Tampines Rovers vs Tanjong Pagar: match statistics
Tampines Rovers demonstrate significantly higher form and quality compared to Tanjong Pagar. The hosts occupy 2nd place in the table with a 4-2-0 record and impressive offensive efficiency (18 goals this season), while the visitors are in 7th position with a very weak 1-1-5 record and a -9 goal difference. In home matches, Tampines average 3.33 goals per game with an xG of 2.26, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede an average of 2 goals per away match and have not won any game (0% win rate). The form from the last five matches also favors the hosts (9 points) as opposed to the visitors (just 1 point). All key statistical indicators, including possession (59% vs 47%), shot accuracy, and expected goals, point to a clear advantage for Tampines Rovers, making them the obvious favorite for this encounter.
Tampines Rovers vs Tanjong Pagar: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tampines Rovers played against Tanjong Pagar in S.League (Singapore). The game was played on January 31, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Tampines Rovers has 4 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 2.60 points per game. Tanjong Pagar has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Tampines Rovers scores 3.00 goals per game and allows 1.00. Tanjong Pagar scores 1.43 and allows 2.71. Games in this league average 3.86 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Tampines Rovers's games and 71% of Tanjong Pagar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 83% and 86%, compared with league averages of 57% for BTTS and 79% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tampines Rovers has the higher season xG average, 2.15 to 1.34 per game. Tampines Rovers takes 17.2 shots per game, while Tanjong Pagar takes 10.9.
First-half and second-half trends
Tampines Rovers leads at halftime in 50% of its games and scores 1.67 goals per game after halftime. Tanjong Pagar leads at halftime in 14% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tampines Rovers's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). For Tanjong Pagar, it is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
S.League games average 3.86 goals. Both teams score in 57% of games, and 79% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tampines Rovers demonstrate significantly higher form and quality compared to Tanjong Pagar. The hosts occupy 2nd place in the table with a 4-2-0 record and impressive offensive efficiency (18 goals this season), while the visitors are in 7th position with a very weak 1-1-5 record and a -9 goal difference. In home matches, Tampines average 3.33 goals per game with an xG of 2.26, whereas Tanjong Pagar concede an average of 2 goals per away match and have not won any game (0% win rate). The form from the last five matches also favors the hosts (9 points) as opposed to the visitors (just 1 point). All key statistical indicators, including possession (59% vs 47%), shot accuracy, and expected goals, point to a clear advantage for Tampines Rovers, making them the obvious favorite for this encounter.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tampines Rovers | Tanjong Pagar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 40% | 36% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.44 | 0.37 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tampines Rovers is 225% better for: last-5 form.
2.6 pts / game - Tampines Rovers · 0.8 pts / game - Tanjong Pagar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tampines Rovers is 110% better for: goals scored per game.
3 goals / game - Tampines Rovers · 1.43 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar
Tampines Rovers is 171% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Tampines Rovers · 2.71 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar
Tampines Rovers scores in 83% of games (5 of 6 meczów), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 7 meczów).
Tanjong Pagar scores in 71% of games (5 of 7 meczów), while Tampines Rovers keeps a clean sheet in 33% (2 of 6 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tampines Rovers
Over / Under - Tanjong Pagar
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tampines Rovers is 182% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
2 pts / game - Tampines Rovers · 0.71 pts / game - Tanjong Pagar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tampines Rovers - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 50% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Tanjong Pagar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 14%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.6 | 2.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 100% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 20% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): -4 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tampines Rovers
Tanjong Pagar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Tampines Rovers | Liga | Tanjong Pagar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.00 | 3.86 | ▲ 4.14 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 57% | ▲ 71% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 83% | 79% | ▲ 86% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 23% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 67% | 89% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 83% | 89% | ▼ 86% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Head-to-head
Record from Tampines Rovers's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 0 losses against Tanjong Pagar. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tampines Rovers vs Tanjong Pagar?
The S.League match finished Tampines Rovers 2:1 Tanjong Pagar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tampines Rovers vs Tanjong Pagar?
Tampines Rovers score 3.00 goals per game on average and Tanjong Pagar 1.43. The S.League average is 3.86 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 79% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Tampines Rovers's matches and 71% of Tanjong Pagar's.
What form are Tampines Rovers and Tanjong Pagar in?
Over the last 5 games Tampines Rovers have a 4-1-0 record (2.60 points per game) and Tanjong Pagar 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tampines Rovers vs Tanjong Pagar?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.