Telstar vs Groningen: match statistics
Telstar vs Groningen: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Telstar played against Groningen in Eredivisie (Netherlands). The game was played on April 4, 2026. Final score: 0:2.
Recent form
Telstar has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.80 points per game. Groningen has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses, with 1.40 points per game.
Scoring records
Telstar scores 1.36 goals per game and allows 1.64. Groningen scores 1.43 and allows 1.32. Games in this league average 3.21 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 64% of Telstar's games and 54% of Groningen's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 54%, compared with league averages of 64% for BTTS and 63% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Groningen has the higher season xG average, 1.74 to 1.48 per game. Telstar takes 13.1 shots per game, while Groningen takes 15.8.
First-half and second-half trends
Telstar leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.79 goals per game after halftime. Groningen leads at halftime in 25% and scores 0.82 after halftime.
When the teams score
Telstar's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). For Groningen, it is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Eredivisie games average 3.21 goals. Both teams score in 64% of games, and 63% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back a Telstar win because the hosts average 1.71 goals per home match versus Groningen’s 1.21 away, and they have a higher shot conversion rate (13% vs 8%). Telstar is less likely to finish scoreless (14% vs 21%) and has scored 11 goals in the last 5 fixtures, with a points average of 1.8 over that span versus Groningen’s 1.4, favoring the hosts. Groningen, however, has more wins this season (11 vs 6) and a higher league position (10th vs 14th), and defensively they concede fewer xG against (1.42 vs 1.66) and record clean sheets away more often (21% vs 7%). Additionally, Groningen generates slightly higher attacking xG (1.68 vs 1.59) and attempts more shots per game (14.86 vs 13.71), so they cannot be underestimated. Considering this, I assess the probabilities as 45% for the home side, 30% for a draw and 25% for the away team.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
Statistics indicate a BTTS-favorable scenario: Groningen has a seasonal BTTS rate of 57% and 80% in the last 5 matches, while Telstar is 50% seasonally and 60% in the last 5, with the league average at 64%. In their last 5 matches Telstar averaged 2.2 goals scored and 1.4 conceded, Groningen 2.0 scored and 1.4 conceded, which signals frequent goals from both sides. Offensive potential is supported by xG: Telstar xG is 1.8, Groningen 1.68, with xG against 1.21 and 1.42 respectively; additionally shots per game 16.79 vs 14.86 and shots on target 5.36 vs 6.21 indicate chance creation. Clean sheet probability is limited, as Groningen have only 21% clean sheets versus Telstar 36%, and Telstar have conceded 46 goals this season compared to Groningen 37, so a full clean sheet is unlikely. Considering the league 64% BTTS, high recent rates of 60% and 80% and the numbers above, I assess BTTS = 'Yes' as the more likely outcome.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Data analysis indicates clear goal potential: Telstar averages 1.64 goals at home, Groningen 1.21 away, with xG of 1.80 (Telstar) and 1.68 (Groningen). Combined expected goals calculated as the average of attacking xG and opponent defensive xG are 1.61 for the home side and 1.45 for the visitors, totaling approximately 3.06 expected goals. A Poisson model with λ=3.06 yields roughly an 81% probability for >1.5 goals, ~59% for >2.5 and ~37% for >3.5; seasonal rates support this view (Over1.5: Telstar 86%, Groningen 93%; last 5 matches Over2.5: Telstar 100%, Groningen 80%). Considering both the xG/Poisson model and seasonal and form data, the strongest signal is Over 1.5 (I assess an 88% probability), Over 2.5 has moderate support (~63%), while Over 3.5 remains less likely (~37%). Recommendation: play Over 1.5 as the most reliable option, based on expected 1.61 and 1.45 goals for home and away respectively (total 3.06).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is 1/1 (Telstar leads at half and wins). Telstar led at the break in 36% of matches (5 times) versus Groningen only 14% (2 times), and the home side scores an average of 0.79 goals by half-time compared to 0.43 for the visitors, giving them an advantage in the first 45 minutes. Over the full match Telstar averages 1.64 goals scored and concedes 1.00, while Groningen scores 1.21 and concedes 1.64, and Telstar wins 43% of fixtures versus 36% for Groningen. Additionally, in the last five matches Telstar led at the break in 60% of cases and converted those into wins at a 60% rate; after the interval they collect more points (1.57 vs 1.07) and win the second half more often (43% vs 28%). Although a draw at half-time is common (HT draw 50% for Telstar and 64% for Groningen), the hosts' advantage both in HT metrics and in season-long goal difference makes 1/1 the strongest signal.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Telstar | Groningen | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 38% | 37% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.27 | 0.25 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Telstar is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / game - Telstar · 1.4 pts / game - Groningen
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Groningen is 5% better for: goals scored per game.
1.36 goals / game - Telstar · 1.43 goals / game - Groningen
Groningen is 24% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.64 goals / game - Telstar · 1.32 goals / game - Groningen
Telstar scores in 75% of games (21 of 28 meczów), while Groningen keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 meczów).
Groningen scores in 79% of games (22 of 28 meczów), while Telstar keeps a clean sheet in 14% (4 of 28 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Telstar
Over / Under - Groningen
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Groningen is 12% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.18 pts / game - Telstar · 1.32 pts / game - Groningen
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Telstar - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 21%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Groningen - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 39%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.3 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.0 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 40% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 20% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Telstar
Groningen
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Eredivisie).
Teams vs league
| Telstar | Liga | Groningen | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 3.00 | 3.21 | ▼ 2.75 |
| Both teams scored | • 64% | 64% | ▼ 54% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 57% | 63% | ▼ 54% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 14% | 19% | ▲ 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 75% | 82% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 89% | 85% | ▲ 93% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Referee context
See how often this referee shows cards, awards penalties and how their matches tend to finish.
Head-to-head
Record from Telstar's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Groningen. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Telstar vs Groningen?
The Eredivisie match finished Telstar 0:2 Groningen. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Telstar vs Groningen?
Telstar score 1.36 goals per game on average and Groningen 1.43. The Eredivisie average is 3.21 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Telstar's matches and 54% of Groningen's.
What form are Telstar and Groningen in?
Over the last 5 games Telstar have a 3-0-2 record (1.80 points per game) and Groningen 2-1-2 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Telstar vs Groningen?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


