Iceland - ÚrvalsdeildÞórsvöllurData current as of October 15, 2026

Thór vs ÍBV: match statistics

Thór crest
Thór
1 : 0half-time 1:0
ÍBV crest
ÍBV

Thór vs ÍBV: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Thór played against ÍBV in Úrvalsdeild (Iceland). The game was played on October 10, 2026. Venue: Þórsvöllur. Final score: 1:0.

Recent form

Thór has 2 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.20 points per game. ÍBV has 0 wins, 2 draws and 3 losses, with 0.40 points per game.

Scoring records

Thór scores 0.96 goals per game and allows 2.38. ÍBV scores 1.38 and allows 2.00. Games in this league average 3.88 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 50% of Thór's games and 71% of ÍBV's. The Over 2.5 rates are 58% and 58%, compared with league averages of 72% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

ÍBV has the higher season xG average, 1.49 to 1.23 per game. Thór takes 11.4 shots per game, while ÍBV takes 13.1.

First-half and second-half trends

Thór leads at halftime in 17% of its games and scores 0.58 goals per game after halftime. ÍBV leads at halftime in 21% and scores 0.83 after halftime.

When the teams score

Thór's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For ÍBV, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Úrvalsdeild games average 3.88 goals. Both teams score in 72% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 2 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

Thór have the home advantage, having won 36% of their matches at home, while ÍBV have won just 8% of their away games. The hosts have won 2 of their last 5 matches, scoring 5 goals, while the visitors have failed to win any and have scored only 3. ÍBV’s slight edge is their higher away xG of 1.44, compared with Thór’s 1.29 at home. However, they have failed to keep a clean sheet in any away match and concede an average of 2.17 goals. The hosts’ defense is also a concern, allowing chances worth an average xG of 2.00 per home match, so a draw or an away win remains a realistic possibility. Nevertheless, ÍBV’s poor away finishing, having failed to score in 33% of their away matches, makes Thór moderate favorites.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

Over the course of the season, both teams have frequently featured in matches with goals at both ends: Thór in 75% and ÍBV in 67% of their games. Thór concede an average of 1.83 goals, while ÍBV concede 2.17, and the visitors are yet to keep a clean sheet, increasing the likelihood of the home side scoring. ÍBV also have good reason to find the net: their average xG is 1.44, while Thór keep a clean sheet in just 8% of matches. Recent scoring form tempers this signal: Thór have averaged 1.0 goals and ÍBV 0.6 over their previous five matches, with both teams scoring in only 40% of those games. Therefore, BTTS - Yes remains the more likely outcome, although recent results support only a moderate, rather than strong, preference for this scenario.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

At least two goals were scored in 83% of matches involving either team this season, making Over 1.5 the strongest signal. Thór average 1.50 goals per match, while ÍBV concede 2.17; the hosts also have an average xG of 1.53, compared with 1.84 xG conceded by the visitors. ÍBV, in turn, average 1.25 goals scored, while Thór concede 1.83, giving the visitors a realistic chance of getting on the scoresheet. Recent scoring form supports the more cautious Over 1.5 line rather than Over 2.5: across their last five matches, Thór averaged 1.0 goals, while ÍBV managed just 0.6. A forecast of around 3.25 goals supports backing at least two goals, although both teams’ recent dip in scoring limits confidence in higher lines.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

A draw at half-time is the most likely starting point: Thór were level at the break in 3 of their last 5 matches, while ÍBV failed to score in the first half in 4 of their last 5. The hosts also tend to start cautiously, having failed to score before half-time in 67% of their matches this season. After the break, the advantage shifts to Thór, who average 1.00 second-half goals, compared with ÍBV’s 0.67 goals scored and 1.25 conceded. The case for a home win is further supported by Thór’s higher attacking xG (1.53 versus 1.44) and the visitors’ weaker defense, which allows an average xG of 1.84, compared with 1.33 for Thór. Therefore, a draw at half-time followed by a Thór win is the strongest scenario, although their recent average of 2.2 goals conceded per match tempers confidence in the prediction.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 0
First half
0 : 0
Second half

Game stats

39Possession (%)61
ThórÍBV
11Shots15
ThórÍBV
3Shots on target5
ThórÍBV
1.26xG1.65
ThórÍBV
4Corners5
ThórÍBV
48Dangerous attacks49
ThórÍBV
19Fouls20
ThórÍBV
1Cards6
ThórÍBV

Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

0.96Goals scored / game1.38
ThórÍBV
2.38Goals allowed / game2
ThórÍBV
42%Average possession50%
ThórÍBV
3.29Shots on target / game4.25
ThórÍBV

Team stats— who is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

11.38Shots per game13.08
ThórÍBV
3.29Shots on target4.25
ThórÍBV
8.4%Shot conversion10.5%
ThórÍBV
42%Possession50%
ThórÍBV
1.23xG for1.49
ThórÍBV
2.16xG against1.58
ThórÍBV

Shooting quality

Thór: BalancedÍBV: Balanced
ThórÍBV
Accuracy (shots on target)29%32%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.110.11
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.32

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team form— who is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Thór is 200% better for: last-5 form.

1.2 pts / game - Thór · 0.4 pts / game - ÍBV

Thór
LWWLL
Season result split
25% W13% D63% L
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-15
0.88 pts / game · goal difference -34
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-0-3
1.20 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
4-1-6
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
DWWLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.0Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.34Opponent xG: 2.00BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
ÍBV
LLDLD
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
17% W29% D54% L
Season (W-D-L)
4-7-13
0.79 pts / game · goal difference -15
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-2-3
0.40 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
1-4-7
Last 5 away
0-2-3
LDLDL
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 1.4xG: 1.96Opponent xG: 1.59BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 20%

Goals— how do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

ÍBV is 44% better for: goals scored per game.

0.96 goals / game - Thór · 1.38 goals / game - ÍBV

ÍBV is 19% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.38 goals / game - Thór · 2 goals / game - ÍBV

Thór scoring profile: very strong

Thór scores in 67% of games (16 of 24 games), while ÍBV keeps a clean sheet in 4% (1 of 24 games).

ÍBV scoring profile: very strong

ÍBV scores in 75% of games (18 of 24 games), while Thór keeps a clean sheet in 21% (5 of 24 games).

23Goals scored (season)33
ThórÍBV
57Goals conceded (season)48
ThórÍBV
3.33Average goals per game3.38
ThórÍBV
5Goals scored (last 5)3
ThórÍBV
11Goals conceded (last 5)7
ThórÍBV

How often they score at least...

67%1 goal75%
ThórÍBV
25%2 goals38%
ThórÍBV
4%3 goals8%
ThórÍBV
0%4 goals8%
ThórÍBV

How often they concede at least...

79%1 goal96%
ThórÍBV
58%2 goals58%
ThórÍBV
46%3 goals17%
ThórÍBV
33%4 goals13%
ThórÍBV

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

Goal patterns

17%BTTS at half-time21%
ThórÍBV
0%BTTS in both halves8%
ThórÍBV
4%Scored in both halves21%
ThórÍBV

BTTS and goal count

46%Min. 3 goals and BTTS58%
ThórÍBV
13%Min. 3 goals without BTTS0%
ThórÍBV
40%BTTS - last 540%
ThórÍBV

Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

75%Min. 1 goal before half-time79%
ThórÍBV
38%Min. 2 goals before half-time46%
ThórÍBV
21%Min. 3 goals before half-time17%
ThórÍBV

2nd half

83%Min. 1 goal after half-time83%
ThórÍBV
54%Min. 2 goals after half-time50%
ThórÍBV
42%Min. 3 goals after half-time33%
ThórÍBV

Game halves— when do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

ÍBV is 16% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.83 pts / game - Thór · 0.96 pts / game - ÍBV

Thór - half-time state
17% leading33% draw50% trailing
ÍBV - half-time state
21% leading33% draw46% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.83Points per game (1st half)0.96
ThórÍBV
0.38Goals scored (1st half)0.54
ThórÍBV
1Goals conceded (1st half)0.92
ThórÍBV
1.38Average goals (1st half)1.46
ThórÍBV
38%Clean sheet before half-time38%
ThórÍBV
71%No goal before half-time63%
ThórÍBV

After half-time (2nd half)

1.04Points per game (2nd half)1
ThórÍBV
0.58Goals scored (2nd half)0.83
ThórÍBV
1.38Goals conceded (2nd half)1.08
ThórÍBV
1.96Average goals (2nd half)1.92
ThórÍBV
33%Clean sheet after half-time29%
ThórÍBV
58%No goal after half-time42%
ThórÍBV

Thór - second-half results

25% W29% D46% L
20
Half-time points
9
Half-time goals
-15
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-19
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.83
PPG before half-time
Lead holding147%

Leads at halftime in 17% of games and wins 25%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime+0.4

Allows 0.4 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

ÍBV - second-half results

21% W38% D42% L
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-9
Goal difference (1st half)
24
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.96
PPG before half-time
Lead holding81%

Leads at halftime in 21% of games and wins 17%. Usually protects a halftime lead through the final whistle.

Defense after halftime+0.2

Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.

Thór - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.201.40
Goals scored / game0.40.6
Goals allowed / game0.81.4
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%60%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 60% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 40% won - 20% draw - 40% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2
ÍBV - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.800.80
Goals scored / game0.20.4
Goals allowed / game0.80.6
Average goals per game1.01.0
1 goal80%40%
2 goals20%40%
3 goals0%20%
Clean sheet40%60%
No goal80%60%
Goal difference-3-1
Half-time: 20% leading - 20% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 80% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 1

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Thór
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
1
11
16-30
4
8
31-45
3
8
46-60
5
10
61-75
6
15
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (15). Late-goal balance (76-90): -9 - late phases are a weakness.

ÍBV
ScoredConceded
6
4
0-15
4
10
16-30
3
8
31-45
4
12
46-60
7
6
61-75
9
8
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): +1 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.36
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.5 : 1.9
Estimated goal split
home : away
87%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
61%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-11%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
50%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
8%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 13 matches
0-1
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Thór

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.93
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.49
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+10.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.27
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.22
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
45%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
138%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
+0.32
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.2
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 17% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

ÍBV

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.09
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.53
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.11
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.42
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
93%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.39
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.3
Late goals
27% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 18% come in the first quarter-hour.
27%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League context— is this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Úrvalsdeild).

Teams vs league

ThórLigaÍBV
Average goals per game▼ 3.333.88▼ 3.38
Both teams scored▼ 50%72%• 71%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)▼ 58%70%▼ 58%
Clean sheets▲ 21%16%▼ 4%
Goal before half-time▼ 75%81%▼ 79%
Goal after half-time▼ 83%87%▼ 83%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.88
Average goals per game
72%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
16%
Clean sheets
2.15
Home goals / game
1.72
Away goals / game
+25%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+11%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
81%
1 goal
53%
2 goals
25%
3 goals
13%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
87%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
40%
3 goals
15%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. ÍBVYellow cardMilan Tomić
  2. ThórYellow cardEinar Freyr Halldórsson
  3. ÍBVSubstitutionOn: Sesar Örn HarðarsonOff: Aron Lucas Vokes
  4. ÍBVYellow cardFelix Örn Fridriksson
  5. ÍBVSubstitutionOn: Omar SoweOff: Róbert Elís Hlynsson
  6. ÍBVSubstitutionOn: Eidur Atli RúnarssonOff: Milan Tomić
  7. ÍBVYellow cardEidur Atli Rúnarsson

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Thór's perspective: 1 win, 0 draws and 1 loss against ÍBV. Games average 3.00 goals, and both teams scored in 50% of them.

FAQ

What was the result of Thór vs ÍBV?

The Úrvalsdeild match finished Thór 1:0 ÍBV. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Thór and ÍBV?

In the last 2 head-to-head matches Thór won 1, ÍBV won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 3.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 50% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Thór vs ÍBV?

Thór score 0.96 goals per game on average and ÍBV 1.38. The Úrvalsdeild average is 3.88 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Thór's matches and 71% of ÍBV's.

What form are Thór and ÍBV in?

Over the last 5 games Thór have a 2-0-3 record (1.20 points per game) and ÍBV 0-2-3 (0.40 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Thór vs ÍBV?

Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Thór vs ÍBV: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.