England - EFL League OneEdgeley ParkData current as of November 03, 2026

Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: match statistics

Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Stockport County played against AFC Wimbledon in EFL League One (England). The game was played on October 31, 2026. Venue: Edgeley Park. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Stockport County has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. AFC Wimbledon has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Stockport County scores 1.85 goals per game and allows 1.00. AFC Wimbledon scores 0.67 and allows 1.58. Games in this league average 2.79 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 46% of Stockport County's games and 33% of AFC Wimbledon's. The Over 2.5 rates are 46% and 42%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Stockport County has the higher season xG average, 1.84 to 1.22 per game. Stockport County takes 17.1 shots per game, while AFC Wimbledon takes 11.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Stockport County leads at halftime in 31% of its games and scores 1.15 goals per game after halftime. AFC Wimbledon leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.17 after halftime.

When the teams score

Stockport County's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (7 goals). For AFC Wimbledon, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

League One games average 2.79 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Stockport County sit 2nd and have won 4 of their last 5 matches, while 16th-placed AFC Wimbledon have failed to win during that span. The hosts scored 9 goals and conceded just 2 in those games, whereas the visitors scored 2 and conceded 11, highlighting a clear difference in the teams’ current form. Stockport average 2.33 goals per match at home, while Wimbledon concede 2.5 on the road; moreover, the hosts have won 67% of their home matches, and the visitors have lost 67% of their away games. Stockport’s superior chance quality is reflected in their average home xG of 2.07, compared with Wimbledon’s away xG of 1.23, making a home win the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The strongest case for BTTS - No is Stockport’s defensive record: they keep a clean sheet in 67% of home matches and concede an average of 0.67 goals. AFC Wimbledon score an average of 0.83 goals away from home and have managed just 2 goals across their last 5 matches, limiting the visitors’ chances of finding the net. The hosts, meanwhile, have a good opportunity to score, as Wimbledon concede an average of 2.5 goals away from home and have let in 11 in their last 5 matches. Although Stockport score just 0.5 goals per home match on average, their tally of 9 goals in their last 5 games strengthens this scenario. BTTS - Yes has landed in only 17% of Stockport’s home matches, compared with 50% of Wimbledon’s away matches, so it is more likely that at least one team will fail to score.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Stockport kept a clean sheet in 67% of their home matches, while Wimbledon averaged just 0.83 goals away from home, limiting the visitors’ chances of pushing the total higher. On the other hand, Wimbledon conceded an average of 2.5 goals on the road, and Stockport scored 9 goals in their last 5 matches, giving the hosts a clear chance to find the net. Despite this attacking advantage, none of Stockport’s home matches produced more than 3 goals, while that threshold was exceeded in just 33% of Wimbledon’s away matches. Therefore, Under 3.5 goals is the strongest pick: it allows for a home win with 2 or 3 goals without requiring an equally effective response from the visitors.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

The most likely outcome is a draw at half-time followed by a Stockport County win at full-time. The hosts were level at the break in 50% of the matches covered by the data, and scored just 0.2 goals per match before half-time across their last five games, which argues against them taking an early lead. Their recent form after the break has been much stronger: they averaged 1.6 goals, while AFC Wimbledon scored none and conceded an average of 1.0. Stockport have won four of their last five matches, while Wimbledon have won none, so a half-time draw is more likely to turn into a home win than to hold through to full-time. Confidence in the pick is tempered by the fact that Wimbledon were trailing at half-time in 50% of the matches covered, making a home lead at the break a significant alternative.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
2 : 1
Second half

Game stats

70Possession (%)30
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
18Shots10
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
3Shots on target5
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.74xG1.16
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
10Corners4
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
55Dangerous attacks25
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
3Fouls9
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1Cards1
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.85Goals scored / game0.67
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1Goals allowed / game1.58
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
62%Average possession45%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
5.08Shots on target / game2.5
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

17.08Shots per game11.08
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
5.08Shots on target2.5
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
10.8%Shot conversion6%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
62%Possession45%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.84xG for1.22
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.04xG against1.67
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Shooting quality

Stockport County: DominantAFC Wimbledon: Balanced
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
Accuracy (shots on target)30%23%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Stockport County is 400% better for: last-5 form.

2 pts / game - Stockport County · 0.4 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon

Stockport County
WWWDL
Season result split
54% W15% D31% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-2-4
1.77 pts / game · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-1-1
2.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-0-2
Last 5 at home
4-0-1
WLWWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.92Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%
AFC Wimbledon
DLLLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
25% W33% D42% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-4-5
1.08 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-1-4
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWDLL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.17Opponent xG: 2.04BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Stockport County is 176% better for: goals scored per game.

1.85 goals / game - Stockport County · 0.67 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon

Stockport County is 58% better for: goals allowed per game.

1 goals / game - Stockport County · 1.58 goals / game - AFC Wimbledon

Stockport County scoring profile: strong

Stockport County scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 games), while AFC Wimbledon keeps a clean sheet in 42% (5 of 12 games).

AFC Wimbledon scoring profile: mixed

AFC Wimbledon scores in 58% of games (7 of 12 games), while Stockport County keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 games).

24Goals scored (season)8
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
13Goals conceded (season)19
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
2.85Average goals per game2.25
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
7Goals scored (last 5)3
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
3Goals conceded (last 5)12
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal58%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
46%2 goals8%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
38%3 goals0%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
15%4 goals0%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

How often they concede at least...

62%1 goal58%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
23%2 goals42%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
8%3 goals33%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
8%4 goals17%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

15%BTTS at half-time17%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
8%BTTS in both halves0%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
31%Scored in both halves8%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

BTTS and goal count

38%Min. 3 goals and BTTS17%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
8%Min. 3 goals without BTTS25%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
40%BTTS - last 560%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

69%Min. 1 goal before half-time75%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time42%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

2nd half

77%Min. 1 goal after half-time75%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
46%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
23%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

AFC Wimbledon is 8% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.23 pts / game - Stockport County · 1.33 pts / game - AFC Wimbledon

Stockport County - half-time state
31% leading31% draw38% trailing
AFC Wimbledon - half-time state
33% leading33% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.23Points per game (1st half)1.33
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
0.69Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
0.62Goals conceded (1st half)0.83
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.31Average goals (1st half)1.33
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
54%Clean sheet before half-time58%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
62%No goal before half-time50%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

After half-time (2nd half)

2Points per game (2nd half)0.75
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.15Goals scored (2nd half)0.17
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
0.38Goals conceded (2nd half)0.75
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
1.54Average goals (2nd half)0.92
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
77%Clean sheet after half-time42%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon
31%No goal after half-time83%
Stockport CountyAFC Wimbledon

Stockport County - second-half results

54% W38% D8% L
16
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
+1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+10
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.23
PPG before half-time
Lead holding174%

Leads at halftime in 31% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

AFC Wimbledon - second-half results

17% W25% D58% L
16
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.33
PPG before half-time
Lead holding76%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 25%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Stockport County - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.802.20
Goals scored / game0.21.2
Goals allowed / game0.60.0
Average goals per game0.81.2
1 goal80%60%
2 goals0%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%100%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+6
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1
AFC Wimbledon - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.400.00
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game1.21.2
Average goals per game1.81.2
1 goal100%100%
2 goals60%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%0%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-3-6
Half-time: 40% leading - 20% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 0% draw - 100% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Stockport County
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
7
2
16-30
0
3
31-45
6
3
46-60
4
0
61-75
5
2
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (7 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

AFC Wimbledon
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
4
5
16-30
1
4
31-45
0
3
46-60
1
1
61-75
1
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.55
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 0.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
91%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
40%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-2%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
45%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
10%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 10 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Stockport County

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.80
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.05
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-7.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.01
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.04
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
123%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
78%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.23
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
21% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
21%

AFC Wimbledon

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.45
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.46
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+7.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.55
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
52%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
105%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.68
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.3
Late goals
13% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
13%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (League One).

Teams vs league

Stockport CountyLigaAFC Wimbledon
Average goals per game• 2.852.79▼ 2.25
Both teams scored▼ 46%57%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 46%54%▼ 42%
Clean sheets▲ 38%26%▲ 42%
Goal before half-time• 69%68%▲ 75%
Goal after half-time▼ 77%84%▼ 75%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.79
Average goals per game
57%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
26%
Clean sheets
1.51
Home goals / game
1.28
Away goals / game
+18%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+13%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
68%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
12%
3 goals
1%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
49%
2 goals
23%
3 goals
10%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. AFC WimbledonGoalJayden StockleyAssist: Harry Cornick
  2. Stockport CountyYellow cardEoghan O'Connell
  3. Stockport CountyGoalJack DiamondAssist: Mikaël Yann Mathieu Mandron
  4. Stockport CountySubstitutionOn: Harry WoodOff: Benoný Breki Andrésson
  5. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Isaac OgundereOff: Harry Cornick
  6. Stockport CountyGoalEthan Ennis
  7. AFC WimbledonYellow cardJayden Stockley
  8. AFC WimbledonSubstitutionOn: Harry HedgesOff: Alistair Smith

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Stockport County's perspective: 2 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses against AFC Wimbledon. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.

AFC Wimbledon
0 : 2
Stockport County FC
Stockport County FC
3 : 0
AFC Wimbledon

FAQ

What was the result of Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

The EFL League One match finished Stockport County 2:1 AFC Wimbledon. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Stockport County won 2, AFC Wimbledon won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

Stockport County score 1.85 goals per game on average and AFC Wimbledon 0.67. The EFL League One average is 2.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 46% of Stockport County's matches and 33% of AFC Wimbledon's.

What form are Stockport County and AFC Wimbledon in?

Over the last 5 games Stockport County have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and AFC Wimbledon 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon?

The statistical background for Stockport County vs AFC Wimbledon — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.