Poland - 3 Liga Group 1Stadion MiejskiData current as of August 31, 2026

Swit vs Warta Sieradz: match statistics

Swit crest
Swit
2 : 1half-time 0:1
Warta Sieradz crest
Warta Sieradz

Swit vs Warta Sieradz: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Swit played against Warta Sieradz in 3 Liga Group 1 (Poland). The game was played on August 29, 2026. Venue: Stadion Miejski. Final score: 2:1.

Recent form

Swit has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 1.60 points per game. Warta Sieradz has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Swit scores 1.40 goals per game and allows 0.60. Warta Sieradz scores 1.60 and allows 1.80. Games in this league average 3.50 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 40% of Swit's games and 60% of Warta Sieradz's. The Over 2.5 rates are 60% and 80%, compared with league averages of 67% for BTTS and 65% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Swit has the higher season xG average, 2.36 to 1.91 per game. Swit takes 10.6 shots per game, while Warta Sieradz takes 17.6.

First-half and second-half trends

Swit leads at halftime in 20% of its games and scores 0.60 goals per game after halftime. Warta Sieradz leads at halftime in 20% and scores 1.20 after halftime.

When the teams score

Swit's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (2 goals). For Warta Sieradz, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

3 Liga Group 1 games average 3.50 goals. Both teams score in 67% of games, and 65% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Świt hold a slight edge based on the quality of chances created: at home, they average 2.17 xG, while Warta Sieradz record 1.54 xG away from home. The hosts also take more shots (15 compared to 13.5), hit the target an average of 8 times per match, and maintain 56% possession, compared with 48% for their opponents. Both teams score an average of 2.5 goals per match, whether at home or away, but Świt convert 27% of their attempts, compared with 19% for Warta, increasing the hosts’ chances of turning their advantage into goals. Warta’s away defense is nevertheless solid, conceding an average of 0.5 goals and winning both of their two matches, so the prediction is not one-sided. In their last five matches, Świt have collected 8 points and Warta 7, and with the hosts’ clearly superior xG balance, a narrow Świt victory remains the most likely outcome.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

The BTTS - Yes pick is primarily supported by Świt’s very weak seasonal defense, which concedes an average of 2.67 goals per match and has kept no clean sheets. Warta Sieradz scores an average of 2.5 goals, registers 7 shots on target per game, and has a 19% conversion rate, so they should be able to exploit the hosts’ defensive vulnerability. Świt does score only 1.0 goal per match, but creates plenty of chances: their average xG is 2.16, rising to 2.36 across their last five matches. The main risk to this scenario is Warta’s defense, which concedes only 0.5 goals per season and has kept clean sheets in 50% of matches. However, recently the team has allowed opponents an average of 1.8 goals, with an xG against of 1.67. BTTS has landed in 67% of Świt’s matches and 60% of Warta’s last five games. Combined with the league average of 64%, this gives a moderate edge to the BTTS - Yes outcome.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The match profile points to at least two goals: Świt have conceded an average of 2.67 goals in their matches so far, while Warta Sieradz have scored an average of 2.5. In their last five matches, both teams have frequently gone Over 2.5 goals, in 60% and 80% of cases respectively, compared with the league average of 64%. The hosts have created chances worth 2.36 xG across their last five appearances, while the visitors have recorded 1.91 xG, supporting a projected total close to 3.0 goals. The second-half data provides an additional argument, with the average number of goals standing at 2.67 in Świt matches and 2.5 in Warta matches. The strongest signal remains Over 1.5 goals, as Świt have cleared this line in 100% of their matches, and the visitors' attack should be able to exploit the hosts' defensive weaknesses.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Warta Sieradz has an outstanding away record, winning 100% of its matches, scoring an average of 2.5 goals and conceding just 0.5, while Świt have not won a single home match and concede 2.67 goals per game. The first half should nevertheless be evenly balanced, as Świt have been level at the break in 67% of their home matches, compared with 50% of Warta’s away fixtures; the visitors score only 0.5 goals per match before half-time. After the interval, Warta’s advantage increases significantly: they average 2.0 goals in the second half, while Świt concede as many as 2.0 goals during this period. In addition, the hosts have lost the second half in 67% of cases, whereas Warta have won every second half in their away matches so far. Świt’s recent results have been better, as they have conceded only 0.6 goals per match over their previous five games, but the visitors’ away and second-half statistics still provide the strongest support for an HT/FT draw/Warta win scenario (X/2).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
2 : 0
Second half

Game stats

57Possession (%)43
SwitWarta Sieradz
12Shots4
SwitWarta Sieradz
5Shots on target1
SwitWarta Sieradz
1.77xG0.88
SwitWarta Sieradz
5Corners3
SwitWarta Sieradz
90Dangerous attacks75
SwitWarta Sieradz
13Fouls19
SwitWarta Sieradz
0Cards0
SwitWarta Sieradz

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.4Goals scored / game1.6
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Goals allowed / game1.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
33%Average possession52%
SwitWarta Sieradz
3.8Shots on target / game6.8
SwitWarta Sieradz

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.6Shots per game17.6
SwitWarta Sieradz
3.8Shots on target6.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
13.2%Shot conversion9.1%
SwitWarta Sieradz
33%Possession52%
SwitWarta Sieradz
2.36xG for1.91
SwitWarta Sieradz
1.04xG against1.67
SwitWarta Sieradz

Shooting quality

Swit: Counter-attackingWarta Sieradz: Attacking
SwitWarta Sieradz
Accuracy (shots on target)36%39%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.220.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.370.24

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Swit is 14% better for: last-5 form.

1.6 pts / game - Swit · 1.4 pts / game - Warta Sieradz

Swit
WWDLD
Season result split
40% W40% R20% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game · goal difference +4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
1-0-1
Last 5 at home
1-0-1
WL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.6xG: 2.36Opponent xG: 1.04BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
Warta Sieradz
LWDWL
Season result split
40% W20% R40% P
Season (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-1-2
1.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-0-0
Last 5 away
2-0-0
WW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.8xG: 1.91Opponent xG: 1.67BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 80%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Warta Sieradz is 14% better for: goals scored per game.

1.4 goals / game - Swit · 1.6 goals / game - Warta Sieradz

Swit is 200% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.6 goals / game - Swit · 1.8 goals / game - Warta Sieradz

Swit scoring profile: strong

Swit scores in 60% of games (3 of 5 meczów), while Warta Sieradz keeps a clean sheet in 20% (1 of 5 meczów).

Warta Sieradz scoring profile: mixed

Warta Sieradz scores in 80% of games (4 of 5 meczów), while Swit keeps a clean sheet in 60% (3 of 5 meczów).

7Goals scored (season)8
SwitWarta Sieradz
3Goals conceded (season)9
SwitWarta Sieradz
2Average goals per game3.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
7Goals scored (last 5)8
SwitWarta Sieradz
3Goals conceded (last 5)9
SwitWarta Sieradz

How often they score at least...

60%1 goal80%
SwitWarta Sieradz
40%2 goals40%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%3 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%4 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz

How often they concede at least...

40%1 goal80%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%2 goals60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
0%3 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
0%4 goals20%
SwitWarta Sieradz

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

0%BTTS at half-time20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
0%BTTS in both halves0%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Scored in both halves20%
SwitWarta Sieradz

BTTS and goal count

40%Min. 3 goals and BTTS60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 3 goals without BTTS20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
40%BTTS - last 560%
SwitWarta Sieradz

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

20%Min. 1 goal before half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 2 goals before half-time20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
SwitWarta Sieradz

2nd half

40%Min. 1 goal after half-time100%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 2 goals after half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Swit is 17% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.4 pts / game - Swit · 1.2 pts / game - Warta Sieradz

Swit - half-time state
20% leading80% draw0% trailing
Warta Sieradz - half-time state
20% leading60% draw20% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.4Points per game (1st half)1.2
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Goals scored (1st half)0.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
0Goals conceded (1st half)0.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Average goals (1st half)0.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
100%Clean sheet before half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz
80%No goal before half-time60%
SwitWarta Sieradz

After half-time (2nd half)

1.8Points per game (2nd half)1.8
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.6Goals scored (2nd half)1.2
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.2Goals conceded (2nd half)1.4
SwitWarta Sieradz
0.8Average goals (2nd half)2.6
SwitWarta Sieradz
80%Clean sheet after half-time20%
SwitWarta Sieradz
60%No goal after half-time40%
SwitWarta Sieradz

Swit - second-half results

40% W60% R0% P
7
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+3
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
+2
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.40
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Warta Sieradz - second-half results

60% W0% R40% P
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
0
Goal difference (1st half)
9
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.20
PPG before half-time
Lead holding200%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 40%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+1.0

Allows 1.0 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Swit - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.401.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game0.00.2
Average goals per game0.60.8
1 goal20%40%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet100%80%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference+3+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 60% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 3
Warta Sieradz - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.80
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.41.4
Average goals per game0.82.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals20%60%
3 goals0%60%
Clean sheet60%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference0-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Swit
ScoredConceded
2
2
0-15
2
0
16-30
0
0
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
0
61-75
1
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (2 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Warta Sieradz
ScoredConceded
1
1
0-15
1
0
16-30
0
1
31-45
1
5
46-60
2
1
61-75
3
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

2.70
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.6 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
77%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
50%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-7%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
48%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Swit

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+1.32
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.52
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.96
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.44
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
71%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
39%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
14% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 29% come in the first quarter-hour.
14%

Warta Sieradz

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.44
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+0.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.31
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.13
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
104%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
92%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
0.00
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.8
Late goals
38% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
38%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (3 Liga Group 1).

Teams vs league

SwitLigaWarta Sieradz
Average goals per game 2.003.50 3.40
Both teams scored 40%67% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 60%65% 80%
Clean sheets 60%20% 20%
Goal before half-time 20%65% 60%
Goal after half-time 40%77% 100%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.50
Average goals per game
67%
Both teams scored
65%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
20%
Clean sheets
1.96
Home goals / game
1.54
Away goals / game
+27%
Home attack advantage
+21%
Home defensive advantage
+9%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
65%
1 goal
40%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
6%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
77%
1 goal
56%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Bartłomiej Kręcichwost⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Warta SieradzGoalBartłomiej Kręcichwost

Head-to-head

Record from Swit's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses against Warta Sieradz. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

Warta Sieradz
3 : 1
Swit
Swit
0 : 1
Warta Sieradz

FAQ

What was the result of Swit vs Warta Sieradz?

The 3 Liga Group 1 match finished Swit 2:1 Warta Sieradz. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Swit and Warta Sieradz?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Swit won 0, Warta Sieradz won 2 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Swit vs Warta Sieradz?

Swit score 1.40 goals per game on average and Warta Sieradz 1.60. The 3 Liga Group 1 average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 65% of games. Both teams score in 40% of Swit's matches and 60% of Warta Sieradz's.

What form are Swit and Warta Sieradz in?

Over the last 5 games Swit have a 2-2-1 record (1.60 points per game) and Warta Sieradz 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Swit vs Warta Sieradz?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.