Abu Qair Semad vs Tersana: match statistics
Abu Qair Semad vs Tersana: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Abu Qair Semad play Tersana in Second Division (Egypt). The match date is 17 December 2025 at 13:30. Final score: 0:0.
Current form
Abu Qair Semad: 2-3-0, 1.80 points/match. Tersana: 1-4-0, 1.40 points/match.
Goal statistics
Abu Qair Semad scores 1.18 and concedes 0.74 goals per match. Tersana scores 0.91 and concedes 0.94. League average: 1.95 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Abu Qair Semad 41%, Tersana 41%. Over 2.5: Abu Qair Semad 32%, Tersana 26%. League level: BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
xG, shots and style
Abu Qair Semad has higher xG: 1.59 vs 1.28. Abu Qair Semad: 9.6 shots per match, Tersana: 8.4.
Match halves
Abu Qair Semad: half-time lead 29%, second-half goals 0.59. Tersana: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.38.
Goals by minute
Abu Qair Semad: 0-15 (8 goals). Tersana: 0-15 (8 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Second Division: 1.95 goals per match, BTTS 41%, Over 2.5 32%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-1-0. Average goals 0.00, BTTS 0%.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Abu Qair Semad | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 44% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.17 | 0.15 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.28 | 0.27 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Abu Qair Semad is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.8 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.4 pts / match - Tersana
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Abu Qair Semad is 30% better for: goals scored per match.
1.18 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 0.91 goals / match - Tersana
Abu Qair Semad is 27% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.74 goals / match - Abu Qair Semad · 0.94 goals / match - Tersana
Abu Qair Semad scores in 74% of matches (25 of 34 matches), while Tersana keeps a clean sheet in 35% (12 of 34 matches).
Tersana scores in 56% of matches (19 of 34 matches), while Abu Qair Semad keeps a clean sheet in 47% (16 of 34 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Abu Qair Semad
Over / Under — Tersana
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Abu Qair Semad is 19% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.47 pts / match - Abu Qair Semad · 1.24 pts / match - Tersana
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Abu Qair Semad - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 29% of matches and wins 44%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Tersana - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 24%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.80 | 1.60 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Average goals in match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +2 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 0.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 1.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| Average goals in match | 1.8 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 20% | 80% |
| Goal difference | +3 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +2 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 0-15 (8 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Abu Qair Semad
Tersana
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Second Division).
Teams vs league
| Abu Qair Semad | Liga | Tersana | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 1.91 | 1.95 | • 1.85 |
| Both teams scored | • 41% | 41% | • 41% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 32% | 32% | ▼ 26% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 47% | 38% | ▼ 35% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 59% | 53% | • 53% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 65% | 67% | ▼ 59% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Abu Qair Semad 0 - 1 - 0 Tersana. Average goals 0.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Abu Qair Semad vs Tersana?
The Second Division match finished Abu Qair Semad 0:0 Tersana. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Abu Qair Semad vs Tersana?
Abu Qair Semad score 1.18 goals per game on average and Tersana 0.91. The Second Division average is 1.95 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 32% of games. Both teams score in 41% of Abu Qair Semad's matches and 41% of Tersana's.
What form are Abu Qair Semad and Tersana in?
Over the last 5 games Abu Qair Semad have a 2-3-0 record (1.80 points per game) and Tersana 1-4-0 (1.40 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Abu Qair Semad vs Tersana?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.