Egypt - Second DivisionData current as of 17 July 2026

Tersana vs Abu Qair Semad: match statistics

Tersana crest
Tersana
0 : 0half-time 0:0
Abu Qair Semad crest
Abu Qair Semad

Tersana vs Abu Qair Semad: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tersana play Abu Qair Semad in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 7 May 2026 at 15:30. Final score: 0:0.

Current form

Tersana: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match. Abu Qair Semad: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tersana scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94 goals per match. Abu Qair Semad scores 1.18 and concedes 0.74. League average: 1.95 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tersana 41%, Abu Qair Semad 41%. Over 2.5: Tersana 26%, Abu Qair Semad 32%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

xG, shots and style

Abu Qair Semad has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.28. Tersana: 8.4 shots per match, Abu Qair Semad: 9.6.

Match halves

Tersana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.38. Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.59.

Goals by minute

Tersana: 0-15 (8 goals). Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.

Head-to-head

1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.

Match description

I back the away win (2): Abu Qair Semad sit 3rd in the table versus Tersana’s 12th, and across the season the visitors have scored 36 and conceded 25, while the hosts have 30 scored and 31 conceded. In their last 5 matches Abu are unbeaten with a 2-3-0 record and 1.8 points per game, whereas Tersana are 2-2-1 averaging 1.6 points per game. Tersana’s home metrics are favorable: home xG 1.46, 5.07 shots on target per match and only 0.94 goals conceded, while Abu away have 1.38 xG, 4.46 shots on target and 1.00 goals conceded. High draw rates (Tersana 38% draws at home, Abu 44% draws away) and a small xG difference (only 0.08) point to an even contest, but Abu’s superior league position and fewer losses this season (6 vs 10) give the visitors the edge. I estimate Abu’s win probability at ~45%, draw 30% and Tersana win 25%.

Half-by-half

0 : 0
1st half
0 : 0
2nd half

Match statistics

43Possession (%)57
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
5Shots5
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0Shots on target2
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.65xG0.92
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
4Corners5
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
45Dangerous attacks63
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
10Fouls26
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0Cards0
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.91Goals scored / match1.18
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.94Goals conceded / match0.74
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
44%Average possession44%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
3.35Shots on target / match4.24
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

8.38Shots per match9.62
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
3.35Shots on target4.24
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
10.9%Shot conversion12.2%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
44%Possession44%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
1.28xG for1.59
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
1.14xG against1
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

Shooting quality

Tersana: BalancedAbu Qair Semad: Counter-attacking
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
Accuracy (shots on target)40%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.17
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.270.28

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Abu Qair Semad is 29% better for: last-5 form.

1.4 pts / match - Tersana · 1.8 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad

Tersana
DWDDD
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
24% W47% R29% P
Season (W-D-L)
8-16-10
1.18 pts / match · goal difference -1
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-4-0
1.40 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
6-7-4
Last 5 at home
2-3-0
DDWWD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.0xG: 0.97Opponent xG: 1.25BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%
Abu Qair Semad
DDWDW
Unbeaten in the last 5 matches
Season result split
44% W38% R18% P
Season (W-D-L)
15-13-6
1.71 pts / match · goal difference +15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-3-0
1.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-8-3
Last 5 away
1-3-1
LWDDD
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 0.4xG: 1.70Opponent xG: 0.64BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Abu Qair Semad is 30% better for: goals scored per match.

0.91 goals / match - Tersana · 1.18 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad

Abu Qair Semad is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.

0.94 goals / match - Tersana · 0.74 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad

Tersana scoring profile: mixed

Tersana scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).

Abu Qair Semad scoring profile: strong

Abu Qair Semad scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).

31Goals scored (season)40
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
32Goals conceded (season)25
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
1.85Average goals in match1.91
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
7Goals scored (last 5)7
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
5Goals conceded (last 5)2
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

How often they score at least...

56%1 goal74%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
21%2 goals26%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
12%3 goals15%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
3%4 goals3%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

How often they concede at least...

65%1 goal53%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
21%2 goals15%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
6%3 goals6%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
3%4 goals0%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

41%
League average

Goal patterns

24%BTTS at half-time18%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
6%BTTS in both halves0%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
18%Scored in both halves18%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

BTTS and goal count

24%Min. 3 goals and BTTS21%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
3%Min. 3 goals without BTTS12%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
80%BTTS - last 540%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

53%Min. 1 goal before half-time59%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
32%Min. 2 goals before half-time21%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
9%Min. 3 goals before half-time0%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

2nd half

59%Min. 1 goal after half-time65%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
21%Min. 2 goals after half-time26%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
6%Min. 3 goals after half-time12%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Abu Qair Semad is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1.24 pts / match - Tersana · 1.47 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad

Tersana - half-time state
18% leading71% draw12% trailing
Abu Qair Semad - half-time state
29% leading59% draw12% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.24Points per match (1st half)1.47
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.53Goals scored (1st half)0.5
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.41Goals conceded (1st half)0.29
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.94Average goals (1st half)0.79
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
65%Clean sheet before half-time71%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
59%No goal before half-time53%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

After half-time (2nd half)

1.06Points per match (2nd half)1.44
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.38Goals scored (2nd half)0.59
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.53Goals conceded (2nd half)0.44
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
0.91Average goals (2nd half)1.03
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
56%Clean sheet after half-time68%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad
68%No goal after half-time59%
TersanaAbu Qair Semad

Tersana - second-half results

18% W53% R29% P
42
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
+4
Goal difference (1st half)
36
Second-half points
-5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding133%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.1

Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Abu Qair Semad - second-half results

35% W38% R26% P
50
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
+7
Goal difference (1st half)
49
Second-half points
+5
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.47
PPG before half-time
Lead holding152%

Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time+0.2

Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.

Tersana - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.400.80
Goals scored / match1.20.2
Goals conceded / match0.60.4
Average goals in match1.80.6
1 goal80%40%
2 goals80%20%
3 goals20%0%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal20%80%
Goal difference+3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 80% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 6
Abu Qair Semad - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.801.60
Goals scored / match0.60.8
Goals conceded / match0.20.2
Average goals in match0.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet80%80%
No goal40%60%
Goal difference+2+3
Half-time: 40% leading - 60% draw - 0% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 40% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tersana
ScoredConceded
8
2
0-15
3
6
16-30
7
6
31-45
3
3
46-60
2
4
61-75
8
11
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.

Abu Qair Semad
ScoredConceded
8
3
0-15
8
2
16-30
4
5
31-45
6
6
46-60
6
3
61-75
8
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

1.89
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
0.8 : 1.1
Estimated goal split
home : away
97%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
41%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-100%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
41%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
11%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 9 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tersana

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.14
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.17
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.4 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.37
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.20
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
88%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
102%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.22
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 26% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

Abu Qair Semad

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.59
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.15
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-15.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.41
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.26
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
128%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
71%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
+0.09
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
20% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 20% come in the first quarter-hour.
20%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).

Teams vs league

TersanaLigaAbu Qair Semad
Average goals in match 1.851.95 1.91
Both teams scored 41%41% 41%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 26%32% 32%
Clean sheets 35%38% 47%
Goal before half-time 53%53% 59%
Goal after half-time 59%67% 65%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

1.95
Average goals per match
41%
Both teams scored
32%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
38%
Clean sheets
1.04
Home goals / match
0.92
Away goals / match
+13%
Home attack advantage
+12%
Home defence advantage
+4%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
53%
1 goal
19%
2 goals
5%
3 goals
0%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
67%
1 goal
30%
2 goals
9%
3 goals
3%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Previous meeting: Tersana 0 - 1 - 0 Abu Qair Semad. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.

FAQ

What was the result of Tersana vs Abu Qair Semad?

The Second Division match finished Tersana 0:0 Abu Qair Semad. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Tersana vs Abu Qair Semad?

Tersana score 0.91 goals per game on average and Abu Qair Semad 1.18. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Tersana's matches and 41% of Abu Qair Semad's.

What form are Tersana and Abu Qair Semad in?

Over the last 5 games Tersana have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Abu Qair Semad 2-3-0 (1.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tersana vs Abu Qair Semad?

The statistical background for Tersana vs Abu Qair Semad — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.