Sūduva vs Hegelmann Litauen: match statistics
Sūduva presents a solid home form with a 50% win rate and an impressive 100% clean sheet record at home, yet to concede a goal at their own stadium this season. Hegelmann Litauen has not won a single away match this season, recording only draws (100% Draw%), which indicates a defensive approach and difficulties in securing maximum points on the road. The hosts have an advantage in shot conversion (11% vs 6%) and a better home goal difference (+2 vs 0 for the visitors away). The xG statistics show a slight edge for Hegelmann (1.65 vs 1.12), but their inability to win away matches and Sūduva's defensive solidity at home speak in favor of the hosts. I expect a tight encounter with an advantage for the home team, although a draw remains a realistic scenario given the visitors' tendency to share points.
Sūduva vs Hegelmann Litauen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sūduva played against Hegelmann Litauen in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on March 14, 2026. Final score: 0:0.
Recent form
Sūduva has 1 win, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.25 points per game. Hegelmann Litauen has 0 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss, with 0.75 points per game.
Scoring records
Sūduva scores 0.50 goals per game and allows 0.25. Hegelmann Litauen scores 0.75 and allows 1.25. Games in this league average 2.45 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 0% of Sūduva's games and 75% of Hegelmann Litauen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 0% and 0%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 40% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Hegelmann Litauen has the higher season xG average, 1.27 to 1.21 per game. Sūduva takes 11.0 shots per game, while Hegelmann Litauen takes 11.5.
First-half and second-half trends
Sūduva leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.25 goals per game after halftime. Hegelmann Litauen leads at halftime in 50% and scores 0.25 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sūduva's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (1 goals). For Hegelmann Litauen, it is minutes 16-30 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.45 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 40% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 4 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sūduva presents a solid home form with a 50% win rate and an impressive 100% clean sheet record at home, yet to concede a goal at their own stadium this season. Hegelmann Litauen has not won a single away match this season, recording only draws (100% Draw%), which indicates a defensive approach and difficulties in securing maximum points on the road. The hosts have an advantage in shot conversion (11% vs 6%) and a better home goal difference (+2 vs 0 for the visitors away). The xG statistics show a slight edge for Hegelmann (1.65 vs 1.12), but their inability to win away matches and Sūduva's defensive solidity at home speak in favor of the hosts. I expect a tight encounter with an advantage for the home team, although a draw remains a realistic scenario given the visitors' tendency to share points.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sūduva | Hegelmann Litauen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 27% | 26% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.17 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sūduva is 67% better for: last-5 form.
1.25 pts / game - Sūduva · 0.75 pts / game - Hegelmann Litauen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Hegelmann Litauen is 50% better for: goals scored per game.
0.5 goals / game - Sūduva · 0.75 goals / game - Hegelmann Litauen
Sūduva is 400% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.25 goals / game - Sūduva · 1.25 goals / game - Hegelmann Litauen
Sūduva scores in 25% of games (1 of 4 meczów), while Hegelmann Litauen keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 4 meczów).
Hegelmann Litauen scores in 75% of games (3 of 4 meczów), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 75% (3 of 4 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sūduva
Over / Under - Hegelmann Litauen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Hegelmann Litauen is 40% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Sūduva · 1.75 pts / game - Hegelmann Litauen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Hegelmann Litauen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 0%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.8 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.25 | 1.50 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| 1 goal | 50% | 25% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 100% |
| No goal | 75% | 75% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.75 | 0.75 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.5 | 0.3 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 75% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 25% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 75% | 25% |
| No goal | 50% | 75% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -3 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (1 goal). Concedes most in 16-30 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (1 goal). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sūduva
Hegelmann Litauen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Sūduva | Liga | Hegelmann Litauen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 0.75 | 2.45 | ▼ 2.00 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▲ 75% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 0% | 40% | ▼ 0% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 75% | 35% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 50% | 75% | • 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 25% | 75% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sūduva's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Hegelmann Litauen. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sūduva vs Hegelmann Litauen?
The A Lyga match finished Sūduva 0:0 Hegelmann Litauen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sūduva and Hegelmann Litauen?
In the last 4 head-to-head matches Sūduva won 3, Hegelmann Litauen won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sūduva vs Hegelmann Litauen?
Sūduva score 0.50 goals per game on average and Hegelmann Litauen 0.75. The A Lyga average is 2.45 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 40% of games. Both teams score in 0% of Sūduva's matches and 75% of Hegelmann Litauen's.
What form are Sūduva and Hegelmann Litauen in?
Over the last 5 games Sūduva have a 1-2-1 record (1.25 points per game) and Hegelmann Litauen 0-3-1 (0.75 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sūduva vs Hegelmann Litauen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.