Tianjin Teda vs Beijing Guoan: match statistics
Tianjin Teda vs Beijing Guoan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tianjin Teda played against Beijing Guoan in Chinese Super League (China). The game was played on August 15, 2026. Venue: Tianjin Olympic Center Stadium. Final score: 2:4.
Recent form
Tianjin Teda has 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.40 points per game. Beijing Guoan has 3 wins, 2 draws and 0 losses, with 2.20 points per game.
Scoring records
Tianjin Teda scores 1.43 goals per game and allows 1.24. Beijing Guoan scores 1.81 and allows 1.29. Games in this league average 3.03 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 57% of Tianjin Teda's games and 67% of Beijing Guoan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 52% and 62%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 58% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Beijing Guoan has the higher season xG average, 1.79 to 1.11 per game. Tianjin Teda takes 10.3 shots per game, while Beijing Guoan takes 16.1.
First-half and second-half trends
Tianjin Teda leads at halftime in 29% of its games and scores 0.95 goals per game after halftime. Beijing Guoan leads at halftime in 33% and scores 1.24 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tianjin Teda's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (15 goals). For Beijing Guoan, it is minutes 76-90+ (10 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Chinese Super League games average 3.03 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 58% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 2 draws and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Beijing Guoan have a clear edge in the quality of chances created away from home, with an average xG of 1.57 compared with Tianjin Teda’s 1.13 at home. The visitors also register more shots on target (5.0 per match versus 3.3 for the hosts) and retain possession for longer, averaging 60% compared with their opponents’ 47%. However, Tianjin are in excellent recent form, having won 4 of their last 5 matches and conceded only 4 goals during that run, meaning their home advantage limits the extent of the visitors’ superiority. Beijing remain unbeaten in their last five matches, recording 3 wins and 2 draws while scoring 11 goals, and they lose just 22% of their away fixtures. Beijing’s high 44% draw rate away from home increases the likelihood of a share of the points, but their greater control of the game and stronger attacking numbers marginally point towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The “Yes” selection is supported by a seasonal BTTS rate of 67% for Tianjin Teda and an identical 67% for Beijing Guoan, both above the league average of 63%. The hosts average 2.00 goals with an xG of 1.95, while the visitors average 1.56 goals with an xG of 1.57, meaning both teams consistently create chances of sufficient quality to score. Tianjin averages 18.42 shots and 5.67 shots on target per match, while Beijing records 12.89 attempts and 5.00 on target, strengthening the prospect of goals at both ends. In their last five matches, Beijing had BTTS in 80% of games, with both teams scoring 2.2 goals per match; although Tianjin conceded only 0.8 goals during this period, the visitors’ attacking potential points to them breaking through this defense.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Tianjin score an average of 2.00 goals per match, while Beijing average 1.56, against a league average of 3.04 goals. In their last five matches, both teams scored 2.2 goals per game, netting 11 goals each in total. The Over 1.5 line was covered in 92% of Tianjin’s matches and 78% of Beijing’s, providing very strong support for at least two goals. The hosts generate 1.95 xG, while the visitors produce 1.57, with both defenses conceding more than a goal per match on average: 1.25 and 1.33 respectively. Over 1.5 offers the strongest edge, while caution is warranted on the 3.5 line, as only 33% of matches involving either team exceeded four goals.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
A draw at half-time is the most likely outcome, as Beijing Guoan were level at the break in 67% of their matches, compared with 42% for Tianjin Teda. The first halves of both teams are typically cautious: the hosts average 0.75 goals in the opening 45 minutes, while the visitors average just 0.33, and they keep a clean sheet before half-time in 75% and 78% of matches, respectively. After the break, the advantage should shift towards Tianjin, who average 1.25 goals in second halves and as many as 1.8 over their last five matches, while conceding just 0.6. The hosts also have a higher season-long xG, 1.95 compared with 1.57, as well as a clear advantage in shots attempted, 18.42 to 12.89. The X/1 scenario is further supported by Tianjin’s form: they have won four of their last five matches and averaged 2.4 points per match in their second halves.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tianjin Teda | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 34% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.43 | 0.34 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tianjin Teda is 9% better for: last-5 form.
2.4 pts / game - Tianjin Teda · 2.2 pts / game - Beijing Guoan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Beijing Guoan is 27% better for: goals scored per game.
1.43 goals / game - Tianjin Teda · 1.81 goals / game - Beijing Guoan
Tianjin Teda scores in 81% of games (17 of 21 games), while Beijing Guoan keeps a clean sheet in 33% (7 of 21 games).
Beijing Guoan scores in 95% of games (20 of 21 games), while Tianjin Teda keeps a clean sheet in 29% (6 of 21 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tianjin Teda
Over / Under - Beijing Guoan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Beijing Guoan is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.43 pts / game - Tianjin Teda · 1.52 pts / game - Beijing Guoan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tianjin Teda - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 33%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Beijing Guoan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 33% of games and wins 43%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 2.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 2.4 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +6 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.80 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 60% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 20% |
| Goal difference | +3 | +4 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (15 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +4 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tianjin Teda
Beijing Guoan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Chinese Super League).
Teams vs league
| Tianjin Teda | Liga | Beijing Guoan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.67 | 3.03 | • 3.10 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 57% | 63% | ▲ 67% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 52% | 58% | ▲ 62% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 29% | 21% | ▲ 33% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 57% | 70% | ▼ 57% |
| Goal after half-time | • 86% | 87% | ▲ 95% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tianjin Teda's perspective: 1 win, 2 draws and 0 losses against Beijing Guoan. Games average 4.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tianjin Teda vs Beijing Guoan?
The Chinese Super League match finished Tianjin Teda 2:4 Beijing Guoan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tianjin Teda and Beijing Guoan?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches Tianjin Teda won 1, Beijing Guoan won 0 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 4.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tianjin Teda vs Beijing Guoan?
Tianjin Teda score 1.43 goals per game on average and Beijing Guoan 1.81. The Chinese Super League average is 3.03 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 58% of games. Both teams score in 57% of Tianjin Teda's matches and 67% of Beijing Guoan's.
What form are Tianjin Teda and Beijing Guoan in?
Over the last 5 games Tianjin Teda have a 4-0-1 record (2.40 points per game) and Beijing Guoan 3-2-0 (2.20 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tianjin Teda vs Beijing Guoan?
The statistical background for Tianjin Teda vs Beijing Guoan — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.


