Latvia - VirsligaOlaines stadionsData current as of August 30, 2026

Super Nova vs BFC Daugavpils: match statistics

Super Nova crest
Super Nova
0 : 0half-time 0:0
BFC Daugavpils crest
BFC Daugavpils

Super Nova vs BFC Daugavpils: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Super Nova played against BFC Daugavpils in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on August 22, 2026. Venue: Olaines stadions. Final score: 0:0.

Recent form

Super Nova has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. BFC Daugavpils has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss, with 2.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Super Nova scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 1.54. BFC Daugavpils scores 1.27 and allows 1.19. Games in this league average 2.99 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 63% of Super Nova's games and 54% of BFC Daugavpils's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 42%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 56% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

BFC Daugavpils has the higher season xG average, 1.57 to 1.21 per game. Super Nova takes 9.3 shots per game, while BFC Daugavpils takes 13.0.

First-half and second-half trends

Super Nova leads at halftime in 21% of its games and scores 0.50 goals per game after halftime. BFC Daugavpils leads at halftime in 27% and scores 0.88 after halftime.

When the teams score

Super Nova's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For BFC Daugavpils, it is minutes 46-60 (14 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.99 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 56% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 2 home wins, 4 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

BFC Daugavpils head into this fixture in clearly better form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, scoring 11 goals and conceding just 3, while Super Nova have suffered 3 defeats and scored 6 goals. The visitors are also higher in the table, sitting 4th compared with the hosts in 6th, and have a superior season goal difference overall: 33 goals scored and 31 conceded, compared with Super Nova’s 26:37. Away from home, Daugavpils create more chances, averaging 12.27 shots and 4.55 shots on target per match, compared with their opponents’ 9.67 and 3.92 at home. The hosts concede as many as 2.00 goals per home match, with an xG against of 1.90, which should favor the visitors’ attack, whose average away xG stands at 1.48. Daugavpils’ weaker away record, including 36% draws, leaves some risk of the points being shared, but current form points to an away win.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The signal for both teams to score is moderately positive, as BFC Daugavpils have recorded BTTS in 82% of their matches and have averaged 2.2 goals across their last five games. Super Nova should have good conditions to find the net: their average xG stands at 1.63, while their opponents concede 1.68 xG and allow an average of 1.82 goals over the course of the season. The visitors also create chances worth 1.48 xG, almost identical to the 1.51 xG conceded by Super Nova. The risk to the pick is the hosts’ solid defense, with just 0.73 goals conceded per game this season and clean sheets kept in 40% of matches. However, Daugavpils’ high attacking efficiency in their recent run marginally tilts the prediction towards BTTS - Yes.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

A projection of 2.54 goals points to a match with a realistic chance of 2–3 goals, but without strong grounds for exceeding four goals. Super Nova had fewer than 3.5 goals in 80% of its matches throughout the season, while its defense concedes just 0.73 goals per game on average and keeps a clean sheet in 40% of its appearances. BFC Daugavpils poses an attacking threat, scoring 1.45 goals on average and netting 11 goals in its last five matches, but has conceded only 3 goals over the same period. The xG figures—1.63 for the hosts and 1.48 for the visitors—support a goalscoring scenario, but do not suggest an open, four-goal game. Therefore, Under 3.5 has the highest probability, especially as only 20% of Super Nova’s matches and 45% of Daugavpils’ games finished above this line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

BFC Daugavpils are clearly stronger in terms of current form: they have won 4 of their last 5 matches, averaging 2.2 goals scored and just 0.6 conceded, while Super Nova have lost 3 of their last 5 games. The visitors have started their recent matches well, leading at the break in 40% of them and scoring an average of 0.6 goals before half-time; during this period, the hosts have managed only 0.2 first-half goals per match. Seasonal data does point to a cautious start, with the hosts drawing at half-time in 53% of their matches, but Daugavpils currently have a clearly better rhythm. After the break, the visitors have averaged 1.6 goals across their last five appearances and conceded just 0.2 goals, which strengthens the case for them to maintain their lead. The 2/2 HT/FT outcome is therefore marginally the strongest option, although the high probability of a draw at half-time remains the main risk to this scenario.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

46Possession (%)54
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
6Shots16
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0Shots on target4
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0.61xG1.72
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
3Corners3
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
31Dangerous attacks59
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
12Fouls17
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
2Cards2
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
1.08Goals scored / game1.27
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
1.54Goals allowed / game1.19
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
46%Average possession48%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
3.71Shots on target / game4.77
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.29Shots per game13
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
3.71Shots on target4.77
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
11.7%Shot conversion9.8%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
46%Possession48%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
1.21xG for1.57
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
1.69xG against1.58
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

Shooting quality

Super Nova: BalancedBFC Daugavpils: Balanced
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
Accuracy (shots on target)40%37%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.130.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

BFC Daugavpils is 100% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Super Nova · 2.4 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Super Nova
LWLWL
Season result split
33% W13% R54% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-3-13
1.13 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-2-8
Last 5 at home
1-0-4
LLLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.58Opponent xG: 1.80BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
BFC Daugavpils
WWLWW
Season result split
38% W23% R38% P
Season (W-D-L)
10-6-10
1.38 pts / game · goal difference +2
Last 5 (W-D-L)
4-0-1
2.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-5
Last 5 away
1-2-2
DDLWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 2.2Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 1.75Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

BFC Daugavpils is 18% better for: goals scored per game.

1.08 goals / game - Super Nova · 1.27 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils

BFC Daugavpils is 29% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.54 goals / game - Super Nova · 1.19 goals / game - BFC Daugavpils

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 79% of games (19 of 24 meczów), while BFC Daugavpils keeps a clean sheet in 27% (7 of 26 meczów).

BFC Daugavpils scoring profile: very strong

BFC Daugavpils scores in 73% of games (19 of 26 meczów), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 meczów).

26Goals scored (season)33
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
37Goals conceded (season)31
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
2.63Average goals per game2.46
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
7Goals scored (last 5)11
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
10Goals conceded (last 5)3
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

How often they score at least...

79%1 goal73%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
25%2 goals35%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
4%3 goals15%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0%4 goals4%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal73%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
50%2 goals23%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
13%3 goals15%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
8%4 goals8%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

55%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time4%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
8%Scored in both halves23%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

BTTS and goal count

54%Min. 3 goals and BTTS38%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
4%Min. 3 goals without BTTS4%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
80%BTTS - last 540%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

63%Min. 1 goal before half-time54%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
46%Min. 2 goals before half-time15%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

2nd half

88%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time58%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
4%Min. 3 goals after half-time27%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

BFC Daugavpils is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.13 pts / game - Super Nova · 1.31 pts / game - BFC Daugavpils

Super Nova - half-time state
21% leading50% draw29% trailing
BFC Daugavpils - half-time state
27% leading50% draw23% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.13Points per game (1st half)1.31
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0.58Goals scored (1st half)0.38
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0.79Goals conceded (1st half)0.31
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
1.38Average goals (1st half)0.69
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
54%Clean sheet before half-time73%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
54%No goal before half-time69%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)1.19
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0.5Goals scored (2nd half)0.88
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
0.75Goals conceded (2nd half)0.88
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
1.25Average goals (2nd half)1.77
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
46%Clean sheet after half-time35%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils
58%No goal after half-time35%
Super NovaBFC Daugavpils

Super Nova - second-half results

33% W17% R50% P
27
Half-time points
14
Half-time goals
-5
Goal difference (1st half)
28
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.13
PPG before half-time
Lead holding157%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

BFC Daugavpils - second-half results

23% W50% R27% P
34
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
31
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.31
PPG before half-time
Lead holding141%

Leads at halftime in 27% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.6

Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Super Nova - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.20
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.81.2
Average goals per game1.42.0
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%80%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-1-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 0% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
BFC Daugavpils - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game2.002.20
Goals scored / game0.61.6
Goals allowed / game0.20.4
Average goals per game0.82.0
1 goal80%80%
2 goals0%80%
3 goals0%40%
Clean sheet80%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference+2+6
Half-time: 60% leading - 20% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
6
12
31-45
4
7
46-60
1
3
61-75
7
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

BFC Daugavpils
ScoredConceded
2
1
0-15
3
3
16-30
5
4
31-45
14
11
46-60
4
4
61-75
5
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (14 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.54
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.1 : 1.4
Estimated goal split
home : away
85%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
59%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-8%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
58%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
6%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 17 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.48
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.02
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.2 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.13
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.15
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
63%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
121%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.07
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 12% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

BFC Daugavpils

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.01
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.09
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-5.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.30
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.39
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
69%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+1.02
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.5
Late goals
15% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
15%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

Super NovaLigaBFC Daugavpils
Average goals per game 2.632.99 2.46
Both teams scored 63%55% 54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 58%56% 42%
Clean sheets 21%24% 27%
Goal before half-time 63%77% 54%
Goal after half-time 88%82% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per game
55%
Both teams scored
56%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.72
Home goals / game
1.27
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+8%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
48%
2 goals
18%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Agris GlaudansOff: Amadou Samaté
  2. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardŅikita Barkovskis
  3. Super NovaYellow cardEduards Emsis
  4. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Kristers SkadmanisOff: Eduards Emsis
  5. BFC DaugavpilsSubstitutionOn: Daniel KiwindaOff: Abdoul Kader Traore
  6. BFC DaugavpilsYellow cardCeti Junior Taty Tchibinda
  7. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Alens GrikovsOff: Raivis Ķiršs
  8. Super NovaYellow cardJegors Cīrulis

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Super Nova's perspective: 2 wins, 4 draws and 0 losses against BFC Daugavpils. Games average 2.33 goals, and both teams scored in 67% of them.

BFC Daugavpils
0 : 0
Super Nova
BFC Daugavpils
0 : 1
Super Nova
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
2 : 2
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
SK Super Nova
4 : 1
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
Bērnu futbola centrs Daugavpils
1 : 1
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Super Nova vs BFC Daugavpils?

The Virsliga match finished Super Nova 0:0 BFC Daugavpils. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Super Nova and BFC Daugavpils?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Super Nova won 2, BFC Daugavpils won 0 and 4 ended level. These games averaged 2.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 67% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Super Nova vs BFC Daugavpils?

Super Nova score 1.08 goals per game on average and BFC Daugavpils 1.27. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 56% of games. Both teams score in 63% of Super Nova's matches and 54% of BFC Daugavpils's.

What form are Super Nova and BFC Daugavpils in?

Over the last 5 games Super Nova have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and BFC Daugavpils 4-0-1 (2.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Super Nova vs BFC Daugavpils?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Super Nova vs BFC Daugavpils: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.