Ulsan vs Jeju United: match statistics
Ulsan vs Jeju United: form, goals and key statistics
Game details
Ulsan played against Jeju United in K League 1 (South Korea). The game was played on May 13, 2026. Final score: 2:1.
Recent form
Ulsan has 2 wins, 1 draw and 2 losses over its last five games, averaging 1.40 points per game. Jeju United has 3 wins, 0 draws and 2 losses, with 1.80 points per game.
Scoring records
Ulsan scores 1.54 goals per game and allows 1.31. Jeju United scores 0.85 and allows 0.92. Games in this league average 2.25 goals.
BTTS and goal totals
Both teams score in 62% of Ulsan's games and 38% of Jeju United's. The Over 2.5 rates are 54% and 23%, compared with league averages of 47% for BTTS and 36% for Over 2.5.
xG and shots
Ulsan has the higher season xG average, 1.86 to 1.31 per game. Ulsan takes 16.2 shots per game, while Jeju United takes 10.6.
First-half and second-half trends
Ulsan leads at halftime in 38% of its games and scores 0.92 goals per game after halftime. Jeju United leads at halftime in 38% and scores 0.38 after halftime.
When the teams score
Ulsan's most productive scoring window is minutes 76-90+ (6 goals). For Jeju United, it is minutes 16-30 (4 goals). These are past scoring patterns, not predicted goal times.
League scoring profile
K League 1 games average 2.25 goals. Both teams score in 47% of games, and 36% finish with at least three goals.
Head-to-head record
Before this game, 5 previous meetings were available. The record was 4 home wins, 0 draws and 1 away win. Those games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
Archived pre-match analysis
This analysis was prepared before kick-off. The conclusions use only information available before the match and do not include the final result or post-match statistics.
General match analysis
I back the home win (1): Ulsan sit 2nd in the table while Jeju are 7th, with Ulsan scoring 20 goals this season versus 11 for the visitors. Looking at home/away splits, Ulsan average 1.57 goals and 2.00 xG per home match, whereas Jeju average 1.00 goal and 1.13 xG on the road, indicating a clear home advantage in the quality of created chances. Ulsan register 17.86 shots per match (5.43 on target) with a conversion rate around 9%, while Jeju manage only 8.83 shots (3.33 on target) with conversion near 11% — the visitors are efficient but generate far fewer opportunities. Defensively Jeju have the edge — they concede just 0.67 goals away on average and keep clean sheets in 50% of away matches, whereas Ulsan concede 1.57 at home with a 29% clean sheet rate; additionally Jeju average 1.8 points over the last 5 matches with 3 wins, compared to Ulsan’s 1.4 points and 2 wins. Considering Ulsan’s advantage in xG and shot volume versus Jeju’s defensive solidity, I assign 55% to a home win, 25% to a draw and 20% to an away win.
View the statistical overviewBTTS - will both teams score?
I forecast No BTTS with a 62% probability versus 38% for BTTS. The strongest argument is Jeju — seasonal clean sheet rate 50% and only 0.67 goals conceded per match on average with a seasonal BTTS of 33%, indicating a high chance of a clean sheet. Ulsan averages 0.71 goals this season, has a low shot conversion rate of 6% and only 29% clean sheets, and in the last 5 matches scored an average of 1.0 goal with 60% BTTS, providing a mixed offensive signal. Although recent 5-match xG is balanced (Ulsan 1.66 vs Jeju 1.74) and Ulsan registers more shots on target (4.86 vs 3.33), Jeju’s defensive stability (50% CS seasonally, 0.8 goals conceded in L5) outweighs that, hence the pick: No (No BTTS).
View BTTS statisticsOver/Under - goals analysis
I forecast Under 2.5 as the best pick; expected goals are Ulsan 0.71, Jeju 1.00, total 1.71. Although xG indicates higher potential (Ulsan xG_for 1.46, Jeju xG_for 1.13), actual outcomes reflect low finishing: Ulsan has a conversion rate of 6% on 12.14 shots (yielding ~0.73 goals), Jeju 11% on 8.83 shots (~0.97 goals). Seasonally only 29% of Ulsan’s matches and 17% of Jeju’s matches finish over 2.5 goals (respectively 71% and 83% under 2.5), and over 3.5 occurs in 0% of matches for both teams, making Over 3.5 extremely unlikely. In the last 5 games both teams combined have averaged 1.8 goals (Ulsan 1.0, Jeju 0.8), and BTTS appears in only 43% and 33% of fixtures, so I expect a low tempo and defense deciding the outcome. Based on these numbers I assign 65% to Over 1.5 (35% Under), 22% to Over 2.5 (78% Under) and 1% to Over 3.5 (99% Under), therefore the strongest and best tip is Under on the 2.5 line.
View Over/Under statisticsHT/FT - half-time and full-time scenario
Jeju appears the favorite: they have a 50% win rate versus Ulsan’s 29% and a 60% win rate in the last five matches compared to the home side’s 40%. At Half-Time Jeju led in 50% of games, averaging 0.67 goals by the break, while Ulsan led in only 29% and averages 0.29 goals at Half-Time; additionally Jeju concedes 0.0 goals on average before the break. Ulsan produces higher xG (1.46 vs 1.13) and more shots (12.14 vs 8.83) and shots on target (4.86 vs 3.33), but has lower finishing efficiency (6% vs 11%), so the creative edge does not convert into first-half goals. The Second Half is often decisive: over 0.5 second-half goals occur for the home team in 71% and for the visitors in 67% of matches, which increases the likelihood that a draw at the break will be resolved in favor of the more efficient team. Consequently the most likely scenario is a draw at Half-Time and a Jeju win at Full-Time (X/2).
View first-half and second-half statisticsStats by half
Game stats
Pre-game profile— what do the season numbers say?
This team profile combines season stats and recent form. In-game statistics appear after the final whistle.
Team stats— who is more efficient?
Compare both teams' attacking and defensive records this season.
Shooting quality
| Ulsan | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|
| Accuracy (shots on target) | 32% | 39% |
| Chance quality (xG per shot) | 0.11 | 0.12 |
| Finishing (goals per shot on target) | 0.30 | 0.20 |
xG per shot around 0.08 usually means long-range attempts; 0.15+ usually means box chances. The style label comes from possession, shot volume and conversion.
* xG (expected goals) says how many goals a team should score from its chances. If actual goals are above xG, finishing is above average; if below xG, chances are being missed.
Team form— who is in better shape?
Last five games and season record, overall, at home and away.
Jeju United is 29% better for: last-5 form.
1.4 pts / game - Ulsan · 1.8 pts / game - Jeju United
Goals— how do both teams score and concede?
How many goals both teams score and concede, plus how often they keep a clean sheet or fail to score.
Ulsan is 81% better for: goals scored per game.
1.54 goals / game - Ulsan · 0.85 goals / game - Jeju United
Jeju United is 42% better for: goals allowed per game.
1.31 goals / game - Ulsan · 0.92 goals / game - Jeju United
Ulsan scores in 77% of games (10 of 13 meczów), while Jeju United keeps a clean sheet in 38% (5 of 13 meczów).
Jeju United scores in 69% of games (9 of 13 meczów), while Ulsan keeps a clean sheet in 23% (3 of 13 meczów).
How often they score at least...
How often they concede at least...
* Statistics include both teams' home and away games this season.
Both teams scored (BTTS)— how often do both teams score?
How often games involving these teams produce goals at both ends, compared with the league average.
Goal patterns
BTTS and goal count
Goal count (Over/Under)— how often do these games cross the goal lines?
See how often games involving these teams clear each goal line, for the full game and each half.
Full game - team comparison (Over)
Over / Under - Ulsan
Over / Under - Jeju United
1st half
2nd half
Game halves— when do the teams score more often?
How teams split performance between first and second half: goals, points, clean sheets and half-time state.
Jeju United is 11% better for: first-half form (half-time points).
1.46 pts / game - Ulsan · 1.62 pts / game - Jeju United
Before half-time (1st half)
After half-time (2nd half)
Ulsan - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 54%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Defense stays consistent across the full game.
Jeju United - second-half results
Leads at halftime in 38% of games and wins 38%. Also wins some games without leading at halftime.
Allows 0.6 more goals per game after halftime, a sign that the defense becomes less effective later in games.
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.6 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.8 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| 1 goal | 80% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 20% | 40% |
| 3 goals | 20% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 60% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 40% |
| Goal difference | -2 | 0 |
| 1st half | 2nd half | |
|---|---|---|
| Points per game | 1.60 | 1.00 |
| Goals scored / game | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| Goals allowed / game | 0.2 | 0.6 |
| Average goals per game | 0.6 | 1.0 |
| 1 goal | 60% | 80% |
| 2 goals | 0% | 20% |
| 3 goals | 0% | 0% |
| Clean sheet | 80% | 40% |
| No goal | 60% | 60% |
| Goal difference | +1 | -1 |
* Table colors show frequency: green is common, yellow is moderate and red is rare. They are not team ratings.
Goals by minute— when do goals arrive?
The parts of a game in which both teams score and allow the most goals.
Most dangerous in minutes 76-90 (6 goals). Concedes most in 0-15 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): +3 - wins late phases.
Most dangerous in minutes 16-30 (4 goals). Concedes most in 76-90 (5). Late-goal balance (76-90): -3 - late phases are a weakness.
* Buckets 31-45 and 76-90 include added-time goals.
Additional team indicators— what do xG, efficiency and form show?
A comparison of chance quality, results and trends from completed games this season.
Game profile
Ulsan
Jeju United
* The estimated goal total and split, BTTS estimate, 0:0 risk and goal range use public season averages and frequencies for both teams. This is a statistical game profile, not a private model prediction or betting pick. The remaining indicators describe completed games from the season.
League context— is this a high-scoring league?
How both teams compare with league-wide averages (K League 1).
Teams vs league
| Ulsan | Liga | Jeju United | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Average goals per game | ▲ 2.85 | 2.25 | ▼ 1.77 |
| Both teams scored | ▲ 62% | 47% | ▼ 38% |
| Min. 3 goals (Over 2.5) | ▲ 54% | 36% | ▼ 23% |
| Clean sheets | ▼ 23% | 31% | ▲ 38% |
| Goal before half-time | ▲ 77% | 62% | ▼ 54% |
| Goal after half-time | ▲ 85% | 75% | ▼ 69% |
^ green = above league average, ˇ red = below league average. This shows direction of the gap, not a team rating.
Lineups and player events
Verified starters, substitutes and recorded player events for this match.
Home team
Starting lineup
Substitutes
Away team
Starting lineup
Match timeline
Goals, cards and substitutions arranged in chronological order.
Referee and managers
Open their season profiles to compare match records, goals and disciplinary trends.
Head-to-head
Record from Ulsan's perspective: 4 wins, 0 draws and 1 loss against Jeju United. Games average 1.80 goals, and both teams scored in 20% of them.
FAQ
What was the result of Ulsan vs Jeju United?
The K League 1 match finished Ulsan 2:1 Jeju United. Full match statistics, the half-by-half breakdown and head-to-head are on this page.
What is the head-to-head record between Ulsan and Jeju United?
In the last 5 head-to-head matches Ulsan won 4, Jeju United won 1 and 0 ended level. These games averaged 1.80 goals, with both teams scoring in 20% of them.
What do the goal statistics show before Ulsan vs Jeju United?
Ulsan score 1.54 goals per game on average and Jeju United 0.85. The K League 1 average is 2.25 goals, with Over 2.5 landing in 36% of games. Both teams score in 62% of Ulsan's matches and 38% of Jeju United's.
What form are Ulsan and Jeju United in?
Over the last 5 games Ulsan have a 2-1-2 record (1.40 points per game) and Jeju United 3-0-2 (1.80 points per game).
Where can I find a betting tip and analysis for Ulsan vs Jeju United?
This page shows the full statistical context — form, head-to-head, goals, BTTS and Over/Under. The tip, value assessment and full reasoning are in the NoFluffPicks app.


