Tractor Sazi vs Mes Rafsanjan: match statistics
Tractor Sazi presents decidedly better form and home statistics, sitting in 5th place in the table with a record of 5 wins, 9 draws, and just 2 losses. The hosts demonstrate impressive offensive efficiency in home matches (averaging 2.22 xG) and a solid defense (averaging 0.63 goals conceded), translating to a positive goal difference of +5. Mes Rafsanjan is ranked 16th with a catastrophic away record—0 wins, 75% losses, and a goal difference of -9. The visitors average merely 0.5 goals scored against 1.63 conceded in away games, and their away form (llllddll) is exceptionally poor. Significant advantages in possession (64% vs 43%), shot efficiency, and expected goals clearly favor the hosts, who should confidently win this match.
Tractor Sazi vs Mes Rafsanjan: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tractor Sazi played against Mes Rafsanjan in Persian Gulf Pro League (Iran). The game was played on January 22, 2026. Final score: 4:1.
Recent form
Tractor Sazi has 1 win, 4 draws and 0 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Mes Rafsanjan has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses, with 0.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Tractor Sazi scores 1.13 goals per game and allows 0.50. Mes Rafsanjan scores 0.63 and allows 1.31. Games in this league average 1.70 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 38% of Tractor Sazi's games and 31% of Mes Rafsanjan's. The Over 2.5 rates are 38% and 31%, compared with league averages of 37% for BTTS and 25% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Tractor Sazi has the higher season xG average, 1.81 to 0.87 per game. Tractor Sazi takes 3.6 shots per game, while Mes Rafsanjan takes 0.0.
First-half and second-half trends
Tractor Sazi leads at halftime in 19% of its games and scores 0.69 goals per game after halftime. Mes Rafsanjan leads at halftime in 6% and scores 0.31 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tractor Sazi's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (4 goals). For Mes Rafsanjan, it is minutes 76-90+ (3 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
Persian Gulf Pro League games average 1.70 goals. Both teams score in 37% of games, and 25% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, one previous meeting was available. The record was 0 home wins, 1 draw and 0 away wins. Those games averaged 0.00 goals, with both teams scoring in 0% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tractor Sazi presents decidedly better form and home statistics, sitting in 5th place in the table with a record of 5 wins, 9 draws, and just 2 losses. The hosts demonstrate impressive offensive efficiency in home matches (averaging 2.22 xG) and a solid defense (averaging 0.63 goals conceded), translating to a positive goal difference of +5. Mes Rafsanjan is ranked 16th with a catastrophic away record—0 wins, 75% losses, and a goal difference of -9. The visitors average merely 0.5 goals scored against 1.63 conceded in away games, and their away form (llllddll) is exceptionally poor. Significant advantages in possession (64% vs 43%), shot efficiency, and expected goals clearly favor the hosts, who should confidently win this match.
View the statistical overviewStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tractor Sazi | Mes Rafsanjan | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 41% | 0% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.50 | 0.00 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.75 | 0.00 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tractor Sazi is 75% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Tractor Sazi · 0.8 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Tractor Sazi is 79% better for: goals scored per game.
1.13 goals / game - Tractor Sazi · 0.63 goals / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Tractor Sazi is 162% better for: goals allowed per game.
0.5 goals / game - Tractor Sazi · 1.31 goals / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Tractor Sazi scores in 44% of games (7 of 16 meczów), while Mes Rafsanjan keeps a clean sheet in 31% (5 of 16 meczów).
Mes Rafsanjan scores in 38% of games (6 of 16 meczów), while Tractor Sazi keeps a clean sheet in 56% (9 of 16 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tractor Sazi
Over / Under - Mes Rafsanjan
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tractor Sazi is 84% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.38 pts / game - Tractor Sazi · 0.75 pts / game - Mes Rafsanjan
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tractor Sazi - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 19% of games and wins 31%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.1 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Mes Rafsanjan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 6% of games and wins 13%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.00 | 1.40 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Average goals per game | 0.4 | 0.2 |
| 1 goal | 20% | 20% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 0% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 100% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +1 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 0.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.2 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 40% |
| No goal | 80% | 80% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (4 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (2). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (3 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tractor Sazi
Mes Rafsanjan
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Persian Gulf Pro League).
Teams vs league
| Tractor Sazi | Liga | Mes Rafsanjan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | • 1.63 | 1.70 | ▲ 1.94 |
| Both teams scored | • 38% | 37% | ▼ 31% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 38% | 25% | ▲ 31% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 56% | 43% | ▼ 31% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 31% | 53% | ▲ 63% |
| Goal after half-time | ▼ 50% | 59% | ▲ 63% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Away team
Other recorded players
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tractor Sazi's perspective: 0 wins, 1 draw and 0 losses against Mes Rafsanjan. Games average 0.00 goals, and both teams scored in 0% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tractor Sazi vs Mes Rafsanjan?
The Persian Gulf Pro League match finished Tractor Sazi 4:1 Mes Rafsanjan. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tractor Sazi vs Mes Rafsanjan?
Tractor Sazi score 1.13 goals per game on average and Mes Rafsanjan 0.63. The Persian Gulf Pro League average is 1.70 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 25% of games. Both teams score in 38% of Tractor Sazi's matches and 31% of Mes Rafsanjan's.
What form are Tractor Sazi and Mes Rafsanjan in?
Over the last 5 games Tractor Sazi have a 1-4-0 record (1.40 points per game) and Mes Rafsanjan 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tractor Sazi vs Mes Rafsanjan?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.