Latvia - VirsligaTukuma pilsētas stadionsData current as of 17 July 2026

Tukums vs Super Nova: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Tukums vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Key match information

Tukums play Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The match date is 1 July 2026 at 17:00. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 1:2.

Current form

Tukums: 1-0-4, 0.60 points/match. Super Nova: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.

Goal statistics

Tukums scores 1.68 and concedes 2.00 goals per match. Super Nova scores 1.05 and concedes 1.59. League average: 2.99 goals.

BTTS / Over / Under

BTTS: Tukums 91%, Super Nova 64%. Over 2.5: Tukums 77%, Super Nova 59%. League level: BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

xG, shots and style

Tukums has higher xG: 1.45 vs 1.15. Tukums: 12.1 shots per match, Super Nova: 8.6.

Match halves

Tukums: half-time lead 23%, second-half goals 0.86. Super Nova: half-time lead 18%, second-half goals 0.45.

Goals by minute

Tukums: 76-90+ (12 goals). Super Nova: 76-90+ (6 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.

League context

Virsliga: 2.99 goals per match, BTTS 57%, Over 2.5 55%.

Head-to-head

6 H2H matches: 1-3-2. Average goals 2.50, BTTS 83%.

Match description

I predict a home win for Tukums, primarily due to a clear offensive edge in home matches: Tukums averages 11.4 shots per home game, 5.2 on target, with an 18% conversion rate and 2.1 goals per home match, while Super Nova away averages only 8.82 shots, 3.45 on target and 0.91 goals per match with a 10% conversion. In the last 5 matches Tukums scored 6 and conceded 12, averaging 0.8 points per match, whereas Super Nova scored 3 and conceded 11, averaging just 0.2 points per match in that period. Regarding quality of chances, average xG for the home side in home fixtures is 1.39 versus 1.2 xG for the away side, and Tukums has 0% matches without scoring at home, while Super Nova failed to score in 36% of their away matches — this further favors the hosts. Both defenses are, however, prone to errors: Tukums concedes 1.4 goals per home match on average, and Super Nova 1.09 away, so I expect an open game with a home advantage. Considering the shot dominance, superior efficiency (18% vs 10%) and no scoreless home matches for the hosts, I assess the probabilities as 55% for Tukums, 25% for a draw and 20% for Super Nova.

Half-by-half

1 : 1
1st half
0 : 1
2nd half

Match statistics

50Possession (%)50
TukumsSuper Nova
11Shots10
TukumsSuper Nova
5Shots on target4
TukumsSuper Nova
1.38xG1.27
TukumsSuper Nova
7Corners6
TukumsSuper Nova
47Dangerous attacks50
TukumsSuper Nova
11Fouls12
TukumsSuper Nova
1Cards1
TukumsSuper Nova

Pre-match profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.

1.68Goals scored / match1.05
TukumsSuper Nova
2Goals conceded / match1.59
TukumsSuper Nova
44%Average possession45%
TukumsSuper Nova
4.86Shots on target / match3.45
TukumsSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.

12.09Shots per match8.64
TukumsSuper Nova
4.86Shots on target3.45
TukumsSuper Nova
13.9%Shot conversion12.1%
TukumsSuper Nova
44%Possession45%
TukumsSuper Nova
1.45xG for1.15
TukumsSuper Nova
1.65xG against1.68
TukumsSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
TukumsSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)40%40%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.13
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.350.30

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.

Super Nova is 33% better for: last-5 form.

0.6 pts / match - Tukums · 0.8 pts / match - Super Nova

Tukums
WLLLL
Season result split
14% W36% R50% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-11
0.77 pts / match · goal difference -7
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-0-4
0.60 pts / match
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-4
Last 5 at home
2-1-2
WLDWL
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 1.4Goals conceded: 2.6xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.74BTTS: 100%Over 2.5: 100%
Super Nova
DLLWL
Season result split
32% W14% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
7-3-12
1.09 pts / match · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / match
Record away (W-D-L)
6-1-5
Last 5 away
2-1-2
WLLDW
Last 5 matches - averages
Goals scored: 0.8Goals conceded: 2.0xG: 1.24Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 60% better for: goals scored per match.

1.68 goals / match - Tukums · 1.05 goals / match - Super Nova

Super Nova is 26% better for: goals conceded per match.

2 goals / match - Tukums · 1.59 goals / match - Super Nova

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 95% of matches (21 of 22 matches), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 18% (4 of 22 matches).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 77% of matches (17 of 22 matches), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 22 matches).

37Goals scored (season)23
TukumsSuper Nova
44Goals conceded (season)35
TukumsSuper Nova
3.68Average goals in match2.64
TukumsSuper Nova
7Goals scored (last 5)4
TukumsSuper Nova
13Goals conceded (last 5)10
TukumsSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

95%1 goal77%
TukumsSuper Nova
32%2 goals23%
TukumsSuper Nova
18%3 goals5%
TukumsSuper Nova
9%4 goals0%
TukumsSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal82%
TukumsSuper Nova
64%2 goals50%
TukumsSuper Nova
36%3 goals14%
TukumsSuper Nova
5%4 goals9%
TukumsSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.

57%
League average

Goal patterns

41%BTTS at half-time32%
TukumsSuper Nova
9%BTTS in both halves0%
TukumsSuper Nova
27%Scored in both halves9%
TukumsSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

68%Min. 3 goals and BTTS55%
TukumsSuper Nova
9%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
TukumsSuper Nova
100%BTTS - last 560%
TukumsSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these matches cross the goal lines?

How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.

1st half

91%Min. 1 goal before half-time64%
TukumsSuper Nova
68%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
TukumsSuper Nova
27%Min. 3 goals before half-time23%
TukumsSuper Nova

2nd half

91%Min. 1 goal after half-time86%
TukumsSuper Nova
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time27%
TukumsSuper Nova
18%Min. 3 goals after half-time5%
TukumsSuper Nova

Match halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Super Nova is 5% better for: first-half form (half-time points).

1 pts / match - Tukums · 1.05 pts / match - Super Nova

Tukums - half-time state
23% leading32% draw45% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
18% leading50% draw32% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1Points per match (1st half)1.05
TukumsSuper Nova
0.82Goals scored (1st half)0.59
TukumsSuper Nova
1.09Goals conceded (1st half)0.86
TukumsSuper Nova
1.91Average goals (1st half)1.45
TukumsSuper Nova
27%Clean sheet before half-time50%
TukumsSuper Nova
41%No goal before half-time55%
TukumsSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

1.18Points per match (2nd half)1.14
TukumsSuper Nova
0.86Goals scored (2nd half)0.45
TukumsSuper Nova
0.91Goals conceded (2nd half)0.73
TukumsSuper Nova
1.77Average goals (2nd half)1.18
TukumsSuper Nova
27%Clean sheet after half-time45%
TukumsSuper Nova
36%No goal after half-time59%
TukumsSuper Nova

Tukums - second-half results

27% W36% R36% P
22
Half-time points
18
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
26
Second-half points
-1
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.00
PPG before half-time
Lead holding61%

Leads at half-time in 23% of matches and wins 14%. Sometimes loses the lead after half-time.

Defence after half-time-0.2

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Super Nova - second-half results

32% W18% R50% P
23
Half-time points
13
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding178%

Leads at half-time in 18% of matches and wins 32%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.

Defence after half-time-0.1

Defence stays stable across the full match.

Tukums - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match1.000.80
Goals scored / match0.80.6
Goals conceded / match1.21.4
Average goals in match2.02.0
1 goal100%100%
2 goals80%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet0%20%
No goal40%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 4
Super Nova - last 5 matches by half
1st half2nd half
Points per match0.800.80
Goals scored / match0.40.4
Goals conceded / match0.81.2
Average goals in match1.21.6
1 goal40%80%
2 goals40%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet60%40%
No goal60%60%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 0% leading - 80% draw - 20% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 2

* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
11
16-30
10
8
31-45
4
8
46-60
3
7
61-75
12
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 16-30 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): +7 - wins late phases.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
5
12
31-45
3
6
46-60
1
3
61-75
6
7
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goli). Concedes most in 31-45 (12). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.

Match profile

3.16
Estimated goals
attack vs opponent defence
1.6 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
78%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
73%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs defence on both sides

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.20
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.12
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-10.3 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.23
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
-0.35
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
100%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
153%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.17
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.0
Late goals
32% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
32%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.53
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.01
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.10
Defensive efficiency
Does the defence or goalkeeper save the team? Positive means it concedes less than the chances allowed suggest.
+0.09
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
80%
Defence vs league
How much the team concedes compared with the league average. 80% means 20% fewer goals conceded.
95%
Form trend
Compares points from the last 5 matches with the whole-season average.
-0.29
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.1
Late goals
26% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 13% come in the first quarter-hour.
26%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaSuper Nova
Average goals in match 3.682.99 2.64
Both teams scored 91%57% 64%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 77%55% 59%
Clean sheets 5%23% 18%
Goal before half-time 91%75% 64%
Goal after half-time 91%85% 86%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.99
Average goals per match
57%
Both teams scored
55%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
23%
Clean sheets
1.68
Home goals / match
1.31
Away goals / match
+28%
Home attack advantage
+22%
Home defence advantage
+5%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
75%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
19%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
85%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
16%
3 goals
6%
4 goals

Head-to-head

Recent meetings (6): Tukums 1 - 3 - 2 Super Nova. Average goals 2.50, both teams scored in 83% matches.

SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
1 : 2
SK Super Nova
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 2
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:2 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Super Nova?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tukums won 1, Super Nova won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Super Nova?

Tukums score 1.68 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.05. The Virsliga average is 2.99 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 55% of games. Both teams score in 91% of Tukums's matches and 64% of Super Nova's.

What form are Tukums and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 1-0-4 record (0.60 points per game) and Super Nova 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Super Nova?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.