Tanjong Pagar vs Albirex Niigata S: match statistics
Albirex Niigata S is the overwhelming favorite for this encounter. The hosts, Tanjong Pagar, are in disastrous form with a streak of five consecutive defeats and a goal difference of -11 in home matches, where they concede an average of 3.6 goals per game while scoring just 1.4. The visiting team occupies third place in the table with an impressive 67% away win rate and a goal difference of +8. Albirex Niigata S presents a solid defense (67% clean sheets away) and a potent offense (averaging 2.17 goals per away match). xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.79 xG For vs 1.01 xG Against), while the hosts have a negative expected goals balance. Given the massive disparity in form, quality, and efficiency, a decisive victory for Albirex Niigata S is the most probable scenario.
Tanjong Pagar vs Albirex Niigata S: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tanjong Pagar played against Albirex Niigata S in S.League (Singapore). The game was played on March 6, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Tanjong Pagar has 0 wins, 0 draws and 5 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.00 points per game. Albirex Niigata S has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 2.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Tanjong Pagar scores 1.08 goals per game and allows 3.17. Albirex Niigata S scores 2.27 and allows 1.18. Games in this league average 3.79 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 67% of Tanjong Pagar's games and 45% of Albirex Niigata S's. The Over 2.5 rates are 92% and 73%, compared with league averages of 60% for BTTS and 77% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Albirex Niigata S has the higher season xG average, 1.91 to 1.31 per game. Tanjong Pagar takes 11.0 shots per game, while Albirex Niigata S takes 15.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Tanjong Pagar leads at halftime in 8% of its games and scores 0.75 goals per game after halftime. Albirex Niigata S leads at halftime in 73% and scores 1.09 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tanjong Pagar's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (5 goals). For Albirex Niigata S, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
S.League games average 3.79 goals. Both teams score in 60% of games, and 77% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 5.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Albirex Niigata S is the overwhelming favorite for this encounter. The hosts, Tanjong Pagar, are in disastrous form with a streak of five consecutive defeats and a goal difference of -11 in home matches, where they concede an average of 3.6 goals per game while scoring just 1.4. The visiting team occupies third place in the table with an impressive 67% away win rate and a goal difference of +8. Albirex Niigata S presents a solid defense (67% clean sheets away) and a potent offense (averaging 2.17 goals per away match). xG statistics also favor the visitors (1.79 xG For vs 1.01 xG Against), while the hosts have a negative expected goals balance. Given the massive disparity in form, quality, and efficiency, a decisive victory for Albirex Niigata S is the most probable scenario.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tanjong Pagar | Albirex Niigata S | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.29 | 0.36 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Albirex Niigata S is 110% better for: goals scored per game.
1.08 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar · 2.27 goals / game - Albirex Niigata S
Albirex Niigata S is 169% better for: goals allowed per game.
3.17 goals / game - Tanjong Pagar · 1.18 goals / game - Albirex Niigata S
Tanjong Pagar scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Albirex Niigata S keeps a clean sheet in 45% (5 of 11 meczów).
Albirex Niigata S scores in 91% of games (10 of 11 meczów), while Tanjong Pagar keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanjong Pagar
Over / Under - Albirex Niigata S
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Albirex Niigata S is 354% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.5 pts / game - Tanjong Pagar · 2.27 pts / game - Albirex Niigata S
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanjong Pagar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 8% of games and wins 8%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Albirex Niigata S - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 73% of games and wins 64%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| Average goals per game | 2.0 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 60% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 80% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -8 | -8 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.00 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tanjong Pagar
Albirex Niigata S
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (S.League).
Teams vs league
| Tanjong Pagar | Liga | Albirex Niigata S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 4.25 | 3.79 | ▼ 3.45 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 67% | 60% | ▼ 45% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 92% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 0% | 21% | ▲ 45% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 100% | 87% | ▲ 91% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 92% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tanjong Pagar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Albirex Niigata S. Games average 5.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanjong Pagar vs Albirex Niigata S?
The S.League match finished Tanjong Pagar 0:2 Albirex Niigata S. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanjong Pagar vs Albirex Niigata S?
Tanjong Pagar score 1.08 goals per game on average and Albirex Niigata S 2.27. The S.League average is 3.79 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 77% of games. Both teams score in 67% of Tanjong Pagar's matches and 45% of Albirex Niigata S's.
What form are Tanjong Pagar and Albirex Niigata S in?
Over the last 5 games Tanjong Pagar have a 0-0-5 record (0.00 points per game) and Albirex Niigata S 3-1-1 (2.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanjong Pagar vs Albirex Niigata S?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanjong Pagar vs Albirex Niigata S: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.