The Strongest vs ABB: match statistics
The Strongest vs ABB: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
The Strongest play ABB in LFPB (Bolivia). The match date is 3 May 2026 at 23:15. Final score: 3:1.
Current form
The Strongest: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. ABB: 2-0-3, 1.20 points/match.
Goal statistics
The Strongest scores 1.67 and concedes 0.89 goals per match. ABB scores 1.63 and concedes 2.50. League average: 3.08 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: The Strongest 67%, ABB 88%. Over 2.5: The Strongest 56%, ABB 88%. League level: BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 63%.
xG, shots and style
ABB has higher xG: 1.67 vs 1.66. The Strongest: 16.4 shots per match, ABB: 16.0.
Match halves
The Strongest: half-time lead 22%, second-half goals 0.89. ABB: half-time lead 13%, second-half goals 1.00.
Goals by minute
The Strongest: 76-90+ (5 goals). ABB: 16-30 (3 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
LFPB: 3.08 goals per match, BTTS 66%, Over 2.5 63%.
Head-to-head
2 H2H matches: 2-0-0. Average goals 4.00, BTTS 100%.
Match description
I predict a home win (1). The Strongest average 3 goals scored and 2 conceded per home match, possess 57% possession and average 8 shots on target, while ABB on the road average 2 goals scored, concede 3 and register 5.5 shots on target with 44% possession. Home efficiency is confirmed by a higher conversion rate of 17% versus ABB’s 11% and a superior xG 1.90 vs 1.84, while The Strongest also allow a lower xG against (1.56 vs 1.92), indicating better quality of created and limited chances. In the last 5 matches the hosts scored 8 goals and average 2.0 points per game, whereas ABB scored 9 but conceded 13 and average only 1.2 points per game, highlighting the visitors’ defensive weakness. Considering a 100% home win rate in local data and advantages in possession, shots and conversion, I assess the probabilities as 65% for The Strongest, 20% for a draw and 15% for ABB.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| The Strongest | ABB | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.31 | 0.30 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
The Strongest is 83% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - The Strongest · 1.2 pts / match - ABB
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
The Strongest is 181% better for: goals conceded per match.
0.89 goals / match - The Strongest · 2.5 goals / match - ABB
The Strongest scores in 78% of matches (7 of 9 matches), while ABB keeps a clean sheet in 0% (0 of 8 matches).
ABB scores in 88% of matches (7 of 8 matches), while The Strongest keeps a clean sheet in 33% (3 of 9 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — The Strongest
Over / Under — ABB
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
The Strongest is 77% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.33 pts / match - The Strongest · 0.75 pts / match - ABB
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
The Strongest - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 22% of matches and wins 67%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
ABB - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 13% of matches and wins 38%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Defence stays stable across the full match.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.40 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Average goals in match | 1.4 | 0.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 40% |
| 2 goals | 60% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 100% |
| No goal | 20% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 0.60 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Average goals in match | 2.0 | 2.2 |
| 1 goal | 100% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 80% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 0% | 20% |
| No goal | 20% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (3 goli). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
The Strongest
ABB
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (LFPB).
Teams vs league
| The Strongest | Liga | ABB | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | ▼ 2.56 | 3.08 | ▲ 4.13 |
| Both teams scored | • 67% | 66% | ▲ 88% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 56% | 63% | ▲ 88% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 20% | ▼ 0% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 78% | 72% | ▲ 100% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 56% | 87% | ▲ 100% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Recent meetings (2): The Strongest 2 - 0 - 0 ABB. Average goals 4.00, both teams scored in 100% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of The Strongest vs ABB?
The LFPB match finished The Strongest 3:1 ABB. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between The Strongest and ABB?
In the last 2 head-to-head matches The Strongest won 2, ABB won 0 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 4.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before The Strongest vs ABB?
The Strongest score 1.67 goals per game on average and ABB 1.63. The LFPB average is 3.08 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 63% of games. Both teams score in 67% of The Strongest's matches and 88% of ABB's.
What form are The Strongest and ABB in?
Over the last 5 games The Strongest have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and ABB 2-0-3 (1.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for The Strongest vs ABB?
The statistical background for The Strongest vs ABB — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.