Swit vs Warta Sieradz: match statistics
Swit vs Warta Sieradz: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Swit played against Warta Sieradz in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Stadion Miejski. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Swit has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Warta Sieradz has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Swit scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.60. Warta Sieradz scores 1.60 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 3.50 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 40% of Swit's games and 60% of Warta Sieradz's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Swit has the higher season xG average, 2.36 to 1.91 per game. Swit takes 10.6 shots per game, while Warta Sieradz takes 17.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Swit leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Warta Sieradz leads at halftime in 20% and scores 1.20 after halftime.
When the teams score
Swit's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Warta Sieradz, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.50 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Świt hold a slight edge based on the quality of chances created: at home, they average 2.17 xG, while Warta Sieradz record 1.54 xG away from home. The hosts also take more shots (15 compared to 13.5), hit the target an average of 8 times per match, and maintain 56% possession, compared with 48% for their opponents. Both teams score an average of 2.5 goals per match, whether at home or away, but Świt convert 27% of their attempts, compared with 19% for Warta, increasing the hosts’ chances of turning their advantage into goals. Warta’s away defense is nevertheless solid, conceding an average of 0.5 goals and winning both of their two matches, so the prediction is not one-sided. In their last five matches, Świt have collected 8 points and Warta 7, and with the hosts’ clearly superior xG balance, a narrow Świt victory remains the most likely outcome.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by Świt’s very weak seasonal defense, which concedes an average of 2.67 goals per match and has kept no clean sheets. Warta Sieradz scores an average of 2.5 goals, registers 7 shots on target per game, and has a 19% conversion rate, so they should be able to exploit the hosts’ defensive vulnerability. Świt does score only 1.0 goal per match, but creates plenty of chances: their average xG is 2.16, rising to 2.36 across their last five matches. The main risk to this scenario is Warta’s defense, which concedes only 0.5 goals per season and has kept clean sheets in 50% of matches. However, recently the team has allowed opponents an average of 1.8 goals, with an xG against of 1.67. BTTS has landed in 67% of Świt’s matches and 60% of Warta’s last five games. Combined with the league average of 64%, this gives a moderate edge to the BTTS - Yes outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The match profile points to at least two goals: Świt have conceded an average of 2.67 goals in their matches so far, while Warta Sieradz have scored an average of 2.5. In their last five matches, both teams have frequently gone Over 2.5 goals, in 60% and 80% of cases respectively, compared with the league average of 64%. The hosts have created chances worth 2.36 xG across their last five appearances, while the visitors have recorded 1.91 xG, supporting a projected total close to 3.0 goals. The second-half data provides an additional argument, with the average number of goals standing at 2.67 in Świt matches and 2.5 in Warta matches. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as Świt have cleared this line in 100% of their matches, and the visitors' attack should be able to exploit the hosts' defensive weaknesses.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Warta Sieradz has an outstanding away record, winning 100% of its matches, scoring an average of 2.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while Świt have not won a single home match and concede 2.67 goals per game. The first half should nevertheless be evenly balanced, as Świt have been level at the break in 67% of their home matches, compared with 50% of Warta’s away fixtures; the visitors score only 0.5 goals per match before half-time. After the interval, Warta’s advantage increases significantly: they average 2.0 goals in the second half, while Świt concede as many as 2.0 goals during this period. In addition, the hosts have lost the second half in 67% of cases, whereas Warta have won every second half in their away matches so far. Świt’s recent results have been better, as they have conceded only 0.6 goals per match over their previous five games, but the visitors’ away and second-half statistics still provide the strongest support for an HT/FT draw/Warta win scenario (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Swit | Warta Sieradz | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 36% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.22 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.37 | 0.24 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Swit is 14% better for: last-5 form.
1.6 pts / game - Swit · 1.4 pts / game - Warta Sieradz
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Warta Sieradz is 14% better for: goals scored per game.
1.4 goals / game - Swit · 1.6 goals / game - Warta Sieradz
Swit is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.6 goals / game - Swit · 1.8 goals / game - Warta Sieradz
Swit scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).
Warta Sieradz scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Swit
Over / Under - Warta Sieradz
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Swit is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.4 pts / game - Swit · 1.2 pts / game - Warta Sieradz
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Swit - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Warta Sieradz - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.2 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 80% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 1.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 2.6 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 20% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Swit
Warta Sieradz
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).
Teams vs league
| Swit | Liga | Warta Sieradz | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.00 | 3.50 | ▼ 3.40 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 40% | 67% | ▼ 60% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 60% | 65% | ▲ 80% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 60% | 20% | • 20% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 20% | 65% | ▼ 60% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 40% | 77% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Warta SieradzGoalBartłomiej Kręcichwost
Head-to-head
Record from Swit's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Warta Sieradz. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Swit vs Warta Sieradz?
The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Swit 2:1 Warta Sieradz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Swit and Warta Sieradz?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Swit won 0, Warta Sieradz won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Swit vs Warta Sieradz?
Swit score 1.40 goals per game on average and Warta Sieradz 1.60. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Swit's matches and 60% of Warta Sieradz's.
What form are Swit and Warta Sieradz in?
Over the last 5 games Swit have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Warta Sieradz 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Swit vs Warta Sieradz?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


