TransINVEST Vilnius vs Sūduva: match statistics
TransINVEST Vilnius vs Sūduva: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
TransINVEST Vilnius played against Sūduva in A Lyga (Lithuania). The game was played on September 6, 2026. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
TransINVEST Vilnius has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Sūduva has 5 wins, 0 draws and 0 losses, with 3.00 points per game.
Scoring records
TransINVEST Vilnius scores 1.63 goals per game and allows 1.19. Sūduva scores 1.65 and allows 0.69. Games in this league average 2.64 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 59% of TransINVEST Vilnius's games and 50% of Sūduva's. The Over 2.5 rates are 67% and 50%, compared with league averages of 48% for BTTS and 53% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Sūduva has the higher season xG average, 1.52 to 1.41 per game. TransINVEST Vilnius takes 12.0 shots per game, while Sūduva takes 12.5.
First-half and second-half trends
TransINVEST Vilnius leads at halftime in 44% of its games and scores 0.85 goals per game after halftime. Sūduva leads at halftime in 35% and scores 1.00 after halftime.
When the teams score
TransINVEST Vilnius's most productive scoring window is minutes 61-75 (10 goals). For Sūduva, it is minutes 76-90+ (13 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
A Lyga games average 2.64 goals. Both teams score in 48% of games, and 53% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 2 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Sūduva enters the match as league leaders and is in excellent form: they have won all of their last 5 matches, scoring 14 goals and conceding just 2. The visitors have also been clearly more solid throughout the season, suffering only 3 defeats and conceding 18 goals, compared with TransINVEST Vilnius’ 8 losses and 32 goals conceded. Away from home, Sūduva creates more high-quality chances, averaging 1.57 xG and 5.69 shots on target per match, compared with the hosts’ 1.43 xG and 3.54 shots on target at home. TransINVEST has a decent record in their last five matches, with 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 defeat, but their average of 1.31 goals scored at home may not be enough against a team conceding only 0.92 goals per away match. Home advantage and 46% of home matches ending with a clean sheet keep the draw as a realistic possibility, but Sūduva’s current form and greater attacking efficiency point towards an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The stronger signal points to BTTS - No, as TransINVEST Vilnius keep a clean sheet in 62% of their matches and concede only 0.46 goals per game on average. Sūduva are in very good attacking form, averaging 2.8 goals over their last 5 matches, but during the same period the hosts allowed opponents just 0.8 goals and recorded an xG of 0.78. Sūduva’s current defense is equally strong: they have conceded 2 goals in their last five appearances, or 0.4 per match, with opponents averaging an xG of 0.95. The historical rate of matches in which both sides score is 38% for TransINVEST and 62% for Sūduva, but it has dropped to 40% across the teams’ last five matches. The most likely scenario is therefore that at least one team will fail to score, although Sūduva’s good finishing limits the strength of this angle.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
The strongest signal points to Under 3.5 goals: this total occurred in 77% of TransINVEST matches and as many as 92% of Sūduva’s matches this season. The hosts concede an average of just 0.46 goals, while Sūduva concede 0.92, with neither team having allowed more than two goals in a single match this season. However, the attacking potential remains sufficient for 2–3 goals, as the average xG stands at 1.47 for TransINVEST and 1.57 for Sūduva, while the visitors have scored 14 goals in their last five matches. Both defenses are currently in good form: TransINVEST have conceded 4 goals in their last five appearances, while Sūduva have conceded only 2. The projected total of 2.45 goals favors a low-scoring outcome but does not provide an equally clear edge on the 2.5 line, making Under 3.5 the best choice.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The strongest scenario is a draw at half-time followed by a Sūduva win at the final whistle (X/2). TransINVEST were level at the break in 9 of their 13 home matches, or 69% of the time, and conceded just 0.15 goals per game in the first half, which supports a cautious opening. Sūduva, however, are enjoying an excellent run of five consecutive wins, averaging 2.8 goals scored and just 0.4 conceded over their last five matches. The visitors are particularly effective after the break, averaging 1.6 goals in the second half across their last five games, compared with 1.0 for the hosts. TransINVEST’s season-long defensive advantage, with 0.46 goals conceded per game and clean sheets in 62% of matches, reduces the likelihood of Sūduva taking an early lead, but the visitors’ current form points to a decision in the second half.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 40% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.40 | 0.33 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Sūduva is 50% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 3 pts / game - Sūduva
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Sūduva is 72% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.19 goals / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 0.69 goals / game - Sūduva
TransINVEST Vilnius scores in 85% of games (23 of 27 games), while Sūduva keeps a clean sheet in 46% (12 of 26 games).
Sūduva scores in 77% of games (20 of 26 games), while TransINVEST Vilnius keeps a clean sheet in 33% (9 of 27 games).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - TransINVEST Vilnius
Over / Under - Sūduva
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
TransINVEST Vilnius is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.67 pts / game - TransINVEST Vilnius · 1.58 pts / game - Sūduva
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
TransINVEST Vilnius - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 44% of games and wins 48%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Sūduva - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 35% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 1.0 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 20% |
| Goal difference | 0 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 2.20 | 2.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.0 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 80% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 100% | 60% |
| No goal | 40% | 0% |
| Goal difference | +6 | +6 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 61-75 (10 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (13 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
TransINVEST Vilnius
Sūduva
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (A Lyga).
Teams vs league
| TransINVEST Vilnius | Liga | Sūduva | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.81 | 2.64 | ▼ 2.35 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 59% | 48% | ▲ 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 67% | 53% | ▼ 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 31% | ▲ 46% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 81% | 71% | ▼ 58% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 77% | ▼ 73% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from TransINVEST Vilnius's perspective: 0 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss against Sūduva. Games average 1.33 goals, and both teams scored in 33% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of TransINVEST Vilnius vs Sūduva?
The A Lyga match finished TransINVEST Vilnius 1:2 Sūduva. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between TransINVEST Vilnius and Sūduva?
In the last 3 head-to-head matches TransINVEST Vilnius won 0, Sūduva won 1 and 2 ended level. These games averaged 1.33 goals, with both teams scoring in 33% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before TransINVEST Vilnius vs Sūduva?
TransINVEST Vilnius score 1.63 goals per game on average and Sūduva 1.65. The A Lyga average is 2.64 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 53% of games. Both teams score in 59% of TransINVEST Vilnius's matches and 50% of Sūduva's.
What form are TransINVEST Vilnius and Sūduva in?
Over the last 5 games TransINVEST Vilnius have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Sūduva 5-0-0 (3.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Sūduva?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for TransINVEST Vilnius vs Sūduva: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.