Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs: match statistics
Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Tulsa Roughnecks played against Colorado Springs in USL Championship (United States). The game was played on June 21, 2026. Venue: ONEOK Field. Final score: 1:2.
Recent form
Tulsa Roughnecks has 3 wins, 1 draw and 1 loss over its last five games, averaging 2.00 points per game. Colorado Springs has 1 win, 2 draws and 2 losses, with 1.00 points per game.
Scoring records
Tulsa Roughnecks scores 1.33 goals per game and allows 1.17. Colorado Springs scores 1.64 and allows 1.64. Games in this league average 2.71 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's games and 64% of Colorado Springs's. The Over 2.5 rates are 33% and 55%, compared with league averages of 55% for BTTS and 50% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Colorado Springs has the higher season xG average, 1.60 to 1.31 per game. Tulsa Roughnecks takes 11.1 shots per game, while Colorado Springs takes 14.3.
First-half and second-half trends
Tulsa Roughnecks leads at halftime in 25% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Colorado Springs leads at halftime in 18% and scores 1.09 after halftime.
When the teams score
Tulsa Roughnecks's most productive scoring window is minutes 46-60 (5 goals). For Colorado Springs, it is minutes 76-90+ (5 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
USL Championship games average 2.71 goals. Both teams score in 55% of games, and 50% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 6 previous meetings were available. The record was 3 home wins, 0 draws and 3 away wins. Those games averaged 2.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
Tulsa are favorites at home: they concede only 0.67 goals per game at home on average, have 50% clean sheets and 50% wins, while Colorado concede 1.83 goals on the road and have only 17% wins and 17% clean sheets. Both teams score 1.33 goals per game on average, but Tulsa register more shots on target (3.17 per game) and have a higher home conversion rate (13%) versus the visitors' 2.33 shots on target and 11% conversion. Colorado have better form over the last 5 matches (3 wins and 1.8 pts per game) compared to Tulsa (2 wins and 1.4 pts per game); additionally, in the last 5 fixtures Tulsa conceded 7 goals and scored 6, while Colorado scored 7 and conceded 4. xG presents a balanced picture (Tulsa xG at home 1.26 vs Colorado xG away 1.35), however the hosts’ defensive advantage (0.67 vs 1.83) and superior conversion give Tulsa greater chances to win, hence the 60%/20%/20% rating.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
The statistics strongly favor a BTTS - Yes scenario: Tulsa has a season BTTS of 80% and 0% clean sheets at home, meaning the hosts almost always concede at home. Tulsa scores 2.0 goals per game (xG 1.86) and averages 16.0 shots with 4.6 on target, while Colorado Springs as the away side concedes 1.83 goals per game on average (xG against 1.37), which supports Tulsa finding the net. Colorado has a season BTTS of 50% and in the last 5 matches averaged 1.4 goals for and 0.8 conceded, so the visitors can respond, but the last 5 games reduce the overall BTTS signal relative to the stronger home trend. Additionally the league records 55% BTTS matches, and the combination of Tulsa’s 80%, zero home clean sheets and the relatively high away goals conceded (1.83) yields a strong signal for Yes; therefore I assess the probability of both teams scoring at 75% versus 25% against.
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
Tulsa averages 2.0 goals at home with xG 1.86, Colorado averages 1.33 goals away with xG 1.35, yielding expected goals of 1.62 for the home side and 1.08 for the visitors, totaling 2.70 goals. A Poisson model with lambda=2.70 gives roughly a 75% chance of at least 2 goals (Over 1.5), ~51% for at least 3 goals (Over 2.5) and ~29% for 4+ goals (Over 3.5). Seasonal stats support this: Tulsa has 80% of home matches Over 1.5, Colorado 67%, and both teams have 100% of matches with over 0.5 goals (no 0-0s). Additionally, Tulsa averages 16 shots and 4.6 on target per match versus Colorado’s 12.33/2.33 with conversion rates of 13% vs 11%, which increases the probability of at least two goals. Based on this, the strongest and most reliable signal is Over 1.5 (selection: over at the 1.5 line).
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
The most likely scenario is a Half-Time draw with a home win (X/1), because draws at the break occur frequently: Tulsa is level at half-time in 60% of matches and Colorado Springs in 67%, yielding approximately a 63% probability of an HT draw. At the same time Tulsa dominates second halves — the home side wins the second half in 60% of cases and averages 1.4 goals in the second half versus 0.83 for the visitors, so they have a higher chance of turning the draw around after the break. Tulsa’s offensive advantage is supported by xG of 1.86 versus 1.35 for Colorado Springs, along with shots on target 4.6 vs 2.33 and a seasonal goals-per-game average of 2.0 vs 1.33 with conversion rates of 13% vs 11%. Additionally, the hosts win 40% of their season matches compared to 17% for the visitors, and Tulsa’s matches record over 0.5 second-half goals in 100% of cases (vs 83% for the visitors), which reinforces the likelihood of converting an HT draw into a home victory.
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 33% | 24% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.12 | 0.11 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.36 | 0.49 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 100% better for: last-5 form.
2 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1 pts / game - Colorado Springs
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Colorado Springs is 23% better for: goals scored per game.
1.33 goals / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.64 goals / game - Colorado Springs
Tulsa Roughnecks is 40% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.17 goals / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.64 goals / game - Colorado Springs
Tulsa Roughnecks scores in 67% of games (8 of 12 meczów), while Colorado Springs keeps a clean sheet in 9% (1 of 11 meczów).
Colorado Springs scores in 73% of games (8 of 11 meczów), while Tulsa Roughnecks keeps a clean sheet in 33% (4 of 12 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Tulsa Roughnecks
Over / Under - Colorado Springs
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Tulsa Roughnecks is 6% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.25 pts / game - Tulsa Roughnecks · 1.18 pts / game - Colorado Springs
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tulsa Roughnecks - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 25% of games and wins 42%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.2 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
Colorado Springs - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 18% of games and wins 27%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.7 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 2.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.8 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.4 |
| Average goals per game | 1.4 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 80% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -1 | +2 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.20 | 0.60 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.6 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 20% |
| No goal | 40% | 60% |
| Goal difference | 0 | -2 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 46-60 (5 goals). Concedes most in 16-30 (3). Late-goal balance (76-90): -1 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (5 goals). Concedes most in 61-75 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): 0.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Tulsa Roughnecks
Colorado Springs
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (USL Championship).
Teams vs league
| Tulsa Roughnecks | Liga | Colorado Springs | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▼ 2.50 | 2.71 | ▲ 3.27 |
| Both teams scored | ▼ 50% | 55% | ▲ 64% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▼ 33% | 50% | ▲ 55% |
| Clean sheets | ▲ 33% | 28% | ▼ 9% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 58% | 67% | ▼ 64% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 83% | 78% | ▲ 91% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Tulsa Roughnecks's perspective: 3 wins, 0 draws and 3 losses against Colorado Springs. Games average 2.17 goals, and both teams scored in 17% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs?
The USL Championship match finished Tulsa Roughnecks 1:2 Colorado Springs. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Tulsa Roughnecks and Colorado Springs?
In the last 6 head-to-head matches Tulsa Roughnecks won 3, Colorado Springs won 3 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 2.17 goals, with both teams scoring in 17% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs?
Tulsa Roughnecks score 1.33 goals per game on average and Colorado Springs 1.64. The USL Championship average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 50% of games. Both teams score in 50% of Tulsa Roughnecks's matches and 64% of Colorado Springs's.
What form are Tulsa Roughnecks and Colorado Springs in?
Over the last 5 games Tulsa Roughnecks have a 3-1-1 record (2.00 points per game) and Colorado Springs 1-2-2 (1.00 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs?
The statistical background for Tulsa Roughnecks vs Colorado Springs — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under — is on this page. The tip with full reasoning and a value assessment is in the NoFluffPicks app.