Egypt - Second DivisionTanta StadiumData current as of October 04, 2026

Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood: match statistics

Tanta SC crest
Tanta SC
0 : 2half-time 0:0
Haras El Hodood crest
Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tanta SC played against Haras El Hodood in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on October 2, 2026. Venue: Tanta Stadium. Final score: 0:2.

Recent form

Tanta SC has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.00 points per game. Haras El Hodood has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Tanta SC scores 0.67 goals per game and allows 0.83. Haras El Hodood scores 1.33 and allows 0.33. Games in this league average 2.14 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 33% of Tanta SC's games and 33% of Haras El Hodood's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 45% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Haras El Hodood has the higher season xG average, 1.30 to 1.15 per game. Tanta SC takes 7.8 shots per game, while Haras El Hodood takes 11.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Tanta SC leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.33 goals per game after halftime. Haras El Hodood leads at halftime in 33% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tanta SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 31-45+ (2 goals). For Haras El Hodood, it is minutes 76-90+ (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Second Division games average 2.14 goals. Both teams score in 45% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

There is not enough head-to-head history for a meaningful comparison.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Haras El Hodood are 2nd and remain unbeaten after 6 matches, while Tanta SC are 9th with a record of 2 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses. The visitors have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 win for the hosts; over that period, they scored 6 and 2 goals respectively. Away from home, Haras average 1.33 goals scored and 0.33 conceded, compared with Tanta’s home averages of 1 goal scored and 0.67 conceded. The visitors’ advantage is also reflected in chance quality: their away xG stands at 1.48, with 1.04 xG conceded, while Tanta’s home figures are 1.21 and 1.47. Both teams have won 2 of their respective 3 away and home matches, so a draw remains a realistic possibility, but the visitors’ stronger defensive record and recent form make them the more compelling pick.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Both teams kept a clean sheet in 67% of their matches under the conditions analyzed, while matches with goals from both sides account for just 33% for each team, compared with 45% league-wide. Tanta have scored just 2 goals in their last 5 matches, averaging 0.4, while Haras El Hodood have conceded an average of 0.4 goals over the same period. The quality of chances also points to a difficult task for the hosts: their recent average xG is 0.87, while their opponents have allowed chances worth an average of 0.99 xG. The visitors have a higher recent attacking xG, at 1.35 compared with Tanta’s 0.87, so they may score—but that does not necessarily mean both teams will find the net. The strongest signal, therefore, is that at least one team will fail to score (BTTS - No); this does not automatically mean a 0-0 scoreline.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The strongest pick is Under 3.5 goals: none of the teams’ matches so far this season have gone over this line, although the sample size is small. In their last five matches, Tanta scored an average of just 0.4 goals, while Haras conceded 0.4, limiting expectations for the hosts. The visitors look more threatening in attack, with an average xG of 1.48 compared with Tanta’s 1.12, but both teams have conceded an average of 0.33 goals per match this season. The projected total of 1.94 goals is also close to the league average of 2.02, so despite the visitors’ attacking advantage, four goals look unlikely.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as it occurred in 4 of Haras El Hodood’s last 5 matches and 3 of Tanta SC’s 5 fixtures. The visitors should gain the upper hand after the break: over their last 5 matches, they averaged 0.8 goals in the second half, while the hosts failed to score in that period. The visitors’ current form also points to an away win: they have won 3 of their last 5 matches, compared with just 1 for Tanta, averaging 1.2 goals against the hosts’ 0.4. Haras El Hodood also create more chances, posting an average xG of 1.48 compared with their opponents’ 1.12 and recording 5 shots on target per match against 3.67. With half-time draws occurring so frequently and a clear gap in recent results, the HT/FT scenario of a draw at the break followed by an away win at full-time has the strongest support in the data.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
0 : 2
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
5Shots10
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0Shots on target3
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0xG0
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
8Corners8
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0Dangerous attacks0
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
-1Fouls-1
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
-1Cards-1
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.67Goals scored / game1.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.83Goals allowed / game0.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
49%Average possession50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
3.17Shots on target / game4.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

7.83Shots per game11.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
3.17Shots on target4.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
8.5%Shot conversion11.8%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
49%Possession50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
1.15xG for1.3
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
1.34xG against1.12
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Shooting quality

Tanta SC: BalancedHaras El Hodood: Balanced
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
Accuracy (shots on target)40%38%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.210.31

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Haras El Hodood is 120% better for: last-5 form.

1 pts / game - Tanta SC · 2.2 pts / game - Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC
DLLWD
Season result split
33% W33% D33% L
Season (W-D-L)
2-2-2
1.33 pts / game · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-2-2
1.00 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-0-1
Last 5 at home
2-0-1
WLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.4Goals conceded: 0.8xG: 0.87Opponent xG: 1.37BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
Haras El Hodood
DWWWD
Unbeaten in the last 5 games
Season result split
67% W33% D0% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-2-0
2.33 pts / game · goal difference +6
Last 5 (W-D-L)
3-2-0
2.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-1-0
Last 5 away
2-1-0
DWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.35Opponent xG: 0.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Haras El Hodood is 99% better for: goals scored per game.

0.67 goals / game - Tanta SC · 1.33 goals / game - Haras El Hodood

Haras El Hodood is 152% better for: goals allowed per game.

0.83 goals / game - Tanta SC · 0.33 goals / game - Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC scoring profile: more difficult

Tanta SC scores in 50% of games (3 of 6 games), while Haras El Hodood keeps a clean sheet in 67% (4 of 6 games).

Haras El Hodood scoring profile: mixed

Haras El Hodood scores in 67% of games (4 of 6 games), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 50% (3 of 6 games).

4Goals scored (season)8
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
5Goals conceded (season)2
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
1.5Average goals per game1.67
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
2Goals scored (last 5)6
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
4Goals conceded (last 5)2
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

How often they score at least...

50%1 goal67%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%2 goals67%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%3 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

How often they concede at least...

50%1 goal33%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%2 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%3 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%4 goals0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

45%
League average

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%BTTS in both halves0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Scored in both halves50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

BTTS and goal count

33%Min. 3 goals and BTTS33%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
20%BTTS - last 540%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

67%Min. 1 goal before half-time50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
17%Min. 2 goals before half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

2nd half

33%Min. 1 goal after half-time67%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
33%Min. 2 goals after half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0%Min. 3 goals after half-time17%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Haras El Hodood is 67% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / game - Tanta SC · 1.67 pts / game - Haras El Hodood

Tanta SC - half-time state
17% leading50% draw33% trailing
Haras El Hodood - half-time state
33% leading67% draw0% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per game (1st half)1.67
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.33Goals scored (1st half)0.5
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.5Goals conceded (1st half)0.17
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.83Average goals (1st half)0.67
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
50%Clean sheet before half-time83%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
67%No goal before half-time50%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

After half-time (2nd half)

1.17Points per game (2nd half)2.33
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.33Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.33Goals conceded (2nd half)0.17
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
0.67Average goals (2nd half)1
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
83%Clean sheet after half-time83%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood
83%No goal after half-time33%
Tanta SCHaras El Hodood

Tanta SC - second-half results

17% W67% D17% L
6
Half-time points
2
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
7
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding194%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Haras El Hodood - second-half results

67% W33% D0% L
10
Half-time points
3
Half-time goals
+2
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
+4
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.67
PPG before half-time
Lead holding203%

Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tanta SC - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.200.80
Goals scored / game0.40.0
Goals allowed / game0.40.4
Average goals per game0.80.4
1 goal60%20%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%0%
Clean sheet60%80%
No goal60%100%
Goal difference0-2
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
Haras El Hodood - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.402.20
Goals scored / game0.40.8
Goals allowed / game0.20.2
Average goals per game0.61.0
1 goal40%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference+1+3
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 40% draw - 0% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tanta SC
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
0
0
16-30
2
3
31-45
1
0
46-60
1
2
61-75
0
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (2 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

Haras El Hodood
ScoredConceded
0
0
0-15
2
0
16-30
1
1
31-45
1
0
46-60
0
0
61-75
4
1
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (1). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

1.58
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
0.5 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
74%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
33%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
34%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
17%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 6 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tanta SC

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.19
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.03
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+1.0 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.48
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.51
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
54%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
91%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.33
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
0.0
Late goals
0% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
0%

Haras El Hodood

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.18
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.82
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.03
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.79
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
146%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
27%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.13
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
50% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 0% come in the first quarter-hour.
50%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

Tanta SCLigaHaras El Hodood
Average goals per game▼ 1.502.14▼ 1.67
Both teams scored▼ 33%45%▼ 33%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 33%36%▼ 33%
Clean sheets▲ 50%34%▲ 67%
Goal before half-time▲ 67%58%▼ 50%
Goal after half-time▼ 33%75%▼ 67%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.14
Average goals per game
45%
Both teams scored
36%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
34%
Clean sheets
1.23
Home goals / game
0.91
Away goals / game
+35%
Home attack advantage
+26%
Home defensive advantage
+16%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
58%
1 goal
16%
2 goals
3%
3 goals
2%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
42%
2 goals
13%
3 goals
5%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. Haras El HodoodGoalAhmed Nayel

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

FAQ

What was the result of Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?

The Second Division match finished Tanta SC 0:2 Haras El Hodood. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?

Tanta SC score 0.67 goals per game on average and Haras El Hodood 1.33. The Second Division average is 2.14 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Tanta SC's matches and 33% of Haras El Hodood's.

What form are Tanta SC and Haras El Hodood in?

Over the last 5 games Tanta SC have a 1-2-2 record (1.00 points per game) and Haras El Hodood 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanta SC vs Haras El Hodood?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.