Latvia - 1. LigaData current as of September 20, 2026

Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts: match statistics

Tukums II crest
Tukums II
1 : 1half-time 0:1
JDFS Alberts crest
JDFS Alberts

Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tukums II played against JDFS Alberts in 1. Liga (Latvia). The game was played on August 3, 2026. Final score: 1:1.

Recent form

Tukums II has 1 win, 0 draws and 4 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.60 points per game. JDFS Alberts has 2 wins, 2 draws and 1 loss, with 1.60 points per game.

Scoring records

Tukums II scores 1.29 goals per game and allows 2.86. JDFS Alberts scores 2.07 and allows 1.57. Games in this league average 3.50 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 71% of Tukums II's games and 79% of JDFS Alberts's. The Over 2.5 rates are 71% and 71%, compared with league averages of 63% for BTTS and 70% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

JDFS Alberts has the higher season xG average, 1.90 to 1.48 per game. Tukums II takes 9.9 shots per game, while JDFS Alberts takes 14.4.

First-half and second-half trends

Tukums II leads at halftime in 14% of its games and scores 0.86 goals per game after halftime. JDFS Alberts leads at halftime in 29% and scores 1.36 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tukums II's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (7 goals). For JDFS Alberts, it is minutes 76-90+ (9 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

1. Liga games average 3.50 goals. Both teams score in 63% of games, and 70% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 3 previous meetings were available. The record was 0 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 5.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

JDFS Alberts appears to be the favorite: they sit 5th versus Tukums II in 12th and have 7 wins this season compared to the home side’s 3, as well as 29 goals scored versus 18 for their opponents. In the last five matches the visitors have scored 8 goals and average 1.4 points per game, while the hosts have scored 4 goals and manage only 0.6 PPG; additionally Tukums II conceded as many as 18 goals in those five matches (3.6 per game) versus 9 (1.8) for JDFS. Chance quality is similar (average xG 1.60 for the home side in home matches vs 1.69 for the visitors away), but the visitors are more efficient — conversion 16% vs 11% for the hosts and on average 2.0 goals away compared to 1.29 for the hosts at home. Defensively the data are mixed: overall Tukums II conceded 40 goals this season versus 22 for JDFS, however lower average xG against for the visitors away (1.05 vs 1.66 against the hosts) and the smaller number of goals conceded in the last 5 matches (9 vs 18) indicate greater defensive stability for JDFS. Considering the table advantage, better scoring efficiency (29–18) and more favorable recent-five-match trends, I predict a JDFS Alberts victory.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because JDFS Alberts has 100% BTTS this season and Tukums II 57% — combined well above the league average of 61%. Seasonal goal figures show Tukums II scores 2.14 and concedes 1.14 per game, while JDFS scores 2.00 and concedes 2.00; together this yields 4.14 goals per game between the teams. xG stats are 2.1 for Tukums and 1.69 for JDFS, with xG against 1.33 and 1.05 respectively — total expected xG around 3.79 and a high number of chances (on average 8.14 shots on target for the home side vs 4.43 for the away side). In the last 5 matches Tukums concedes 3.6 goals and scores 0.8 on average, while JDFS scores 1.6 and concedes 1.8, indicating the hosts are vulnerable at the back and the visitors regularly find the net. Considering JDFS 100% BTTS, Tukums 57% BTTS, high share of games over 2.5 goals (86% for JDFS) and a league average of 3.49 goals per match, I assign BTTS 78% (Yes) vs 22% (No).

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Both teams produce a high number of goals: Tukums II scores an average of 2.14 goals per game with xG 2.10, while JDFS Alberts averages 2.00 goals with xG 1.69; hosts concede 1.14 goals and visitors 2.00. Season metrics show 86% of Tukums II matches and 100% of JDFS matches finished over 1.5 goals, and the 2.5 line was exceeded in 57% of hosts’ games and 86% of visitors’ games (approximately 72% on average). Averaged xG (2.10 hosts vs 1.05 opponent defense; 1.69 visitors vs 1.33 opponent defense) produce expected goals of about 1.58 for the hosts and 1.51 for the visitors, total 3.09. Note, however, that in the last 5 games Tukums II scored only 0.8 goals and conceded 3.6 (4 scored and 18 conceded), which increases volatility and the likelihood of goals in the match. Based on this, I recommend Over 1.5 as the strongest signal (93%) at the 1.5 line; Over 2.5 is also probable (72%), while Over 3.5 is less certain (48%).

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Tukums II holds the overall advantage: an average of 2.0 points per match versus JDFS Alberts’ 1.43, home xG 2.10 against 1.69 and more shots on target (8.14 vs 4.43), indicating greater chance creation. At half-time the stats favor a draw – hosts were level at the break in 43% of matches and kept a clean sheet to half-time in 71% of games, with average goals by half 0.57 (Tukums) versus 0.86 (JDFS), so 0-0 or a draw at the break is common. The second half clearly favors Tukums: on average 1.57 goals scored after the break and winning the second half in 71% of matches (vs 28% for JDFS), which gives a strong probability of a turnaround or of securing the win after the break. Additionally, JDFS has a season-long BTTS of 100%, but given Tukums’ xG edge and superior shots on target the most likely scenario is a draw at half-time and a home win at full-time, hence X/1 is the strongest signal.

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

0 : 1
First half
1 : 0
Second half

Game stats

38Possession (%)62
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
18Shots7
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
5Shots on target2
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
2.02xG1.35
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
5Corners3
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
75Dangerous attacks103
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
10Fouls10
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
0Cards0
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
1.29Goals scored / game2.07
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
2.86Goals allowed / game1.57
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
42%Average possession54%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
4.43Shots on target / game6.29
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

9.93Shots per game14.36
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
4.43Shots on target6.29
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
12.9%Shot conversion14.4%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
42%Possession54%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
1.48xG for1.9
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
2.01xG against1.19
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

Shooting quality

Tukums II: Counter-attackingJDFS Alberts: Attacking
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
Accuracy (shots on target)45%44%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.150.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.290.33

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

JDFS Alberts is 167% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / game - Tukums II · 1.6 pts / game - JDFS Alberts

Tukums II
LLLWL
Season result split
21% W14% D64% L
Season (W-D-L)
3-2-9
0.79 pts / game · goal difference -22
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
2-1-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDLW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 3.6xG: 1.62Opponent xG: 1.99BTTS: 40%Over 2.5: 60%
JDFS Alberts
DWLWD
Season result split
50% W21% D29% L
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-4
1.71 pts / game · goal difference +7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
2-2-1
1.60 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
3-1-3
Last 5 away
3-1-1
WDLWW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.6Goals conceded: 1.6xG: 1.73Opponent xG: 0.96BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

JDFS Alberts is 60% better for: goals scored per game.

1.29 goals / game - Tukums II · 2.07 goals / game - JDFS Alberts

JDFS Alberts is 82% better for: goals allowed per game.

2.86 goals / game - Tukums II · 1.57 goals / game - JDFS Alberts

Tukums II scoring profile: very strong

Tukums II scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 games), while JDFS Alberts keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 games).

JDFS Alberts scoring profile: very strong

JDFS Alberts scores in 86% of games (12 of 14 games), while Tukums II keeps a clean sheet in 14% (2 of 14 games).

18Goals scored (season)29
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
40Goals conceded (season)22
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
4.14Average goals per game3.64
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
4Goals scored (last 5)8
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
18Goals conceded (last 5)8
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

How often they score at least...

86%1 goal86%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
29%2 goals50%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
7%3 goals36%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
7%4 goals21%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

How often they concede at least...

86%1 goal86%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
71%2 goals43%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
50%3 goals14%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
29%4 goals14%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

63%
League average

Goal patterns

29%BTTS at half-time21%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
0%BTTS in both halves7%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
14%Scored in both halves21%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

BTTS and goal count

64%Min. 3 goals and BTTS64%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
7%Min. 3 goals without BTTS7%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
40%BTTS - last 560%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

79%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
57%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
29%Min. 3 goals before half-time29%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

2nd half

100%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
71%Min. 2 goals after half-time71%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
36%Min. 3 goals after half-time36%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

JDFS Alberts is 70% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

0.71 pts / game - Tukums II · 1.21 pts / game - JDFS Alberts

Tukums II - half-time state
14% leading29% draw57% trailing
JDFS Alberts - half-time state
29% leading36% draw36% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

0.71Points per game (1st half)1.21
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
0.43Goals scored (1st half)0.71
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
1.43Goals conceded (1st half)0.79
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
1.86Average goals (1st half)1.5
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
29%Clean sheet before half-time50%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
64%No goal before half-time64%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

After half-time (2nd half)

1Points per game (2nd half)1.86
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)1.36
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
1.43Goals conceded (2nd half)0.79
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
2.29Average goals (2nd half)2.14
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
29%Clean sheet after half-time29%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts
36%No goal after half-time29%
Tukums IIJDFS Alberts

Tukums II - second-half results

29% W14% D57% L
10
Half-time points
6
Half-time goals
-14
Goal difference (1st half)
14
Second-half points
-8
Goal difference (2nd half)
0.71
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 14% of games and wins 21%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

JDFS Alberts - second-half results

50% W36% D14% L
17
Half-time points
10
Half-time goals
-1
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
+8
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.21
PPG before half-time
Lead holding172%

Leads at halftime in 29% of games and wins 50%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime0.0

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums II - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.400.80
Goals scored / game0.00.8
Goals allowed / game1.81.8
Average goals per game1.82.6
1 goal60%100%
2 goals40%100%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%20%
No goal100%40%
Goal difference-9-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 40% draw - 60% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 0% - Half-time goals total: 0
JDFS Alberts - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.002.00
Goals scored / game0.41.2
Goals allowed / game0.80.8
Average goals per game1.22.0
1 goal60%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%40%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal80%40%
Goal difference-2+2
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 60% won - 20% draw - 20% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 20% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tukums II
ScoredConceded
1
4
0-15
2
7
16-30
3
9
31-45
3
6
46-60
2
7
61-75
7
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (7 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (9). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.

JDFS Alberts
ScoredConceded
2
3
0-15
5
3
16-30
3
5
31-45
2
6
46-60
8
5
61-75
9
0
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (9 goals). Concedes most in 46-60 (6). Late-goal balance (76-90): +9 - wins late phases.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.90
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.4 : 2.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
111%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
+46%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
74%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
2%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 50 matches
4+
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tukums II

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-1.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+3.9 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.19
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.85
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
68%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
178%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.19
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.4
Late goals
39% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 6% come in the first quarter-hour.
39%

JDFS Alberts

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
+0.71
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.21
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-2.7 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.17
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.38
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
129%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
83%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.11
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.7
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 7% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (1. Liga).

Teams vs league

Tukums IILigaJDFS Alberts
Average goals per game 4.143.50 3.64
Both teams scored 71%63% 79%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 71%70% 71%
Clean sheets 14%21% 14%
Goal before half-time 79%74% 64%
Goal after half-time 100%85% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

3.50
Average goals per game
63%
Both teams scored
70%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
21%
Clean sheets
1.89
Home goals / game
1.61
Away goals / game
+17%
Home attack advantage
+15%
Home defensive advantage
+7%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
74%
1 goal
37%
2 goals
17%
3 goals
5%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
63%
2 goals
36%
3 goals
13%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Home team

Away team

Other recorded players

Matīss Zēģele⚽ 1

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. JDFS AlbertsGoalMatīss Zēģele

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tukums II's perspective: 0 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against JDFS Alberts. Games average 5.67 goals, and both teams scored in 100% of them.

JDFS Alberts
6 : 1
Tukums II
JDFS Alberts
4 : 3
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
FK Tukums 2000 / TSS II
1 : 2
JDFS Alberts

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts?

The 1. Liga match finished Tukums II 1:1 JDFS Alberts. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums II and JDFS Alberts?

In the last 3 head-to-head matches Tukums II won 0, JDFS Alberts won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 5.67 goals, with both teams scoring in 100% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts?

Tukums II score 1.29 goals per game on average and JDFS Alberts 2.07. The 1. Liga average is 3.50 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 70% of games. Both teams score in 71% of Tukums II's matches and 79% of JDFS Alberts's.

What form are Tukums II and JDFS Alberts in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums II have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and JDFS Alberts 2-2-1 (1.60 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts?

The statistical background for Tukums II vs JDFS Alberts — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.