Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildÞórsvöllurData current as of October 17, 2026

Thór vs FH: match statistics

Thór crest
Thór
1 : 0half-time 0:0
FH crest
FH

Thór vs FH: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Thór played against FH in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Venue: Þórsvöllur. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Thór has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. FH has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Thór scores 1.00 goals per game and allows 2.38. FH scores 1.29 and allows 1.81. Games in this league average 3.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 52% of Thór's games and 67% of FH's. The Over 2.5 rates are 57% and 52%, compared with league averages of 71% for BTTS and 69% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

FH has the higher season xG average, 1.68 to 1.20 per game. Thór takes 10.9 shots per game, while FH takes 13.8.

First-half and second-half trends

Thór leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.62 goals per game after halftime. FH leads at halftime in 29% and scores 0.52 after halftime.

When the teams score

Thór's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For FH, it is minutes 31-45+ (8 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 3.88 goals. Both teams score in 71% of games, and 69% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 2.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

FH come into this match in noticeably more stable form: they have collected 8 points from their last 5 matches, with 2 wins, 2 draws and just 1 defeat, while Thór have lost 3 times and scored only 4 goals. The visitors create slightly more chances away from home, averaging 12.4 shots and 4.2 on target per match compared with Thór’s 10.9 and 3.4, while their average xG stands at 1.44 versus 1.21 for the hosts. Both defenses are prone to mistakes, with Thór conceding 2.0 goals per home match and FH 2.1 away from home, alongside xG against figures of 2.07 and 2.16 respectively. The hosts have lost as many as 60% of their home matches, while FH draw 40% of their away fixtures, so a closely contested game is possible. However, the visitors’ superior current efficiency and form give them a slight edge.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Seasonal BTTS indicators point towards both teams scoring: Thór has seen this outcome in 73% of matches, while FH stands at 60%, against a league average of 71%. Both defenses are vulnerable, with Thór conceding an average of 1.55 goals and FH as many as 2.10, while their average xG conceded to opponents is 1.90 and 2.16, respectively. Thór generates an average of 1.90 xG and records 5.45 shots on target per match, which should be enough to exploit FH’s defensive weaknesses. The risk to the pick is the hosts’ current form: they have scored only 4 goals in their last 5 matches, with BTTS landing in just 20% of those games. Nevertheless, FH has recorded an 80% BTTS rate in its last 5 league matches and concedes an average of 2.27 xG, so the both-teams-to-score scenario remains more likely.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

The Over 1.5 goals line is strongly supported by seasonal data: at least two goals were scored in 82% of Thór’s matches and 80% of FH’s games. FH’s defense concedes an average of 2.10 goals per match, while Thór allows opponents an xG of 1.90, creating favorable conditions for chances at both ends. The hosts generate an average of 1.90 xG, compared with the 2.16 xG conceded by FH, while FH produces 1.44 xG against 1.90 xG allowed by Thór. Thór’s recent form has been weaker in attack, averaging 0.8 goals across their last five matches, but FH scored 1.4 goals per game during this period, and neither team provides grounds to expect a goalless draw. The projected total of 2.75 goals gives a clear edge to Over 1.5, although the 2.5 line remains considerably more balanced.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Thór has a clearly stronger first-half profile: they led at the break in 36% of their matches, while FH were trailing at half-time in as many as 50% of their games. The hosts average 0.91 goals scored and 0.64 conceded before the interval, whereas FH score just 0.60 goals away from home and allow 1.30. Thór’s advantage is also evident in the quality of chances created, with their average xG standing at 1.90 compared with FH’s 1.44, while the visitors concede as much as 2.16 xG on average. However, FH come into this fixture in better short-term form, averaging 1.4 goals scored over their last five matches compared with Thór’s 0.8, which reduces confidence in backing a high-margin home win. The most likely scenario therefore remains one in which Thór exploit FH’s early vulnerability and hold on to a narrow lead until the final whistle.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 0
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

43Possession (%)57
ThórFH
21Shots12
ThórFH
5Shots on target4
ThórFH
2.11xG1.29
ThórFH
5Corners7
ThórFH
61Dangerous attacks36
ThórFH
7Fouls21
ThórFH
0Cards5
ThórFH

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1Goals scored / game1.29
ThórFH
2.38Goals allowed / game1.81
ThórFH
41%Average possession44%
ThórFH
3.29Shots on target / game4.86
ThórFH

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

10.9Shots per game13.81
ThórFH
3.29Shots on target4.86
ThórFH
9.2%Shot conversion9.3%
ThórFH
41%Possession44%
ThórFH
1.2xG for1.68
ThórFH
2.17xG against2.02
ThórFH

Shooting quality

Thór: BalancedFH: Balanced
ThórFH
Accuracy (shots on target)30%35%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.12
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.300.27

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

FH is 33% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Thór · 1.6 pts / game - FH

Thór
WLLLW
Season result split
24% W14% D62% L
Season (W-D-L)
5-3-13
0.86 pts / game · goal difference -29
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-1-6
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
LDWWL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.25Opponent xG: 1.82BTTS: 20%Over 2.5: 20%
FH
DWLDW
Season result split
19% W43% D38% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-9-8
1.00 pts / game · goal difference -11
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
2-4-4
Last 5 away
2-2-1
LWDWD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.59Opponent xG: 2.27BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 40%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

FH is 29% better for: goals scored per game.

1 goals / game - Thór · 1.29 goals / game - FH

FH is 31% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.38 goals / game - Thór · 1.81 goals / game - FH

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 67% of games (14 of 21 games), while FH keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 games).

FH scoring profile: very strong

FH scores in 76% of games (16 of 21 games), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 19% (4 of 21 games).

21Goals scored (season)27
ThórFH
50Goals conceded (season)38
ThórFH
3.38Average goals per game3.1
ThórFH
4Goals scored (last 5)7
ThórFH
8Goals conceded (last 5)7
ThórFH

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal76%
ThórFH
29%2 goals43%
ThórFH
5%3 goals10%
ThórFH
0%4 goals0%
ThórFH

How often they concede at least...

81%1 goal81%
ThórFH
57%2 goals43%
ThórFH
43%3 goals33%
ThórFH
33%4 goals19%
ThórFH

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

14%BTTS at half-time29%
ThórFH
0%BTTS in both halves10%
ThórFH
5%Scored in both halves14%
ThórFH

BTTS and goal count

48%Min. 3 goals and BTTS43%
ThórFH
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS10%
ThórFH
20%BTTS - last 580%
ThórFH

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

81%Min. 1 goal before half-time76%
ThórFH
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time48%
ThórFH
24%Min. 3 goals before half-time24%
ThórFH

2nd half

81%Min. 1 goal after half-time76%
ThórFH
52%Min. 2 goals after half-time33%
ThórFH
38%Min. 3 goals after half-time24%
ThórFH

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

FH is 53% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.81 pts / game - Thór · 1.24 pts / game - FH

Thór - half-time state
19% leading24% draw57% trailing
FH - half-time state
29% leading38% draw33% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.81Points per game (1st half)1.24
ThórFH
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.76
ThórFH
1.1Goals conceded (1st half)0.95
ThórFH
1.48Average goals (1st half)1.71
ThórFH
33%Clean sheet before half-time48%
ThórFH
71%No goal before half-time48%
ThórFH

After half-time (2nd half)

1.05Points per game (2nd half)1.1
ThórFH
0.62Goals scored (2nd half)0.52
ThórFH
1.29Goals conceded (2nd half)0.86
ThórFH
1.9Average goals (2nd half)1.38
ThórFH
33%Clean sheet after half-time48%
ThórFH
57%No goal after half-time62%
ThórFH

Thór - second-half results

24% W33% D43% L
17
Half-time points
8
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-14
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.81
PPG before half-time
Lead holding126%

Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 24%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

FH - second-half results

29% W24% D48% L
26
Half-time points
16
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
23
Second-half points
-7
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.24
PPG before half-time
Lead holding66%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 19%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.1

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Thór - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.00
Goals scored / game0.40.4
Goals allowed / game1.00.6
Average goals per game1.41.0
1 goal100%60%
2 goals20%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal60%80%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 40% leading - 0% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 40% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 2
FH - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.001.80
Goals scored / game0.60.8
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.41.4
1 goal80%100%
2 goals40%20%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal40%20%
Goal difference-1+1
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 0% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Thór
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
0
10
16-30
4
8
31-45
2
7
46-60
5
8
61-75
6
12
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -6 - late phases are a weakness.

FH
ScoredConceded
5
6
0-15
3
5
16-30
8
9
31-45
4
5
46-60
4
5
61-75
3
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 31-45 (8 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): -5 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.24
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 1.8
Estimated goal split
home : away
84%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
60%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-38%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
51%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.97
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.41
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+8.6 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.20
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
48%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
132%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.34
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
29% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
29%

FH

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.34
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.18
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-0.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.39
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.21
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
72%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
87%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.60
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
11% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 19% come in the first quarter-hour.
11%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ThórLigaFH
Average goals per game▼ 3.383.88▼ 3.10
Both teams scored▼ 52%71%▼ 67%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 57%69%▼ 52%
Clean sheets▲ 19%16%▲ 19%
Goal before half-time• 81%82%▼ 76%
Goal after half-time▼ 81%86%▼ 76%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.88
Average goals per game
71%
Both teams scored
69%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.09
Home goals / game
1.80
Away goals / game
+16%
Home attack advantage
+14%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
82%
1 goal
52%
2 goals
26%
3 goals
14%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
86%
1 goal
61%
2 goals
39%
3 goals
17%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Thór's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against FH. Games average 2.00 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Thór vs FH?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Thór 1:0 FH. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What do the goal statistics show before Thór vs FH?

Thór score 1.00 goals per game on average and FH 1.29. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 69% of games. Both teams score in 52% of Thór's matches and 67% of FH's.

What form are Thór and FH in?

Over the last 5 games Thór have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and FH 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thór vs FH?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thór vs FH: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.