Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: match statistics
Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tanzania Prisons played against Mtibwa Sugar in Ligi kuu Bara (Tanzania). The game was played on June 27, 2026. Venue: Sokoine Stadium. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Tanzania Prisons has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Mtibwa Sugar has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Tanzania Prisons scores 0.71 goals per game and allows 1.39. Mtibwa Sugar scores 0.82 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 2.17 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 32% of Tanzania Prisons's games and 46% of Mtibwa Sugar's. The Over 2.5 rates are 39% and 50%, compared with league averages of 35% for BTTS and 39% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Mtibwa Sugar has the higher season xG average, 0.98 to 0.94 per game. Tanzania Prisons takes 4.0 shots per game, while Mtibwa Sugar takes 3.4.
First-half and second-half trends
Tanzania Prisons leads at halftime in 18% of its games and scores 0.32 goals per game after halftime. Mtibwa Sugar leads at halftime in 7% and scores 0.43 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tanzania Prisons's most productive scoring window is minutes 0-15 (6 goals). For Mtibwa Sugar, it is minutes 31-45+ (7 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Ligi kuu Bara games average 2.17 goals. Both teams score in 35% of games, and 39% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tanzania Prisons are favorites on paper: at home they score an average of 0.79 goals and concede 1.21 per match, while Mtibwa Sugar on the road records only 0.31 scored and 1.62 conceded. The hosts have won 3 of their last 5 matches and scored 8 goals in those games, also averaging 1.8 points in their last five; the visitors haven’t won any of their last 5 (0 wins, 1 draw) and average just 0.2 points. Mtibwa attempt more shots (4.78 average and 2.11 on target away), but their conversion rate is only 5% and they fail to score in 69% of away matches, whereas the hosts have a 26% conversion on 3.17 shots. It’s also notable that offensive xG is similar (0.79 vs 0.87), but Mtibwa are exposed to worse opposing chances (average xG against 1.78 versus 1.10 for the hosts) and have a poorer away goal difference (-17 vs -6 for the hosts). Given better form (3 wins vs 0), higher efficiency and a more stable home defense, I back Tanzania Prisons to win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The "No" scenario is more likely because Mtibwa Sugar failed to score in 69% of matches this season and averages only 0.31 goals per game, which significantly reduces the chance of BTTS. Tanzania Prisons average 1.27 goals and have an xG of 1.09, so the home side will likely find the net, but BTTS also requires a goal from the visitors; the hosts concede 1.53 goals per game on average, which partly balances the odds. In the last 5 matches Mtibwa scored 0.6 goals and had BTTS in 40% of games, while Tanzania scored 1.6 in that period and had BTTS in 60% — this shows the visitors’ offensive edge and the home side’s limited effectiveness. Shot conversion 13% versus 5% and a league BTTS rate of 35% with 78% of matches featuring a clean sheet further argue for a low probability of both teams scoring, hence an assessment of 70% for "No" and 30% for "BTTS - Yes".
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Based on xG (xg_for_avg_home = 1.09 and xg_against_avg_away = 1.78) I forecast 1.44 goals for Tanzania Prisons, and with xg_for_avg_away = 0.87 and xg_against_avg_home = 1.31 I forecast 1.09 for Mtibwa; total expected goals = 2.53. A Poisson distribution on this mean implies roughly a 72% probability of Over 1.5 goals, supported by seasonal over1.5 rates: 80% for the home side and 62% for the away side. The 2.5 line is less certain — the model gives ~46% for Over 2.5 (Under 54%); although the home team has 60% of matches >2.5 this season, the away team only 38%, so there is no clear edge. The hosts average 6.78 shots with a 13% conversion rate (vs 4.78 and 5% for Mtibwa) and have scored 8 goals in the last 5 matches (1.6 avg) versus 3 for the visitors (0.6), which strengthens the goal-scoring scenario on the home side. In summary, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (recommended), while Over 2.5 is borderline and Over 3.5 has low probability (~25%).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 – Tanzania Prisons to lead at the break and the hosts to win at Full-Time. The hosts average 1.27 goals per match versus 0.31 for Mtibwa Sugar, and in the last 5 fixtures the hosts have won 3 of 5 (60%) while the visitors have recorded no wins (0%). Tanzania Prisons also have higher xG (1.09 vs 0.87), attempt more shots (6.78 vs 4.78) and convert them far better (13% vs 5%), while the visitors concede more xG (1.78) than the hosts (1.31). By Half-Time the hosts average 0.5 goals versus 0.15 for the visitors, and 86% of the hosts’ matches featured over 0.5 goals at the break, which reinforces the prediction of the hosts leading at Half-Time.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tanzania Prisons | Mtibwa Sugar | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 35% | 33% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.24 | 0.29 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.51 | 0.74 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tanzania Prisons is 800% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Tanzania Prisons · 0.2 pts / game - Mtibwa Sugar
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Mtibwa Sugar is 15% better for: goals scored per game.
0.71 goals / game - Tanzania Prisons · 0.82 goals / game - Mtibwa Sugar
Tanzania Prisons is 13% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.39 goals / game - Tanzania Prisons · 1.57 goals / game - Mtibwa Sugar
Tanzania Prisons scores in 46% of games (13 of 28 meczów), while Mtibwa Sugar keeps a clean sheet in 21% (6 of 28 meczów).
Mtibwa Sugar scores in 54% of games (15 of 28 meczów), while Tanzania Prisons keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tanzania Prisons
Over / Under - Mtibwa Sugar
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tanzania Prisons is 63% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.04 pts / game - Tanzania Prisons · 0.64 pts / game - Mtibwa Sugar
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tanzania Prisons - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Mtibwa Sugar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 7% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.6 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | 0 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.20 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 1.4 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -5 | -4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (6 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tanzania Prisons
Mtibwa Sugar
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Ligi kuu Bara).
Teams vs league
| Tanzania Prisons | Liga | Mtibwa Sugar | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 2.11 | 2.17 | ▲ 2.39 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 32% | 35% | ▲ 46% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 39% | 39% | ▲ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 29% | 39% | ▼ 21% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 64% | 60% | ▲ 75% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 57% | 63% | ▲ 68% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Record from Tanzania Prisons's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Mtibwa Sugar. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?
The Ligi kuu Bara match finished Tanzania Prisons 2:1 Mtibwa Sugar. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?
Tanzania Prisons score 0.71 goals per game on average and Mtibwa Sugar 0.82. The Ligi kuu Bara average is 2.17 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 39% of games. Both teams score in 32% of Tanzania Prisons's matches and 46% of Mtibwa Sugar's.
What form are Tanzania Prisons and Mtibwa Sugar in?
Over the last 5 games Tanzania Prisons have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Mtibwa Sugar 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tanzania Prisons vs Mtibwa Sugar: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.


