
SogdianaQizilqum
1.46xG1.27
SogdianaQizilqum
3Corners7
SogdianaQizilqum
49Dangerous attacks68
SogdianaQizilqum
-1Fouls-1
SogdianaQizilqum
2Cards1
SogdianaQizilqum

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.76Goals scored / game0.88
SogdianaQizilqum
2.06Goals allowed / game1.41
SogdianaQizilqum
41%Average possession37%
SogdianaQizilqum
5.18Shots on target / game2.41
SogdianaQizilqum

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12Shots per game9.18
SogdianaQizilqum
5.18Shots on target2.41
SogdianaQizilqum
14.7%Shot conversion9.6%
SogdianaQizilqum
41%Possession37%
SogdianaQizilqum
1.49xG for1.15
SogdianaQizilqum
1.44xG against1.44
SogdianaQizilqum

Shooting quality

Sogdiana: Counter-attackingQizilqum: Balanced
SogdianaQizilqum
Accuracy (shots on target)43%26%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.340.37

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Sogdiana is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.8 pts / game - Sogdiana · 1.4 pts / game - Qizilqum

Sogdiana
LLWWW
Season result split
35% W18% R47% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-8
1.24 pts / game · goal difference -5
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-0-2
1.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-4
Last 5 at home
3-0-2
LWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.71Opponent xG: 1.47BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Qizilqum
DLWLW
Season result split
35% W12% R53% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-2-9
1.18 pts / game · goal difference -9
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
WLDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.02Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 40%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Sogdiana is 100% better for: goals scored per game.

1.76 goals / game - Sogdiana · 0.88 goals / game - Qizilqum

Qizilqum is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.06 goals / game - Sogdiana · 1.41 goals / game - Qizilqum

Sogdiana scoring profile: very strong

Sogdiana scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).

Qizilqum scoring profile: strong

Qizilqum scores in 53% of games (9 of 17 meczów), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).

30Goals scored (season)15
SogdianaQizilqum
35Goals conceded (season)24
SogdianaQizilqum
3.82Average goals per game2.29
SogdianaQizilqum
9Goals scored (last 5)6
SogdianaQizilqum
10Goals conceded (last 5)7
SogdianaQizilqum

How often they score at least...

88%1 goal53%
SogdianaQizilqum
53%2 goals29%
SogdianaQizilqum
24%3 goals6%
SogdianaQizilqum
6%4 goals0%
SogdianaQizilqum

How often they concede at least...

88%1 goal71%
SogdianaQizilqum
65%2 goals35%
SogdianaQizilqum
29%3 goals18%
SogdianaQizilqum
18%4 goals12%
SogdianaQizilqum

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

18%BTTS at half-time12%
SogdianaQizilqum
6%BTTS in both halves0%
SogdianaQizilqum
35%Scored in both halves12%
SogdianaQizilqum

BTTS and goal count

71%Min. 3 goals and BTTS24%
SogdianaQizilqum
6%Min. 3 goals without BTTS18%
SogdianaQizilqum
80%BTTS - last 520%
SogdianaQizilqum

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

76%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
SogdianaQizilqum
47%Min. 2 goals before half-time41%
SogdianaQizilqum
12%Min. 3 goals before half-time6%
SogdianaQizilqum

2nd half

94%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
SogdianaQizilqum
82%Min. 2 goals after half-time29%
SogdianaQizilqum
41%Min. 3 goals after half-time6%
SogdianaQizilqum

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Sogdiana is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.53 pts / game - Sogdiana · 1.12 pts / game - Qizilqum

Sogdiana - half-time state
41% leading29% draw29% trailing
Qizilqum - half-time state
24% leading41% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.53Points per game (1st half)1.12
SogdianaQizilqum
0.76Goals scored (1st half)0.41
SogdianaQizilqum
0.65Goals conceded (1st half)0.71
SogdianaQizilqum
1.41Average goals (1st half)1.12
SogdianaQizilqum
59%Clean sheet before half-time53%
SogdianaQizilqum
47%No goal before half-time71%
SogdianaQizilqum

After half-time (2nd half)

1.12Points per game (2nd half)1
SogdianaQizilqum
1Goals scored (2nd half)0.29
SogdianaQizilqum
1.41Goals conceded (2nd half)0.71
SogdianaQizilqum
2.41Average goals (2nd half)1
SogdianaQizilqum
24%Clean sheet after half-time53%
SogdianaQizilqum
29%No goal after half-time71%
SogdianaQizilqum

Sogdiana - second-half results

29% W24% R47% P
26
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
19
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.53
PPG before half-time
Lead holding85%

Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 35%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.8

Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Qizilqum - second-half results

18% W47% R35% P
19
Half-time points
7
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
17
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.12
PPG before half-time
Lead holding146%

Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Sogdiana - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.80
Goals scored / game0.41.4
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.22.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%80%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%20%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Qizilqum - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.60
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game0.60.8
Average goals per game1.20.8
1 goal60%40%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 60% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Sogdiana
ScoredConceded
5
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
6
9
46-60
5
6
61-75
6
9
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Qizilqum
ScoredConceded
4
3
0-15
2
5
16-30
4
4
31-45
1
3
46-60
1
5
61-75
3
4
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.05
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
115%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
53%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-24%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
47%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Sogdiana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.05
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.35
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.62
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
124%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
166%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.56
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

Qizilqum

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.29
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.24
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+5.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.03
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
99%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 27% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).

Teams vs league

SogdianaLigaQizilqum
Average goals per game 3.822.66 2.29
Both teams scored 76%55% 29%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 76%54% 41%
Clean sheets 12%26% 29%
Goal before half-time 76%68% 65%
Goal after half-time 94%76% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.66
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.42
Home goals / game
1.24
Away goals / game
+15%
Home attack advantage
+13%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
38%
2 goals
11%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
41%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
4%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. SogdianaGoalLjupche Doriev
  2. QizilqumSubstitutionOn: Ruslan RoziyevOff: Luka Ratkovic
  3. SogdianaYellow cardNodirjon Soyibov
  4. SogdianaYellow cardSamandarjon Mavlonqulov
  5. SogdianaGoalDženan Zajmović

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Sogdiana's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Qizilqum. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.

Qizilqum
1 : 3
Sogdiana
FK Sogdiana Jizak
3 : 0
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
Qizilqum Zarafshon PFK
0 : 0
FK Sogdiana Jizak

FAQ

What was the result of Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?

The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Sogdiana 2:1 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Sogdiana and Qizilqum?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sogdiana won 2, Qizilqum won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?

Sogdiana score 1.76 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.88. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Sogdiana's matches and 29% of Qizilqum's.

What form are Sogdiana and Qizilqum in?

Over the last 5 games Sogdiana have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.