Tunari vs Afumaţi: match statistics
Tunari vs Afumaţi: form, goals and key statistics
Key match information
Tunari play Afumaţi in Liga II (Romania). The match date is 4 April 2026 at 10:00. Final score: 0:4.
Current form
Tunari: 3-2-0, 2.20 points/match. Afumaţi: 1-1-3, 0.80 points/match.
Goal statistics
Tunari scores 1.00 and concedes 1.64 goals per match. Afumaţi scores 1.36 and concedes 1.25. League average: 2.71 goals.
BTTS / Over / Under
BTTS: Tunari 64%, Afumaţi 50%. Over 2.5: Tunari 50%, Afumaţi 50%. League level: BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
xG, shots and style
Afumaţi has higher xG: 1.66 vs 1.22. Tunari: 9.3 shots per match, Afumaţi: 11.6.
Match halves
Tunari: half-time lead 14%, second-half goals 0.68. Afumaţi: half-time lead 32%, second-half goals 0.79.
Goals by minute
Tunari: 76-90+ (12 goals). Afumaţi: 76-90+ (11 goals). This is historical distribution, not a predicted goal minute.
League context
Liga II: 2.71 goals per match, BTTS 49%, Over 2.5 49%.
Head-to-head
1 H2H matches: 0-0-1. Average goals 2.00, BTTS 0%.
Match description
The favorites are the visitors Afumaţi, who have scored 30 goals this season compared to Tunari’s 19 and hold a +6 away goal difference while the hosts have -9 at home. Afumaţi average 1.7 goals on the road, whereas Tunari manage only 0.91 goals per home match; the visitors’ defense concedes 1.1 goals per game versus Tunari’s 1.73 at home. Chance quality favors the visitors — Afumaţi average 5 shots on target and 11.9 shots overall per match with a 14% conversion, versus the hosts’ 3.64 on target, 10.09 overall and 9% conversion. Afumaţi also show greater defensive stability: 40% clean sheets away and only 10% of matches without scoring, while Tunari have 9% clean sheets and 27% of matches without a goal. Although Tunari average 1.6 points per game in their last 5 matches compared to Afumaţi’s 1.2, the xG advantage (1.64 xG for the visitors vs 1.34 for the hosts and xG against 1.62 vs 2.11) and superior efficiency lead me to back an away win.
Half-by-half
Match statistics
Pre-match profile— what do the season numbers say?
This is a team profile based on season data and form. Match-flow statistics are shown only after the fixture is played.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Attack and defence comparison for both teams in the current season.
Shooting quality
| Tunari | Afumaţi | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 34% | 41% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.13 | 0.14 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five matches and season record, overall and split by home and away matches.
Tunari is 175% better for: last-5 form.
2.2 pts / match - Tunari · 0.8 pts / match - Afumaţi
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Afumaţi is 36% better for: goals scored per match.
1 goals / match - Tunari · 1.36 goals / match - Afumaţi
Afumaţi is 31% better for: goals conceded per match.
1.64 goals / match - Tunari · 1.25 goals / match - Afumaţi
Tunari scores in 68% of matches (19 of 28 matches), while Afumaţi keeps a clean sheet in 29% (8 of 28 matches).
Afumaţi scores in 75% of matches (21 of 28 matches), while Tunari keeps a clean sheet in 7% (2 of 28 matches).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away matches in the current season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often both teams' matches have goals on both sides, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these matches cross the goal lines?
How often matches involving these teams clear goal thresholds, in the full match and in each half.
Full match - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under — Tunari
Over / Under — Afumaţi
1st half
2nd half
Match halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Afumaţi is 53% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
0.86 pts / match - Tunari · 1.32 pts / match - Afumaţi
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Tunari - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 14% of matches and wins 21%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.2 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
Afumaţi - second-half results
Leads at half-time in 32% of matches and wins 39%. Also wins matches without a half-time lead.
Concedes 0.1 more goals per match after half-time - defensive level drops in the second half.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.60 | 1.80 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.6 | 1.2 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Average goals in match | 1.0 | 1.8 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 100% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 40% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 40% | 40% |
| Goal difference | +1 | +3 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per match | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / match | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| Average goals in match | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 60% |
| 2 goals | 40% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 20% |
| Clean sheet | 40% | 60% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | -2 | -2 |
* Colours in tables show event frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate, red is rare. It is frequency, not a team rating.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
Match phases in which both teams most often score and concede.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (12 goli). Concedes most in 76-90 (14). Late-goal balance (76-90): -2 - late phases are a weakness.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (11 goli). Concedes most in 0-15 (8). Late-goal balance (76-90): +6 - wins late phases.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends based on completed matches from the current season.
Match profile
Tunari
Afumaţi
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range are calculated from public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical match profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed matches from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (Liga II).
Teams vs league
| Tunari | Liga | Afumaţi | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals in match | • 2.64 | 2.71 | ▼ 2.61 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 64% | 49% | • 50% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | • 50% | 49% | • 50% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 7% | 29% | • 29% |
| Goal before half-time | ▼ 68% | 72% | ▲ 79% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 96% | 82% | ▼ 75% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Head-to-head
Previous meeting: Tunari 0 - 0 - 1 Afumaţi. Average goals 2.00, both teams scored in 0% matches.
FAQ
What was the result of Tunari vs Afumaţi?
The Liga II match finished Tunari 0:4 Afumaţi. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What do the goal statistics show before Tunari vs Afumaţi?
Tunari score 1.00 goals per game on average and Afumaţi 1.36. The Liga II average is 2.71 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 49% of games. Both teams score in 64% of Tunari's matches and 50% of Afumaţi's.
What form are Tunari and Afumaţi in?
Over the last 5 games Tunari have a 3-2-0 record (2.20 points per game) and Afumaţi 1-1-3 (0.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Tunari vs Afumaţi?
Here you can check the pre-match numbers for Tunari vs Afumaţi: form, H2H, goals and Over/Under. The pick itself, value and reasoning are published in the NoFluffPicks app.