Sūduva vs Panevėžys: match statistics
Sūduva vs Panevėžys: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Sūduva played against Panevėžys in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on August 23, 2026. Venue: Marijampoles sporto centro stadione. Final score: 2:0.
Recent form
Sūduva has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Panevėžys has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Sūduva scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 0.71. Panevėžys scores 0.96 and allows 1.67. Games in this league average 2.65 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Sūduva's games and 54% of Panevėžys's. The Over 2.5 rates are 50% and 54%, compared with league averages of 50% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sūduva has the higher season xG average, 1.51 to 1.25 per game. Sūduva takes 12.4 shots per game, while Panevėžys takes 10.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Sūduva leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.96 goals per game after halftime. Panevėžys leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
Sūduva's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (12 goals). For Panevėžys, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.65 goals. Both teams score in 50% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 7 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 3 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.57 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sūduva are top of the table and have collected 13 points from their last five matches, winning 4 times while conceding just 2 goals. At home, the hosts average 1.75 goals scored and only 0.50 conceded, while also keeping a clean sheet in 58% of their matches. Panevėžys score just 0.75 goals per away game, fail to find the net in 50% of their outings and lose 75% of their matches, conceding an average of 2.25 goals. Sūduva’s advantage is further supported by the quality of chances created: their home xG stands at 1.47, while the visitors allow 1.67 xG away from home. Panevėžys’ recent form has been more stable defensively, having conceded 4 goals in five matches, but just one win and 5 goals scored during that period still point to a clear advantage for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
A no-goal scenario for both teams is more likely primarily due to Panevėžys’ limited attacking potential: the visitors average only 0.75 goals per match and have failed to score in 50% of their games this season. Sūduva are also in very good defensive form, conceding just 2 goals in their last 5 matches—an average of 0.4 per game—while allowing opponents an average xG of 0.94. The hosts should nevertheless have good chances to score, as Panevėžys concede an average of 2.25 goals and have allowed opponents an average xG of 1.74 across their last five appearances. Although Sūduva recorded BTTS in 75% of their matches this season, the recent results of both teams, together with Panevėžys’ 33% BTTS rate, provide stronger support for the BTTS - No option, meaning that at least one team will fail to score.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Sūduva are in excellent form, averaging 2.4 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded over their last 5 matches, while Panevėžys have allowed opponents only 0.8 goals per game during the same period. The hosts have the offensive edge, creating an average of 1.36 xG, while the visitors have conceded 2.25 goals per match throughout the season, leading to a projected total of around 1.67 goals for Sūduva. However, Panevėžys’ attacking potential is limited: they average 0.75 goals, have failed to score in 50% of their league matches, and Sūduva’s recently outstanding defense lowers the visitors’ projection to 0.81 goals. The 3.5 line is strongly supported by the data, as 92% of Sūduva’s matches and 58% of Panevėžys’ games finished below it, while the combined projection of 2.48 goals remains clearly below the four goals required for Over 3.5.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Sūduva have a clear edge in current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring an average of 2.4 goals and conceding just 0.4, while Panevėžys have won only 1 of their last 5 games. The hosts regularly start their matches strongly, leading at the break in 50% of cases, while the visitors have gone into half-time trailing in as many as 58% of their away games; additionally, Panevėžys concede an average of 1.25 goals before the break. Sūduva’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created: their average xG is 1.36 compared with 1.15 for their opponents, while opponents concede as many as 2.25 goals per away match. After the break, the hosts have been particularly effective recently, scoring an average of 1.4 goals while conceding just 0.2, whereas Panevėžys score only 0.2 goals in this half. The most likely scenario is therefore for Sūduva to take the lead before half-time and maintain it until the final whistle.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Sūduva | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 35% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sūduva is 160% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Sūduva · 1 pts / game - Panevėžys
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sūduva is 70% better for: goals scored per game.
1.63 goals / game - Sūduva · 0.96 goals / game - Panevėžys
Sūduva is 135% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.71 goals / game - Sūduva · 1.67 goals / game - Panevėžys
Sūduva scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 meczów), while Panevėžys keeps a clean sheet in 17% (4 of 24 meczów).
Panevėžys scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 meczów), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 46% (11 of 24 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Sūduva
Over / Under - Panevėžys
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Sūduva is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.54 pts / game - Sūduva · 1.33 pts / game - Panevėžys
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Panevėžys - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 29%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +4 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +8 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Sūduva
Panevėžys
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| Sūduva | Liga | Panevėžys | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.33 | 2.65 | • 2.63 |
| Both teams scored | • 50% | 50% | ▲ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 50% | 53% | • 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 46% | 31% | ▼ 17% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 71% | ▲ 83% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 71% | 77% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Sūduva's perspective: 3 wins, 3 draws and 1 loss against Panevėžys. Games average 1.57 goals, and both teams scored in 43% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Sūduva vs Panevėžys?
The A Lyga match finished Sūduva 2:0 Panevėžys. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Sūduva and Panevėžys?
In the last 7 head-to-head matches Sūduva won 3, Panevėžys won 1 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 1.57 goals, with both teams scoring in 43% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Sūduva vs Panevėžys?
Sūduva score 1.63 goals per game on average and Panevėžys 0.96. The A Lyga average is 2.65 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Sūduva's matches and 54% of Panevėžys's.
What form are Sūduva and Panevėžys in?
Over the last 5 games Sūduva have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Panevėžys 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Sūduva vs Panevėžys?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.