Sogdiana vs Qizilqum: match statistics
Sogdiana vs Qizilqum: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sogdiana played against Qizilqum in Uzbekistan Super League (Uzbekistan). The game was played on August 18, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Sogdiana has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Qizilqum has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Sogdiana scores 1.76 goals per game and allows 2.06. Qizilqum scores 0.88 and allows 1.41. Games in this league average 2.66 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 76% of Sogdiana's games and 29% of Qizilqum's. The Over 2.5 rates are 76% and 41%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sogdiana has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.15 per game. Sogdiana takes 12.0 shots per game, while Qizilqum takes 9.2.
First-half and second-half trends
Sogdiana leads at halftime in 41% of its games and scores 1.00 goals per game after halftime. Qizilqum leads at halftime in 24% and scores 0.29 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sogdiana's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (6 goals). For Qizilqum, it is minutes 0-15 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Uzbekistan Super League games average 2.66 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sogdiana have a clear edge in recent form: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches and averaged 1.8 points per game, while Qizilqum managed just 0.8 points per match. The hosts average 1.88 goals at home, whereas the visitors score only 0.50 away from home and have failed to find the net in as many as 63% of such matches. The difference in chance creation is reflected in Sogdiana’s average of 5.5 shots on target compared with Qizilqum’s 2.75, as well as the hosts’ xG of 1.52 versus 1.11 for the visitors. Sogdiana do concede 2.25 goals per home game, but Qizilqum’s poor away attacking output and 63% away-loss rate point towards a home win. Qizilqum may exploit their opponents’ defensive issues, but the more likely scenario is that Sogdiana will create more chances and claim all three points.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The strongest argument for BTTS - No is Qizilqum’s very low scoring efficiency throughout the season: the visitors average just 0.50 goals and failed to score in 63% of their matches. Their season BTTS rate is only 13%, clearly below Sogdiana’s 50% and the league average of 54%. The last five matches provide slightly more support for a Goal/Goal outcome, as Sogdiana scored 1.8 goals, while both teams conceded 2.0 and 1.8 goals per match respectively. Nevertheless, Qizilqum scored only 1.0 goal in this run, recording an xG of 1.01, while the hosts kept a clean sheet in 25% of their matches. Sogdiana should have good conditions to score, with opponents’ xG against them standing at 1.57, but the greater risk concerns the visitors finding the net. Therefore, the more likely scenario is that at least one team fails to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Sogdiana have averaged 1.8 goals scored and 2.0 conceded over their last five matches, while Qizilqum have scored 1.0 and allowed 1.8 goals, lifting the projection to around 2.45 goals. However, the hosts possess greater attacking potential: their average xG stands at 1.21, compared with Qizilqum’s 1.11, although the visitors have scored just 0.50 goals per game throughout the season. The 3.5 line remains high, as only 25% of Sogdiana’s matches and 13% of Qizilqum’s games went over four goals. In addition, Qizilqum failed to score in 63% of their matches, while both teams kept a clean sheet in 25% of games, limiting the risk of a very high-scoring outcome. The strongest selection is therefore Under 3.5 goals, as the season data and expected goal tally clearly support a result with a maximum of three goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sogdiana win at full-time, as Qizilqum were level at the break in 63% of their matches, including 50% of their last five. Both teams have limited attacking output before the break: Sogdiana average 0.43 goals, while Qizilqum average just 0.25, and the visitors have failed to lead at half-time in any of their last five appearances. After the interval, the advantage should shift to the hosts, who have averaged 1.4 goals in their last five matches, compared with just 0.25 for Qizilqum. Sogdiana have won 60% of their last five games and average 1.8 points per match over this period, compared with Qizilqum’s 20% win rate and 0.8 points per match. In addition, the hosts create slightly better scoring opportunities, with an average xG of 1.21 compared with their opponents’ 1.11, while the visitors’ defense allows an average xG of 1.57.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sogdiana | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 43% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.13 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.34 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sogdiana is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Sogdiana · 1.4 pts / game - Qizilqum
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sogdiana is 100% better for: goals scored per game.
1.76 goals / game - Sogdiana · 0.88 goals / game - Qizilqum
Qizilqum is 46% better for: goals allowed per game.
2.06 goals / game - Sogdiana · 1.41 goals / game - Qizilqum
Sogdiana scores in 88% of games (15 of 17 meczów), while Qizilqum keeps a clean sheet in 29% (5 of 17 meczów).
Qizilqum scores in 53% of games (9 of 17 meczów), while Sogdiana keeps a clean sheet in 12% (2 of 17 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sogdiana
Over / Under - Qizilqum
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sogdiana is 37% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.53 pts / game - Sogdiana · 1.12 pts / game - Qizilqum
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sogdiana - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 41% of games and wins 35%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Qizilqum - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 24% of games and wins 35%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 100% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (6 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sogdiana
Qizilqum
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Uzbekistan Super League).
Teams vs league
| Sogdiana | Liga | Qizilqum | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 3.82 | 2.66 | ▼ 2.29 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 76% | 55% | ▼ 29% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 76% | 54% | ▼ 41% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 12% | 26% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 76% | 68% | ▼ 65% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 94% | 76% | ▼ 65% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sogdiana's perspective: 2 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Qizilqum. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?
The Uzbekistan Super League match finished Sogdiana 2:1 Qizilqum. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sogdiana and Qizilqum?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Sogdiana won 2, Qizilqum won 0 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?
Sogdiana score 1.76 goals per game on average and Qizilqum 0.88. The Uzbekistan Super League average is 2.66 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 76% of Sogdiana's matches and 29% of Qizilqum's.
What form are Sogdiana and Qizilqum in?
Over the last 5 games Sogdiana have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Qizilqum 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sogdiana vs Qizilqum?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


