Latvia - VirsligaData current as of 16 July 2026

Super Nova vs Auda: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Auda crest
Auda

Super Nova vs Auda: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Super Nova play Auda in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 1 May 2026 at 17:00. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Super Nova: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match. Auda: 1-2-2, 1.00 points/match.

Goal statistics

Super Nova scores 1.05 and concedes 1.59 goals per match. Auda scores 1.68 and concedes 1.18. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Super Nova 64%, Auda 59%. Over 2.5: Super Nova 59%, Auda 55%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Auda has higher xG: 1.63 vs 1.15. Super Nova: 8.6 shots per match, Auda: 13.2.

Match halves

Super Nova: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.45. Auda: half-time lead 36%, second-half goals 0.91.

Goals by minute

Super Nova: 76-90+ (6 goals). Auda: 31-45+ (9 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 0-1-5. Average goals 2.33, BTTS 50%.

Match description

Auda are the favorites: this season they have a record of 6 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses and sit 3rd, while Super Nova have 4 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses and are 5th. In their last 5 matches Auda have scored 10 goals and average 2.0 points per game (3 wins, 1 draw, 1 loss), whereas Super Nova have scored 4 goals and average 1.2 points per game (2 wins, 0 draws, 3 losses). In chance creation Auda average 13.6 shots and 4.8 on target per match, have a conversion rate of 13% and xG 1.57, while Super Nova record 9.33 shots and 3.0 on target, conversion 11% and xG 1.16, giving the visitors a clear quantitative and qualitative advantage. Defensively Auda concede 0.8 goals away with xG against 0.97 and keep clean sheets in 40% of matches, whereas Super Nova concede 2.33 goals at home with xG against 1.85 and have no clean sheets (0%), indicating the hosts’ defensive frailties. Considering superior possession (55% vs 41%), a higher goals-per-game average (1.8 vs 1.0) and a more favorable shots and xG profile, I tip an Auda win and estimate probabilities of Auda win 70%, draw 20% and Super Nova win 10%.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

31Possession (%)69
Super NovaAuda
5Shots15
Super NovaAuda
2Shots on target5
Super NovaAuda
0.78xG1.9
Super NovaAuda
3Corners14
Super NovaAuda
44Dangerous attacks85
Super NovaAuda
16Fouls21
Super NovaAuda
3Cards2
Super NovaAuda

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.05Goals scored / match1.68
Super NovaAuda
1.59Goals conceded / match1.18
Super NovaAuda
45%Average possession60%
Super NovaAuda
3.45Shots on target / match4.68
Super NovaAuda

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.64Shots per match13.23
Super NovaAuda
3.45Shots on target4.68
Super NovaAuda
12.1%Shot conversion12.7%
Super NovaAuda
45%Possession60%
Super NovaAuda
1.15xG for1.63
Super NovaAuda
1.68xG against1.13
Super NovaAuda

Shooting quality

Super Nova: Counter-attackingAuda: Balanced
Super NovaAuda
Accuracy (shots on target)40%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.36

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Auda is 25% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / match - Super Nova · 1 pts / match - Auda

Super Nova
DLLWL
Season result split
32% W14% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-2-7
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
WLLLL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%
Auda
LWDLD
Season result split
55% W18% R27% P
Season (W-D-L)
12-4-6
1.82 pts / match · goal difference +11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
7-3-2
Last 5 away
2-2-1
WLWDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.94BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Auda is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.05 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.68 goals / match - Auda

Auda is 35% better for: goals conceded per match.

1.59 goals / match - Super Nova · 1.18 goals / match - Auda

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Auda keeps a clean sheet in 32% (7 of 22 matches).

Auda scoring profile: very strong

Auda scores in 86% of matches (19 of 22 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

23Goals scored (season)37
Super NovaAuda
35Goals conceded (season)26
Super NovaAuda
2.64Average goals in match2.86
Super NovaAuda
4Goals scored (last 5)4
Super NovaAuda
10Goals conceded (last 5)5
Super NovaAuda

How often they score at least...

77%1 goal86%
Super NovaAuda
23%2 goals50%
Super NovaAuda
5%3 goals14%
Super NovaAuda
0%4 goals5%
Super NovaAuda

How often they concede at least...

82%1 goal68%
Super NovaAuda
50%2 goals32%
Super NovaAuda
14%3 goals14%
Super NovaAuda
9%4 goals5%
Super NovaAuda

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

32%BTTS at half-time27%
Super NovaAuda
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Super NovaAuda
9%Scored in both halves36%
Super NovaAuda

BTTS and goal count

55%Min. 3 goals and BTTS45%
Super NovaAuda
5%Min. 3 goals without BTTS9%
Super NovaAuda
60%BTTS - last 540%
Super NovaAuda

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

64%Min. 1 goal before half-time77%
Super NovaAuda
50%Min. 2 goals before half-time45%
Super NovaAuda
23%Min. 3 goals before half-time18%
Super NovaAuda

2nd half

86%Min. 1 goal after half-time82%
Super NovaAuda
27%Min. 2 goals after half-time45%
Super NovaAuda
5%Min. 3 goals after half-time9%
Super NovaAuda

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Auda is 38% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.05 pts / match - Super Nova · 1.45 pts / match - Auda

Super Nova - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing
Auda - half-time state
36% leading36% draw27% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per match (1st half)1.45
Super NovaAuda
0.59Goals scored (1st half)0.77
Super NovaAuda
0.86Goals conceded (1st half)0.64
Super NovaAuda
1.45Average goals (1st half)1.41
Super NovaAuda
50%Clean sheet before half-time55%
Super NovaAuda
55%No goal before half-time41%
Super NovaAuda

After half-time (2nd half)

1.14Points per match (2nd half)1.55
Super NovaAuda
0.45Goals scored (2nd half)0.91
Super NovaAuda
0.73Goals conceded (2nd half)0.55
Super NovaAuda
1.18Average goals (2nd half)1.45
Super NovaAuda
45%Clean sheet after half-time55%
Super NovaAuda
59%No goal after half-time36%
Super NovaAuda

Super Nova - second-half results

32% W18% R50% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Auda - second-half results

36% W45% R18% P
32
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
34
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.45
PPG before half-time
Lead holding153%

Leads at half-time in 36% of matches and wins 55%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2
Auda - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.801.20
Goals scored / match0.20.6
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals40%40%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-2+1
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 60% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
3
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

Auda
ScoredConceded
3
3
0-15
5
5
16-30
9
6
31-45
9
4
46-60
5
3
61-75
6
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (9 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

2.75
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.1 : 1.6
Estimated goal split
home : away
92%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
62%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-15%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
66%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
3%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 33 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Auda

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.50
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
0.00
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.05
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.05
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
70%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.82
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
16% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 8% come in the first quarter-hour.
16%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaAuda
Average goals in match 2.642.99 2.86
Both teams scored 64%57% 59%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 59%55% 55%
Clean sheets 18%23% 32%
Goal before half-time 64%75% 77%
Goal after half-time 86%85% 82%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Super Nova 0 - 1 - 5 Auda. Average goals 2.33, both teams scored in 50% matches.

SK Super Nova
0 : 2
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
FK Auda Riga
3 : 2
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
0 : 1
FK Auda Riga
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FK Auda Riga
FK Auda Riga
1 : 0
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs Auda?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 1:2 Auda. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and Auda?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 0, Auda won 5 and 1 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs Auda?

Super Nova score 1.05 goals per game on average and Auda 1.68. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Super Nova's matches and 59% of Auda's.

What form are Super Nova and Auda in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Auda 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs Auda?

The statistical background for Super Nova vs Auda — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.