Telecom Egypt SC vs Tanta SC: match statistics
Telecom Egypt SC vs Tanta SC: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Telecom Egypt SC played against Tanta SC in Second Division (Egypt). The game was played on September 11, 2026. Final score: 3:1.
Recent form
Telecom Egypt SC has 2 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Tanta SC has 1 win, 1 draw and 1 loss, with 1.33 points per game.
Scoring records
Telecom Egypt SC scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.00. Tanta SC scores 0.67 and allows 0.67. Games in this league average 1.94 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 33% of Telecom Egypt SC's games and 33% of Tanta SC's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 33%, compared with league averages of 40% for BTTS and 34% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Telecom Egypt SC has the higher season xG average, 1.25 to 1.15 per game. Telecom Egypt SC takes 9.3 shots per game, while Tanta SC takes 8.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Telecom Egypt SC leads at halftime in 33% of its games and scores 0.67 goals per game after halftime. Tanta SC leads at halftime in 0% and scores 0.67 after halftime.
When the teams score
Telecom Egypt SC's most productive scoring window is minutes 16-30 (2 goals). For Tanta SC, it is minutes 46-60 (1 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Second Division games average 1.94 goals. Both teams score in 40% of games, and 34% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Telecom Egypt SC have the home advantage: they have won 100% of their matches at home so far, scoring an average of 2 goals per game. Tanta SC have yet to score away from home, drawing 100% of such matches, while also conceding no goals in those fixtures. The hosts average 9 shots and 3 on target, compared with Tanta’s 8 attempts and 2 on target, while their conversion rate stands at 22%. The teams’ recent form is comparable, with Telecom averaging 1.4 points per game over their last five appearances and Tanta 1.6, although the visitors have scored just 7 goals during that period. Both teams have an xG of 1.03 under the respective conditions, but Telecom’s superior actual attacking efficiency at home points to a narrow victory for the hosts.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as Tanta have yet to average a goal per match in the seasonal data while also keeping a clean sheet in 100% of their games. Telecom Egypt are likewise not a team that scores regularly: they have averaged just 0.8 goals over their last 5 matches, with BTTS occurring in only 20% of those games. The league-wide BTTS average is just 37%, alongside a very low average of 1.77 goals per match, supporting a scenario in which at least one side fails to score. Tanta do have the better current attacking output, averaging 1.4 goals with an xG of 1.46 across their last 5 appearances, but Telecom’s defense conceded only 1.2 goals during that period. The combination of the hosts’ low finishing efficiency and the visitors’ season-long defensive solidity makes a result in which at least one team fails to score more likely.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The league profile clearly favors low-scoring results: the average is only 1.77 goals per match, and just 27% of games go Over 2.5 goals. In their last five matches, Telecom Egypt averaged 0.8 goals scored and 1.2 conceded, while Tanta recorded 1.4 and 0.8 goals, respectively. The xG figures from the last five appearances suggest moderate attacking potential, at 1.12 for the home side and 1.46 for the visitors, but do not point to an open, four-goal game. Both teams had 100% of their matches below 3.5 goals in the season data, while the 2.5-goal line was exceeded in only 40% of the last five matches involving either side. Therefore, the strongest option is Under 3.5 goals, as the projected total of 2.05 goals provides a substantial safety margin against the high line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time and after the final whistle, as Tanta drew 40% of their last five matches, while both teams were level at the break in 40% of this sample. The first halves are expected to be highly cautious: each team averaged only 0.4 goals during the opening 45 minutes across their last five matches, while the league recorded at least two first-half goals in just 10% of games. Tanta have clearly been more defensively solid in their current form, conceding an average of 0.8 goals compared with Telecom Egypt’s 1.2, although the hosts produce more shots on target, 4.0 versus 2.0. After the break, the visitors averaged 1.0 goal across their last five appearances, but they also kept a clean sheet in 80% of those second halves, which supports the likelihood of maintaining a level score. The hosts have been more dangerous after half-time in the season data, averaging 1.0 goal, so the draw remains a safer option than backing Tanta to win outright.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Telecom Egypt SC | Tanta SC | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 39% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Telecom Egypt SC is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Telecom Egypt SC · 1.33 pts / game - Tanta SC
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Telecom Egypt SC is 99% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Telecom Egypt SC · 0.67 goals / game - Tanta SC
Tanta SC is 49% better for: goals allowed per game.
1 goals / game - Telecom Egypt SC · 0.67 goals / game - Tanta SC
Telecom Egypt SC scores in 67% of games (2 of 3 games), while Tanta SC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
Tanta SC scores in 33% of games (1 of 3 games), while Telecom Egypt SC keeps a clean sheet in 33% (1 of 3 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Telecom Egypt SC
Over / Under - Tanta SC
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Telecom Egypt SC is 303% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / game - Telecom Egypt SC · 0.33 pts / game - Tanta SC
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Telecom Egypt SC - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 67%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Tanta SC - second-half results
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.3 | 0.7 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 1.3 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 33% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 67% | 33% |
| No goal | 67% | 67% |
| Goal difference | +1 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.33 | 1.67 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.7 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 1 goal | 67% | 33% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 33% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 33% | 100% |
| No goal | 100% | 67% |
| Goal difference | -2 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (2 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (1 goal). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Telecom Egypt SC
Tanta SC
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Telecom Egypt SC | Liga | Tanta SC | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.33 | 1.94 | ▼ 1.33 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 33% | 40% | ▼ 33% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 33% | 34% | • 33% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 33% | 39% | ▼ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 67% | 51% | ▲ 67% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 100% | 74% | ▼ 33% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Other recorded players
Away team
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
- Telecom Egypt SCGoalMahmoud Labib
Head-to-head
Record from Telecom Egypt SC's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses against Tanta SC. Games average 1.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Telecom Egypt SC vs Tanta SC?
The Second Division match finished Telecom Egypt SC 3:1 Tanta SC. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Telecom Egypt SC and Tanta SC?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches Telecom Egypt SC won 0, Tanta SC won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Telecom Egypt SC vs Tanta SC?
Telecom Egypt SC score 1.33 goals per game on average and Tanta SC 0.67. The Second Division average is 1.94 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 34% of games. Both teams score in 33% of Telecom Egypt SC's matches and 33% of Tanta SC's.
What form are Telecom Egypt SC and Tanta SC in?
Over the last 5 games Telecom Egypt SC have a 2-0-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Tanta SC 1-1-1 (1.33 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Telecom Egypt SC vs Tanta SC?
The statistical background for Telecom Egypt SC vs Tanta SC — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


