Latvia - VirsligaTukuma pilsētas stadionsData current as of September 01, 2026

Tukums vs Super Nova: match statistics

Tukums crest
Tukums
1 : 2half-time 1:1
Super Nova crest
Super Nova

Tukums vs Super Nova: form, goals and key statistics

Game details

Tukums played against Super Nova in Virsliga (Latvia). The game was played on July 1, 2026. Venue: Tukuma pilsētas stadions. Final score: 1:2.

Recent form

Tukums has 1 win, 1 draw and 3 losses over its last five games, averaging 0.80 points per game. Super Nova has 0 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, with 0.20 points per game.

Scoring records

Tukums scores 1.75 goals per game and allows 1.95. Super Nova scores 1.00 and allows 1.60. Games in this league average 2.98 goals.

BTTS and goal totals

Both teams score in 90% of Tukums's games and 60% of Super Nova's. The Over 2.5 rates are 75% and 55%, compared with league averages of 56% for BTTS and 54% for Over 2.5.

xG and shots

Tukums has the higher season xG average, 1.43 to 1.12 per game. Tukums takes 12.1 shots per game, while Super Nova takes 8.3.

First-half and second-half trends

Tukums leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.90 goals per game after halftime. Super Nova leads at halftime in 20% and scores 0.40 after halftime.

When the teams score

Tukums's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (11 goals). For Super Nova, it is minutes 16-30 (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.

League scoring profile

Virsliga games average 2.98 goals. Both teams score in 56% of games, and 54% finish with at least three goals.

Head-to-head record

Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 1 home win, 3 draws and 2 away wins. Those games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

Archived pre-match analysis

This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.

General match analysis

I predict a home win for Tukums, primarily due to a clear offensive edge in home matches: Tukums averages 11.4 shots per home game, 5.2 on target, with an 18% conversion rate and 2.1 goals per home match, while Super Nova away averages only 8.82 shots, 3.45 on target and 0.91 goals per match with a 10% conversion. In the last 5 matches Tukums scored 6 and conceded 12, averaging 0.8 points per match, whereas Super Nova scored 3 and conceded 11, averaging just 0.2 points per match in that period. Regarding quality of chances, average xG for the home side in home fixtures is 1.39 versus 1.2 xG for the away side, and Tukums has 0% matches without scoring at home, while Super Nova failed to score in 36% of their away matches — this further favors the hosts. Both defenses are, however, prone to errors: Tukums concedes 1.4 goals per home match on average, and Super Nova 1.09 away, so I expect an open game with a home advantage. Considering the shot dominance, superior efficiency (18% vs 10%) and no scoreless home matches for the hosts, I assess the probabilities as 55% for Tukums, 25% for a draw and 20% for Super Nova.

View the statistical overview
BTTS - will both teams score?

I back BTTS - Yes because Tukums has a season BTTS rate of 89% versus Super Nova’s 36%, and in the last 5 matches BTTS occurred in 80% and 60% of games respectively. Tukums concedes an average of 2.22 goals per game over the season and 2.4 in the last 5 matches, and has recorded no clean sheets all season (0% clean sheets), which clearly increases the likelihood of the visitors scoring. Super Nova has a seasonal scoring average of 0.91 goals and xG 1.2 per game and has scored 3 goals in the last 5, but also conceded an average of 2.2 goals in those five matches, so they both score and concede. Additionally, Tukums has a higher shot conversion rate (15% vs 10%) and a similar number of shots on target (3.44 vs 3.45), while opponents generate on average 1.93 xG against Tukums, suggesting an open game with goals at both ends. Considering these figures and the league goals average of 2.96, I assign BTTS 80% and No 20%.

View BTTS statistics
Over/Under - goals analysis

Tukums at home records 100% of matches with at least 2 goals, averaging 1.11 scored and 2.22 conceded per game; Super Nova has 64% of matches with ≥2 goals, averaging 0.91 scored and 1.09 conceded. xG for both teams are 1.02 (Tukums) and 1.20 (Super Nova), with xG against 1.93 for Tukums and 1.49 for Super Nova; a simple aggregation yields expected 1.26 goals for the home side and 1.57 for the away side, total 2.83 goals. In the last 5 matches Tukums scored 6 and conceded 12 (1.2 and 2.4 on average), Super Nova scored 3 and conceded 11 (0.6 and 2.2), and the share of matches >2.5 was 80% and 60%, which increases the likelihood of at least three goals. Based on this I estimate Over 1.5 at around 82% (Under 18%), Over 2.5 at 63% (Under 37%), and Over 3.5 as unlikely (~18% Over vs 82% Under). Therefore the strongest and most certain signal is Over 1.5 (recommended bet) — Tukums’ 100% home record for matches with ≥2 goals and the expected 2.83 total goals support taking that line.

View Over/Under statistics
HT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario

Super Nova appears to be the favorite: the visitors win 45% of matches versus 11% for the hosts, they have xG_for 1.20 versus 1.02 and concede on average 1.09 goals per match compared to 2.22 conceded by Tukums. At half-time the stats point to a draw or a lead for the away side — Tukums lead at the break in only 22% of fixtures and are losing at half-time in 44%, while Super Nova are level at half-time in 55% and leading in 18%, which averaged gives roughly a 31% chance that the visitors will be leading after 45 minutes. The second half favors the visitors: second-half points for Super Nova are 1.18 versus 1.00 for the hosts, and the percentage of clean second halves is 55% vs 33%, so the visitors more often hold the result. Additionally, Tukums have a high home rate of both teams scoring (BTTS 89%) and on average concede 1.33 goals before the break, which facilitates the away side taking the lead. Overall the strongest signal is 2/2 (visitors lead at the break and win) — in my model this scenario has about a 24% probability, ahead of X/2 (~21%) and X/1 (~15%).

View first-half and second-half statistics

Stats by half

1 : 1
First half
0 : 1
Second half

Game stats

50Possession (%)50
TukumsSuper Nova
11Shots10
TukumsSuper Nova
5Shots on target4
TukumsSuper Nova
1.38xG1.27
TukumsSuper Nova
7Corners6
TukumsSuper Nova
47Dangerous attacks50
TukumsSuper Nova
11Fouls12
TukumsSuper Nova
1Cards1
TukumsSuper Nova

Pre-game profilewhat do the season numbers say?

This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.

1.75Goals scored / game1
TukumsSuper Nova
1.95Goals allowed / game1.6
TukumsSuper Nova
44%Average possession44%
TukumsSuper Nova
4.8Shots on target / game3.45
TukumsSuper Nova

Team statswho is more efficient?

Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.

12.1Shots per game8.25
TukumsSuper Nova
4.8Shots on target3.45
TukumsSuper Nova
14.5%Shot conversion12.1%
TukumsSuper Nova
44%Possession44%
TukumsSuper Nova
1.43xG for1.12
TukumsSuper Nova
1.67xG against1.68
TukumsSuper Nova

Shooting quality

Tukums: Counter-attackingSuper Nova: Counter-attacking
TukumsSuper Nova
Accuracy (shots on target)40%42%
Chance quality (xG per shot)0.120.14
Finishing (goals per shot on target)0.360.29

xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.

* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.

Team formwho is in better shape?

Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.

Tukums is 300% better for: last-5 form.

0.8 pts / game - Tukums · 0.2 pts / game - Super Nova

Tukums
LDWLL
Season result split
15% W40% R45% P
Season (W-D-L)
3-8-9
0.85 pts / game · goal difference -4
Last 5 (W-D-L)
1-1-3
0.80 pts / game
Record at home (W-D-L)
3-4-3
Last 5 at home
3-1-1
WWLDW
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 1.2Goals conceded: 2.4xG: 1.65Opponent xG: 1.95BTTS: 80%Over 2.5: 80%
Super Nova
LLDLL
No win in the last 5 games
Season result split
30% W15% R55% P
Season (W-D-L)
6-3-11
1.05 pts / game · goal difference -12
Last 5 (W-D-L)
0-1-4
0.20 pts / game
Record away (W-D-L)
5-1-5
Last 5 away
1-1-3
LWLLD
Last 5 games - averages
Goals scored: 0.6Goals conceded: 2.2xG: 1.13Opponent xG: 1.81BTTS: 60%Over 2.5: 60%

Goalshow do both teams score and concede?

How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.

Tukums is 75% better for: goals scored per game.

1.75 goals / game - Tukums · 1 goals / game - Super Nova

Super Nova is 22% better for: goals allowed per game.

1.95 goals / game - Tukums · 1.6 goals / game - Super Nova

Tukums scoring profile: very strong

Tukums scores in 95% of games (19 of 20 meczów), while Super Nova keeps a clean sheet in 20% (4 of 20 meczów).

Super Nova scoring profile: very strong

Super Nova scores in 75% of games (15 of 20 meczów), while Tukums keeps a clean sheet in 5% (1 of 20 meczów).

35Goals scored (season)20
TukumsSuper Nova
39Goals conceded (season)32
TukumsSuper Nova
3.7Average goals per game2.6
TukumsSuper Nova
6Goals scored (last 5)3
TukumsSuper Nova
12Goals conceded (last 5)11
TukumsSuper Nova

How often they score at least...

95%1 goal75%
TukumsSuper Nova
35%2 goals20%
TukumsSuper Nova
20%3 goals5%
TukumsSuper Nova
10%4 goals0%
TukumsSuper Nova

How often they concede at least...

95%1 goal80%
TukumsSuper Nova
60%2 goals50%
TukumsSuper Nova
35%3 goals15%
TukumsSuper Nova
5%4 goals10%
TukumsSuper Nova

* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.

Both teams scored (BTTS)how often do both teams score?

How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.

56%
League average

Goal patterns

40%BTTS at half-time30%
TukumsSuper Nova
10%BTTS in both halves0%
TukumsSuper Nova
30%Scored in both halves5%
TukumsSuper Nova

BTTS and goal count

65%Min. 3 goals and BTTS50%
TukumsSuper Nova
10%Min. 3 goals without BTTS5%
TukumsSuper Nova
80%BTTS - last 560%
TukumsSuper Nova

Goal count (Over/Under)how often do these games cross the goal lines?

See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.

1st half

90%Min. 1 goal before half-time65%
TukumsSuper Nova
65%Min. 2 goals before half-time50%
TukumsSuper Nova
30%Min. 3 goals before half-time25%
TukumsSuper Nova

2nd half

90%Min. 1 goal after half-time85%
TukumsSuper Nova
55%Min. 2 goals after half-time25%
TukumsSuper Nova
20%Min. 3 goals after half-time0%
TukumsSuper Nova

Game halveswhen do the teams score more often?

How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.

Tukums - half-time state
25% leading30% draw45% trailing
Super Nova - half-time state
20% leading45% draw35% trailing

Before half-time (1st half)

1.05Points per game (1st half)1.05
TukumsSuper Nova
0.85Goals scored (1st half)0.6
TukumsSuper Nova
1.05Goals conceded (1st half)0.9
TukumsSuper Nova
1.9Average goals (1st half)1.5
TukumsSuper Nova
30%Clean sheet before half-time50%
TukumsSuper Nova
40%No goal before half-time55%
TukumsSuper Nova

After half-time (2nd half)

1.25Points per game (2nd half)1.1
TukumsSuper Nova
0.9Goals scored (2nd half)0.4
TukumsSuper Nova
0.9Goals conceded (2nd half)0.7
TukumsSuper Nova
1.8Average goals (2nd half)1.1
TukumsSuper Nova
30%Clean sheet after half-time45%
TukumsSuper Nova
35%No goal after half-time65%
TukumsSuper Nova

Tukums - second-half results

30% W35% R35% P
21
Half-time points
17
Half-time goals
-4
Goal difference (1st half)
25
Second-half points
0
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding60%

Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 15%. Sometimes gives up a halftime lead.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Super Nova - second-half results

30% W20% R50% P
21
Half-time points
12
Half-time goals
-6
Goal difference (1st half)
22
Second-half points
-6
Goal difference (2nd half)
1.05
PPG before half-time
Lead holding150%

Leads at halftime in 20% of games and wins 30%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.

Defense after halftime-0.2

Defense stays consistent across the full game.

Tukums - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game1.000.80
Goals scored / game0.60.6
Goals allowed / game1.01.4
Average goals per game1.62.0
1 goal80%100%
2 goals60%60%
3 goals20%20%
Clean sheet20%20%
No goal60%40%
Goal difference-2-4
Half-time: 20% leading - 40% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 20% won - 20% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 40% - Half-time goals total: 3
Super Nova - last 5 games by half
1st half2nd half
Points per game0.600.40
Goals scored / game0.60.0
Goals allowed / game1.21.0
Average goals per game1.81.0
1 goal60%60%
2 goals60%40%
3 goals40%0%
Clean sheet40%40%
No goal40%100%
Goal difference-3-5
Half-time: 0% leading - 60% draw - 40% trailing
2nd half: 0% won - 40% draw - 60% lost
BTTS at half-time (last 5): 60% - Half-time goals total: 3

* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.

Goals by minutewhen do goals arrive?

The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.

Tukums
ScoredConceded
4
5
0-15
4
10
16-30
9
6
31-45
4
6
46-60
3
7
61-75
11
5
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (10). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.

Super Nova
ScoredConceded
3
2
0-15
5
5
16-30
4
11
31-45
2
5
46-60
1
3
61-75
5
6
76-90

Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (5 goals). Concedes most in 31-45 (11). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.

* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.

Additional team indicatorswhat do xG, efficiency and form show?

A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.

Game profile

3.15
Estimated goals
attack vs. opponent defense
1.7 : 1.5
Estimated goal split
home : away
106%
Pace vs league
100% = league average
75%
Both teams scored (BTTS)
average from both teams' seasons
-21%
Derby effect
H2H goals vs typical matches
71%
BTTS estimate
from both teams' scoring frequency
1%
0:0 risk
about 1 in 100 matches
2-3
Most common goal range
attack vs. defense for both teams

Tukums

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.24
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
+0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
-9.8 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
+0.32
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
-0.28
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
105%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
148%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.05
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
+0.1
Late goals
31% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 11% come in the first quarter-hour.
31%

Super Nova

Net xG balance
Difference between the quality of chances created and allowed per match.
-0.56
Results compared with xG
Difference between the actual goal balance and the balance suggested by xG.
-0.04
Points compared with goal balance
Comparison between collected points and the points implied by the team's goal balance.
+4.1 pts
Finishing efficiency
Does the team convert chances? Positive means it scores more than the quality of chances suggests.
-0.12
Defensive efficiency
Does the defense or goalkeeper outperform the chances allowed? A positive value means the team allows fewer goals than its xGA suggests.
+0.08
Attack vs league
How much the team scores compared with the league average for this role. 120% means 20% above average.
76%
Defense vs. league
Goals allowed compared with the league average. An 80% score means 20% fewer goals allowed.
96%
Form trend
Compares points from the last five games with the full-season average.
-0.85
Stronger second half?
How many more goals the team scores after half-time than before it.
-0.2
Late goals
25% of this team's goals come in minutes 76-90. For comparison, 15% come in the first quarter-hour.
25%

* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.

League contextis this a high-scoring league?

How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Virsliga).

Teams vs league

TukumsLigaSuper Nova
Average goals per game 3.702.98 2.60
Both teams scored 90%56% 60%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) 75%54% 55%
Clean sheets 5%24% 20%
Goal before half-time 90%76% 65%
Goal after half-time 90%84% 85%

^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.

2.98
Average goals per game
56%
Both teams scored
54%
Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5)
24%
Clean sheets
1.66
Home goals / game
1.32
Away goals / game
+26%
Home attack advantage
+20%
Home defensive advantage
+3%
Total home advantage
Goals in 1st half (whole league)
76%
1 goal
45%
2 goals
20%
3 goals
4%
4 goals
Goals in 2nd half (whole league)
84%
1 goal
43%
2 goals
15%
3 goals
7%
4 goals

Lineups and player events

Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.

Match timeline

Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.

  1. TukumsYellow cardMartins Štāls
  2. Super NovaGoalValerijs Lizunovs
  3. Super NovaGoalKristers SkadmanisAssist: Alens Grikovs
  4. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Kristaps KļaviņšOff: Jun Toba
  5. Super NovaSubstitutionOn: Ge Ismael SyllaOff: Alens Grikovs
  6. Super NovaYellow cardRalfs Šitjakovs
  7. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Tomo MatsubaraOff: Leoni Schmidt Pereira Gastaldelo
  8. TukumsSubstitutionOn: Renē BaumanisOff: Mārcis Šusts

Referee and managers

Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.

Head-to-head

Record from Tukums's perspective: 1 win, 3 draws and 2 losses against Super Nova. Games average 2.50 goals, and both teams scored in 83% of them.

Super Nova
1 : 1
Tukums
Tukums
1 : 2
Super Nova
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 1
SK Super Nova
SK Super Nova
1 : 0
FK Tukums 2000
SK Super Nova
1 : 1
FK Tukums 2000
FK Tukums 2000
2 : 2
SK Super Nova

FAQ

What was the result of Tukums vs Super Nova?

The Virsliga match finished Tukums 1:2 Super Nova. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.

What is the head-to-head record between Tukums and Super Nova?

In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tukums won 1, Super Nova won 2 and 3 ended level. These games averaged 2.50 goals, with both teams scoring in 83% of them.

What do the goal statistics show before Tukums vs Super Nova?

Tukums score 1.75 goals per game on average and Super Nova 1.00. The Virsliga average is 2.98 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 54% of games. Both teams score in 90% of Tukums's matches and 60% of Super Nova's.

What form are Tukums and Super Nova in?

Over the last 5 games Tukums have a 1-1-3 record (0.80 points per game) and Super Nova 0-1-4 (0.20 points per game).

Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tukums vs Super Nova?

This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.